Reviewed: ‘Pierre Jacques Volaire (1729-1799)’
Recently added to The Art Tribune:
Emilie Beck Saiello, Pierre Jacques Volaire (1729-1799), dit le Chevalier Volaire (Paris: Arthena, 2010), 486 pages, ISBN: 9782903239435, 119€ / $175.
Reviewed by Bénédicte Bonnet Saint-Georges; posted 31 October 2011.
He does not lie in the pantheon of great artists and his work does not fall under the genre of grand painting; some would even say that his art is repetitive, a succession of views of Mount Vesuvius meant to sell briskly as souvenirs of the Grand Tour. Emilie Beck Saiello has nevertheless set out to reinstate the artistic legacy of Pierre Jacques Volaire, known as the Chevalier Volaire, by publishing the catalogue raisonné of his works at Arthena Ed. She explains that ‘art history is not made up of only great masters just as history is not made up only of great men and the study of a successful or “commercial” artist might lead us to discover how his work reflected the taste, culture and aesthetics of a certain period and was able to express a moment, a place and a society.’ . . .
The full review is available here»
Seminar Series: Tableaux Vivants
Le tableau vivant ou l’image performée: sources, méthodes, enjeux
Institut national d’histoire de l’art, Paris, 2011-2012
For the 2011-2012 academic year, INHA in Paris is addressing tableaux vivants with six sessions on the topic. The second in the series takes place on Tuesday, 29 November, from 5-7pm. More information on the series as a whole is available here»
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
From Le Blog de l’ApAhAu
Aux frontières du tableau vivant : la pantomime ou l’éloquence du corps, XVIIIe-XIXe siècles
Institut national d’histoire de l’art, Paris, 29 November 2011
Organized by Julie Ramos and Léonard Pouy
Communément définie comme un arrangement de personnes vivantes reproduisant une composition artistique, que ce soit une peinture, une sculpture, une estampe ou une scène littéraire, la pratique du « tableau vivant » aurait, selon les récits admis, connu son apogée dans les salons privés du début du XIXesiècle avant de déchoir en simple divertissement populaire. Cette vision du tableau vivant a contribué à concentrer son étude autour de 1800, à occulter ses origines plus anciennes, ainsi qu’à négliger ses évolutions ultérieures et son apport à l’histoire de l’art. Partant de ce constat, ce séminaire vise à examiner le tableau vivant et ses genres connexes dans la durée, ainsi qu’à saisir la manière dont ils franchissent les frontières esthétiques et sociales et questionnent les définitions traditionnelles de l’art.
Pratique variée et sans cesse réactivée, des anciennes entrées royales au cinéma et à l’art contemporain, elle interroge la relation entre mimesis et représentation, la capacité de l’art à véhiculer des affects et des idéaux, ainsi que les statuts d’auteur et de spectateur. L’étude des tableaux vivants permet de réfléchir sur le caractère reproductible et la diffusion des œuvres d’art, sur l’apparition du terme dans la critique, sur les effets de réel et de présence, ou encore sur les relations entre image et performativité.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Chiara Savettieri Wurmser (Université de Pise)
L’art du geste comme modèle de la peinture ? le cas de Jacques Nicolas Paillot de Montabert
Enseignant-chercheur en Histoire de l’Art à l’Université de Pise, Chiara Savettieri travaille sur les interactions entre peinture et littérature de même qu’entre arts visuels et musique. Parmi ses travaux les plus significatifs: Ingannare la morte. Anne-Louis Girodet Trioson e l’illusione dell’arte (Palermo 2005), tiré d’une partie de sa thèse de doctorat consacrée à la pensée esthétique de Anne-Louis Girodet ; Dal Neoclassicismo al Romanticismo. Fonti per la Storia dell’arte (Carocci, 2006, Rome, 766 p.) ; “Il faut que le peintre adopte, comme le musicien, un mode: peinture et musique dans la pensée esthétique de Paillot de Montabert”, Jacques-Nicolas Paillot de Montabert, 1771 – 1849: idées, pratiques, contextes, dir. par F.Desbuissons, Langres, Guéniot, 2009, p. 171-187 ; “L’essence du cinéma consiste dans le rythme : peinture, cinéma et musique dans l’Univers de Luigi Veronesi”, dans Ligeia, 97/100.2010, p. 83-95 . Avec Marie-Pauline Martin elle a organisé le colloque «La musique face aux Beaux-arts ou les vicissitudes de l’imitation» (Centre Allemand d’Histoire de l’art, INHA, février 2010) dont la publication des actes est en préparation.
Arnaud Rykner (Université Paris 3-Sorbonne Nouvelle)
Le paradigme pantomimique
Romancier, essayiste et dramaturge, Arnaud Rykner est également Professeur à l’Institut d’Etudes Théâtrales de l’Université Paris 3-Sorbonne Nouvelle et membre associé du Laboratoire « Lettres, Langages et Arts » de l’Université Toulouse II – Le Mirail. Il a notamment dirigé l’ouvrage Pantomime et théâtre du corps. Le jeu du hors-texte (Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2009, 245 p.) ; « Tableau vivant, scène érotique. L’entrelacs des images et des corps », Journée d’études Théâtralité de la scène érotique aux XIXe et XXe siècles, 21 mai 2010, Maison de la Recherche de l’Université Toulouse II – Le Mirail. Les actes du colloque Entre code et corps. Tableau vivant et photographie mise en scène, organisé en collaboration avec Christine Buignet à Toulouse du 18 au 20 mars 2010, paraîtront en mars 2012 dans le 22e numéro de la revue Figures de l’art.
Bernard Vouilloux (Université de Paris-Sorbonne)
Gestes, attitudes, mouvements : le tableau vivant des arts de la scène à la photographie
Professeur de littérature française du XXe siècle (littérature et arts visuels) à l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne, Bernard Vouilloux a centré ses recherches sur les rapports entre le verbal et le visuel, littérature et peinture, poétique et esthétique. Outre de très nombreux articles (notamment dans les revues Poétique, Littérature et Critique), il a publié dix-sept ouvrages, parmi lesquels La Peinture dans le texte. XVIIIe-XXe siècles (CNRS Éditions, 1994), Langages de l’art et relations transesthétiques (Éd. de l’Éclat, 1997), Le Geste, suivi de Le geste ressassant (La Lettre volée, 2001), Le Tableau vivant. Phryné, l’orateur et le peintre (Flammarion, 2002), L’œuvre en souffrance. Entre poétique et esthétique (Belin, 2004), Tableaux d’auteurs. Après l’Ut pictura poesis (Presses universitaires de Vincennes, 2004), Écriture de fantaisie. Grotesques, arabesques, zigzags et serpentins (Hermann, 2008), Un art sans art. Champfleury et les arts mineurs (Fage Éditions, 2009), Le Silence et la nuit des images. Penser l’image avec Pascal Quignard (Hermann, 2010), Le Tournant « artiste » de la littérature française. Écrire avec la peinture au XIXe siècle (Hermann, 2011).
Pauline Beaucé (Université de Nantes, Centre Marc Bloch, Berlin)
Répondante
Auteur d’une thèse de doctorat consacrée à la Poétique de la parodie dramatique d’opéra au XVIIIe siècle en France (dir. F. Rubellin), Pauline Beaucé est membre du Centre d’études des théâtres de la Foire et de la Comédie-Italienne (Univ. de Nantes). Rattachée au Centre Marc Bloch, elle a édité plusieurs parodies d’opéra (et notamment une parodie pantomime) aux Editions Espaces 34 et a publié différents articles sur le théâtre au XVIIIe siècle tels « La parodie-pantomime d’opéra au XVIIIe siècle ou l’adaptation sous contraintes », actes du colloque L’Adaptation comique, de la référence à l’irrévérence, 2009 ; « Musique et théâtre : pour de nouvelles perspectives théoriques et méthodologiques à partir de l’exemple de la parodie dramatique d’opéra en France au XVIIIe siècle », colloque junior franco-allemand Musique-Contexte, CIERA, Berlin, 4-6 février 2010, actes à paraître, chez Lang ; « L’envers parodique du magicien d’opéra au XVIIIe siècle », Les Scènes de l’enchantement, Desjonquères, 2011.
Exhibition: French Drawings from the Mariette Collection
From the Louvre, as noted by Hélène Bremer:
French Drawings from the Mariette Collection
Musée du Louvre, Paris, 10 November 2011 — 6 February 2012
Curated by Pierre Rosenberg, Laure Barthélemy-Labeeuw, and Bénédicte Gady
Jean-Baptiste Oudry, Egret (Paris: Louvre)
Pierre Jean Mariette (1694–1774) brought together one of the most fascinating collections in the whole of the eighteenth century, with drawings taking pride of place (around ten thousand sheets). Masterpieces by great artists stood alongside pieces of bravura by minor masters, in line with the encyclopedic commitment of this “genius jack-of-all-trades.” A collection of this caliber seemed destined to join those of king and nation. This was the wish of both Mariette and the administration—but, as sometimes happens, the heirs decided otherwise. The auctioning-off lasted for no less than two and a half months, during which time nearly one thousand drawings were nonetheless purchased for the king’s cabinet.
Pierre Rosenberg, of the French Academy, President emeritus of the Musée du Louvre, assisted by Laure Barthélemy-Labeeuw, rose to the dizzying challenge of reconstructing this legendary collection by scouring public and private collections the world over to track down drawings that had once belonged to Mariette. On the occasion of the publication of two initial volumes listing nearly four thousand French drawings, the Musée du Louvre is presenting the survey’s methodological basis and its main findings. On display are around one hundred works, some famous and some recently identified, which went from the collector’s to the museum’s portfolios.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
From Artbooks.com:
Pierre Rosenberg and Laure Barthélemy-Labeeuw, Les Dessins de la Collection de Pierre-Jean Mariette, volumes 1-2 (Milan: Electa, 2011), 704 pages, ISBN: 9788837064273, €600 / $900.
After the reproduction of the complete auction catalogue illustrated by Saint-Aubin and kept in Boston, a necessary tool through which to track down many of the items, the entire drawing collection which belonged to Pierre-Jean Mariette (1694-1774) is now being reproposed. Without any doubt, to use the words of Frederik Johannes “Frits” Lugt, the 20th-century collector, Mariette was the greatest, if not the ‘prince’ in the field of drawing collections. He began his collection during brief sojourns in Italy and, from 1750 onwards, devoted himself exclusively to this pursuit. During his lifetime he put together almost 9,000 items, carefully cataloguing them according to school and type. When he died, they were scattered as a result of 42 auctions (between November 1775 and January 1776).
The incredible task of putting the collection back together was made possible because of the trade-mark (a capital M) which Mariette stamped on every drawing he owned and by the unusual mounting of each drawing on a blue background (‘Mariette blue’) which brought out the best qualities of the drawings. The whole collection will be published in six volumes: the first two are devoted to the French School, three to the Italian school and one to the Dutch, Flemish and German schools. A monumental work of inestimable historical and artistic value. This ambitious publishing project reconstructed the world’s largest-ever collection of drawings. The first volumes focus on the French school: thousands of drawings that were scattered worldwide can now finally be seen at a single glance.
Additional information (in Italian) comes from the Italian bookseller, LibroCo.Italia»
Humphrey Wine provides a review in the April 2012 issue of Apollo Magazine (note added April 2012).
Fellowship: New York Public Library
From the NYPL:
New York Public Library Short-term Fellowships, 2012-13
Applications due 1 March 2012
NYPL Reading Room, January 2006
(Photo by David Iliff, Wikimedia Commons)
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
The New York Public Library is delighted to announce the availability of short-term fellowships to support visiting scholars conducting research in the Library’s unique research and special collections. Fellowships stipends up to $4,000 are available to scholars from outside the New York metropolitan area engaged in graduate-level, post-doctoral, or independent research. Scholars researching in the humanities including but not limited to art history, cultural studies, history, literature, performing arts and photography are welcome to apply. Applicants must be United States citizens or permanent residents with the legal right to work in the U.S. . . .
More information is available at the Library’s website.
Exhibition: Contested Visions in the Spanish Colonial World
From LACMA:
Contested Visions in the Spanish Colonial World
Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 6 November 2011 — 29 January 2012
Museo Nacional de Historia, Mexico City, 6 July — 7 October 2012
"The Apparition of San Miguel del Milagro to Diego Lázaro," first half of the 18th century (Museo Universitario Casa de los Muñecos, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico)
Contested Visions in the Spanish Colonial World examines the significance of indigenous peoples within the artistic landscape of colonial Latin America. The exhibition offers a comparative view of the two principal viceroyalties of Spanish America—Mexico and Peru—from the fifteenth to the nineteenth centuries. Under colonial rule, Amerindians were not a passive or homogenous group but instead commissioned art for their communities and promoted specific images of themselves as a polity. By taking into consideration the pre-Columbian (Inca and Aztec) origins of these two vast geopolitical regions and their continuities and ruptures over time, Contested Visions offers an arresting perspective on how art and power intersected in the Spanish colonial world. The exhibition is divided into themes:
Contested Visions
Tenochtitlan and Cuzco Pre-Columbian Antecedents
Ancient Styles in the New Era
Conquest and New World Orders
The Devotional Landscape and the Indian as Good Christian
Indian Festivals and Sacred Rituals
Memory, Genealogy, and Land
A checklist of the exhibition is available here»
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Exhibition catalogue: Ilona Katzew, ed., Contested Visions in the Spanish Colonial World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011), 320 pages, ISBN: 9780300176643, $70.
Contested Visions offers a comparative view of the two principal viceroyalties of Spanish America: Mexico and Peru. Spanning developments from the 15th to the 19th century, this ambitious book looks at the many ways and contexts in which indigenous peoples were represented in art of the early modern period—by colonial artists, European artists, and themselves. More than two hundred works of art, including paintings, sculptures, illustrated books, maps, codices, manuscripts, and other materials such as textiles, keros, and feather works, are reproduced in full-color illustrations, demonstrating the rich variety of these artistic approaches.
A collection of essays by an international team of distinguished scholars in the field uncovers the different meanings and purposes behind these depictions of native populations of the Americas. These experts explore
the role of the visual arts in negotiating a sense of place in late pre-Columbian and colonial Latin America. They address a range of important topics, such as the construct of the Indian as a good Christian; how Amerindians drew on their pre-Columbian past to stake out a place within the Spanish body politic; their participation in festive rites; and their role as artists. Lavishly illustrated, this ambitious book provides a compelling and original framework by which to understand the intersection of vision and power in the Spanish colonial world.
Ilona Katzew is curator and co-department head of Latin American art at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Symposium: Contested Visions in the Spanish Colonial World
Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 2-4 December 2011
LACMA and UCLA are co-sponsoring a major international three-day symposium in conjunction with the special exhibition Contested Visions in the Spanish Colonial World, which brings together thirty of the most distinguished scholars in the field from Mexico, South America, Europe, and the United States.
Free, no reservations | Printable Schedule | View Abstracts
Exhibition: Collective Creativity in 18th-Century Japanese Painting
From The Princeton University Art Museum:
Multiple Hands: Collective Creativity in Eighteenth-Century Japanese Painting
Princeton University Art Museum, 8 October 2011 — 22 January 2012
Curated by Xiaojin Wu
The study of individual artists has dominated modern art history, to the neglect of the collective creativity that contributed to countless important works of art. In Japan, as in many other cultures, collective creativity played—and still plays—a significant role in art-making. The exhibition Multiple Hands: Collective Creativity in Eighteenth-Century Japanese Painting, through a selection of paintings from the Princeton University Art Museum, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Philadelphia Museum of Art, and a private collection, provides a thoughtful consideration of the collective art-making process by focusing on two kinds of collective painting practices—workshop and collaborative— in eighteenth-century Japan.
Kano Tsunenobu, "Four Accomplishments," ca. 1700. Hanging silk scroll, 224.8 x 190.5 cm.
Interrelated but not identical, both practices involved multiple artists in the production of single works. In a workshop system, the head of the studio designed the composition of a painting, often a large-format work, and his assistants executed the details and applied colors. Only the master’s name was signed, however, making the presence of multiple hands in the paintings’ creation sometimes difficult to discern. Representative of the Kano school workshop—a prodigious hereditary apprentice system organized by generations of the Kano family from the sixteenth to the nineteenth century—is a pair
of large hanging scrolls, Four Accomplishments.
Kano Tsunenobu, "Four Accomplishments," ca. 1700. Hanging silk scroll, 224.8 x 190.5 cm.
Signed by the head of the workshop, Kano Tsunenobu (1636–1713), the two paintings exhibit the brushwork styles of more than one artist, particularly evident in the background. This signals the involvement of multiple workshop members in producing Four Accomplishments. Another important feature of the Kano workshop operation is the use of style manuals: workshop assistants had limited access to original paintings, so copies made by the head of the workshop served as style manuals that the assistants studied and relied on in collectively producing one work. Consequently, certain
motifs in a similar style are used repeatedly in different works, as
demonstrated by a painting of a long-tailed bird by Kano Tsunenobu
and a similar passage in his Four Accomplishments. (more…)
Call for Papers: Histories of British Art
Histories of British Art, 1660-1735: Reconstruction and Transformation
King’s Manor, University of York, 20-22 September 2012
Proposals due 2 March 2012
We welcome proposals from graduate students, academics working in History of Art and other Humanities disciplines, curators and all others engaged in research on the field. The conference is a key output of a major AHRC-funded project on art of the period, Court, Country, City: British Art, 1660-1735. This project is ran in collaboration between Tate Britain and the University of York, and led by Professor Mark Hallett (York), Professor Nigel Llewellyn (Tate), and Dr. Martin Myrone (Tate).
Conference costs will be heavily subsidized thanks to AHRC funding, however spaces for the conference are limited and priority will be given to speakers. A number of graduate student bursaries will be available. Please send abstracts of no more than 300 words to claudine.vanhensbergen@tate.org.uk
A PDF of the poster is available here»
Call for Papers: Knowledge in a Box
Knowledge in a Box: How Mundane Things Shape Knowledge Production
Kavala, Greece, 26-29 July 2012
Proposals due by 15 January 2012
Organizers: Susanne Bauer (Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany), Maria Rentetzi (National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece), and Martina Schlünder (Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany)
We invite proposals from scholars in the history of science, technology, and medicine, science and technology studies, the humanities, visual and performing arts, museum and cultural studies and other related disciplines for a workshop on the uses and meanings of mundane things such as boxes, packages, bottles, and vials in shaping knowledge production. In keeping with the conference theme, we are asking contributors to include specific references to the ways in which boxes have played a role—commercial, epistemic or otherwise—in their own particular disciplinary frameworks.
Boxes have always supported the significance of the objects they contained, allowing specific activities to arise. In the hands of natural historians and collectors, boxes functioned as a means of organizing their knowledge throughout the eighteenth century. They formed the material bases of the cabinet or established collection and accompanied the collector from the initial gathering of natural specimens to their final display. As “knowledge chests” or “magazining tools” the history of box-like containers also go back to book printing and the typographical culture. The artists’ boxes of the early nineteenth century were used to store the paraphernalia of a new fashionable trend. In the late nineteenth century the box became the pharmacist’s laboratory and a device for standardizing and controlling dosage of oral remedies. In the twentieth century radiotherapy the box was elevated to a multifunctional tool working as a memory aid to forgetful patients or as “knowledge package” that predetermined dosages, included equipment, and ready-made radium applicators.
Focusing on medicine, boxes have played a crucial role since the eighteenth century when doctors ought to bring instruments to their patient’s house for surgical or obstetrical interventions. In modern operating rooms boxes organize the workflow and build an essential part of the aseptical regime. Late twentieth century biomedical scientists store tissue samples in large-scale biobanks, where samples contained in straws are placed in vials, then the vials in boxes which in turn are stacked up in “elevators.” This storage system facilitates retrieval with barcodes, indexing each individual sample so that additional variables can be retrieved from a database. Thus the container and its content are tied up in a close epistemic and material relationship. (more…)
Exhibition: Daniel Sarrabat
From the Centre des monuments nationaux website:
Daniel Sarrabat (1666-1743) l’éclat retrouvé
Monastère royal de Brou, Bourg-en-Bresse (near Lyon), 15 October 2011 — 29 January 2012
Curated by François Marandet
Cette exposition révèle l’art d’un des plus grands peintre d’histoire à Lyon et dans sa région, pendant la première moitié du XVIIIe siècle : Daniel Sarrabat (1666-1743). Alors que le style rocaille triomphe en France, il poursuit l’idéal artistique de Nicolas Poussin, et montre combien la peinture d’histoire s’est maintenue à Lyon et dans sa région depuis la disparition de Jacques Stella (1596-1657) et Thomas Blanchet (1614-1689).
Cette toute première rétrospective rassemble près de 50 œuvres de l’artiste, dont 36 tableaux. Sont présentées des réalisations inédites aux cotés d’œuvres de collections privées, notamment le décor mythique de l’Hôtel de Sénozan, à Lyon, complété par un groupe de tableaux provenant du patrimoine religieux de la région, avec le cycle illustrant l’histoire de Marie-Madeleine de l’église de Thoissey. Le parcours de l’exposition restitue les étapes successives de la carrière de Daniel Sarrabat : l’époque de son apprentissage à Paris, le séjour à
Rome (1685-1694), son implantation à Lyon en 1695, jusqu’à sa consécration
(1716-1732).
Additional information is available from the exhibition brochure (PDF).
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Catalogue: François Marandet, Daniel Sarrabat, 1666-1748 (Saint-Étienne: I.A.C. Éditions d’Art, 2011), 128 pages, ISBN: 9782916373478, $42.50. [Available from Artbooks.com]
Call for Papers: Design History
Design/History/Revolution
The New School, New York, 27-28 April 2012
Proposals due by 7 December 2011
Keynote speaker: Barry Bergdoll, The Philip Johnson Chief Curator of Architecture & Design, MoMA
Whether by providing agitprop for revolutionary movements, an aesthetics of empire, or a language for numerous avant-gardes, design has changed the world. But how? Why? And under what conditions? We propose a consideration of design as an historical agent, a contested category, and a mode of historical analysis. This interdisciplinary conference aims to explore these questions and to open up new possibilities for understanding the relationships among design, history and revolution. Casting a wide net, we define our terms broadly. We seek 20-minute papers that examine the roles of design in generating, shaping, remembering or challenging moments of social, political, economic, aesthetic, intellectual, technological, religious, and other upheaval. We consider a range of historical periods (ancient, pre-modern, early modern, modern, post- and post-post-modern) and geographical locations (“West,” “East,” “North,” South,” and contact zones between these constructed categories). We examine not only designed objects (e.g., industrial design, decorative arts, graphic design, fashion) but also spaces (e.g., architecture, interiors, landscapes, urban settings) and systems (e.g., communications, services, governments). And we welcome a diversity of disciplinary and inter-disciplinary approaches.
This conference brings together scholars from the humanities, sciences, and social sciences with designers, artists, and other creators. We hope not only to present multiple methodological approaches but also to foster conversations across traditional spatial, cultural, and disciplinary boundaries.
We list some possible subject areas, and encourage you to propose others:
- Design and political / cultural / economic revolution….. Design and technological revolution…. Design and the print revolution
- Design and government…. Design and social movements…. Design and surveillance…. Design and empire….
- Design and historicity…. Design and the sacred……Design and the avant-garde…..
- Design and memory…. Design and philosophy/philosophies of design…. Design and literature / literature of design….
- Design and the everyday…. Design and consumerism… Design and education….
- Designed landscapes…. Design and the environment…Design and the city….
- Design and science … Design and cybernetics ….
Please submit a 250-word abstract (maximum) and 1-page CV to: designhistoryrevolution@gmail.com
Laura Auricchio, Associate Professor of Art History and Chair of Humanities, The New School, NYC
Enfilade 
2 comments