Conference | 2026 Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife
From Historic Deerfield:
Futurecasting, Futurekeeping: New Englanders Imagine Worlds to Come
2026 Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife
Online and in-person, Historic Deerfield, Deerfield, Massachusetts, 26–27 June 2026
In-person registration closes June 22 at noon. Virtual registration will stay open through the event. All registrants receive access to recordings of the event for one month.
In 2026, the Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife will mark its 50th anniversary by looking both backwards and ahead. As this year’s seminar looks forward to its own future, we will contemplate ways residents of the region (broadly construed) have envisioned, foretold, and worked to shape various futures over the region’s long history. Events will include reflection on, and celebration of, the Seminar’s fifty years as a source of scholarship and publication on the everyday life, work, and culture of New England’s past.
f r i d a y , 2 6 j u n e

Ruthy Rogers (1778–1812), Needlework Picture, Marblehead, Massachusetts, ca. 1789, silk on linen, 27 × 23 cm (New York: American Folk Art Museum, gift of Ralph Esmerian, 2005.8.53).
10.00 Optional Morning Activity
Tours at Bellamy House and remarks from the Director, Chicopee Falls, MA (Pre-registration is required: $12 per person)
12.00 Registration opens at Historic Deerfield
1.20 Virtual sign-in opens for online attendees
1.30 Welcome — Marla Miller (Distinguished Professor of History, UMass Amherst, and President, Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife)
1.45 Panel 1 | Planned Communities
Moderator: Christian Goodwillie (Director and Curator of Special Collections, Hamilton College, Burke Library)
• Carl Guarneri (Professor Emeritus of History, Saint Mary’s College of California, and Research Scholar, Colgate University) — Brook Farm: Boston ‘Combined Households’, and the Utopian Origins of Urban Communal Housing, 1846–1851
• CJ Martin (Visiting Assistant Professor, College of the Holy Cross) — Black Millerites
• Diana Lempel (Scholar/Practitioner of Folk History) — The Blessing of the Attic: Cambridge Co-operative Housekeeping Society and Family Memory Keeping
3.15 Break with refreshments
3.30 Tribute to Founders
3:45 Futurecasting: A Roundtable on the Past, Present, and Future of New England Studies
Sponsored by the University of Massachusetts Public History Program and Historic Northampton
Moderator: J. Ritchie Garrison (Professor Emeritus, Department of History, University of Delaware)
• Emelie Gevalt (Deputy Director and Chief Curatorial and Program Officer, American Folk Art Museum)
• Thomas Guiler (Director of Museum Affairs, Oneida Community Mansion House)
• Philippe Halbert (Curator of Decorative Arts and Design, Montreal Museum of Fine Arts)
5.00 Reception
Sponsored by the American Antiquarian Society and the Boston University Program in American Studies
Join us for a celebratory reception marking the 50th anniversary of the Dublin Seminar. Enjoy heavy hors d’oeuvres and assorted beverages in the company of the Dublin Seminar membership and your colleagues for this festive occasion. (Pre-registration is $25)
7.00 Keynote Address
• Holly Jackson (Chair of American Studies and Professor of English, University of Massachusetts, Boston) — The Ends of the World in Antebellum New England
s a t u r d a y , 2 7 j u n e
8.30 Deerfield Community Center opens. In-person attendees may pick up name badges and information packets.
8:50 Virtual sign-in for online attendees
9.00 Panel 2 | Imagined Futures in Literature
Moderator: Barbara Matthews (Independent Historical Consultant)
• Megan Pickett (The Winchendon School) — ‘Where to Go Next’: Utopian Immediacy in Total Loss Farm
• Ella Koston (PhD student at Boston University’s American Studies Program) — Afrofuturist Vision: Pauline Hopkins
10.30 Break
10.45 Panel 3 | Imagined Futures in Material Culture
Moderator: Erika Gasser (Director of Academic Programs, Historic Deerfield)
• Elizabeth Eager (Assistant Professor, Southern Methodist University) — Futurity Imagined through Women’s Needlework
• Victoria Kenyon (Curatorial Track doctoral candidate, Art History, University of Delaware) — Magical Flowers: Fortune-Telling Objects from New England
• Brece Honeycutt (Independent Scholar/Multimedia Artist) — Building Harmony / Constructing Color
12.15 Lunch (buffet provided at the Deerfield Inn)
1.45 Panel 4 | Limits of Progressivism: Sexual Politics
Moderator: Erica Lome (Curator of Collections, Historic New England)
• Hunter Moskowitz (Researcher at American Ancestors, Boston) — Factory as Utopia: Imaginations of Sexuality in Early Lowell
• Catherine Terelak (Interpreter at Historic New England’s Beauport, the Sleeper-McCann House) — An Intentional Community: Gloucester’s Dabsville
• Stephen Paterwic (Trustee of the Shaker Library and Museum, Sabbathday Lake, Maine) — Shakers and the Second Gathering
3.15 Break
3.30 Panel 5 | Forecasting Future Ecologies
Moderator: Nan Wolverton (Vice President for Academic and Public Programs, American Antiquarian Society)
• Meghan Freeman (Fellowship and Internship Program Director, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University) — Bird Day, Now and Forever: Mabel Osgood Wright and the Future of New England Bird-Life
• Li-hsin Hsu (Professor of English, National Chengchi University, Taiwan) — Silk Culture, Utopian Experiment, and Anthropocene Imagination in Mid-19th-Century New England
• Dan McKanan (Emerson Senior Lecturer, Harvard Divinity School) — Imagining the Future Forest
5.00 Closing Remarks — John Davis (President, Historic Deerfield, Inc)
Enfilade Turns 17
From the Editor
Juneteenth! Father’s Day! The summer solstice! And Enfilade turns 17! You all know the ropes: buy an art book to celebrate. It’s also a fine time to renew (or begin) your HECAA membership. Thanks so much for another year.
Best for a good summer!
Craig Hanson
Call for Papers | Drawing as Knowledge: Practice, Theory, and History
From the Call for Papers:
Drawing as Knowledge: Practice, Theory, and History
Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art, London, 16–17 September 2026
Proposals due by 13 July 2026
Later this year, the Paul Mellon Centre will be able to announce the completion of the cataloguing of the archive of Deanna Petherbridge (1939–2024). Petherbridge was an artist, writer, curator, and educator, known above all for her artistic practice in and writing on drawing. To mark this moment, the Centre will also be showing a display of materials from her archive, accompanied by a number of Petherbridge’s artworks from private collections (29 July to 30 October 2026).
This follows closely on the heels of the publication in 2026 of the new Thames & Hudson edition of her landmark book, The Primacy of Drawing: Histories and Theories of Practice (first published in 2010). Petherbridge completed the revised edition as an Associate Fellow at the Warburg Institute, which also holds her celebrated ink-drawn triptych, The Destruction of Palmyra (2017).
Held in collaboration with the Warburg Institute, this conference will explore Petherbridge’s concept of “drawing as visual thinking” within the context of British art history. We are seeking proposals for 20-minute papers that engage with British drawing, in any period, and in its most diverse and international contexts.
We invite proposals on any topic, but are particularly interested in the following themes:
• the purposes and functions of drawing practice
• the significations of line, particularly, but also tone and colour
• issues of power and control in drawing as a means of knowledge formation. This could include the colonial gaze, for example, or the dynamics of the life class
• drawing as a means of knowing the human body
• the role of drawing in understanding people, including the drawing of portraits within social gatherings, for example, or caricature and satire
• the role of drawing in understanding and interpreting the natural world, from the molecular to the celestial
• drawing as a prominent technology in interpreting landscapes, through topographical practice
• drawing as a means of knowing the built environment
• the role of drawing in understanding the imagination, creativity and expression
We welcome contributions from across disciplines and professional fields, as long as the proposal is focused on drawing within artistic practice, as a means of knowledge formation.
Please submit the following to events@paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk with the subject line “CFP Drawing as Knowledge”:
• An abstract (450 word maximum) describing your proposed contribution
• A 250-word biography
Please combine your abstract and biography into a single Word document and send it as an email attachment before Monday, 13 July 2026, 11.59pm (BST). Incomplete or late submissions will not be considered. Successful contributors will receive a speaker’s fee of £200, and reasonable travel and accommodation costs will be covered. If you have any access requirements, please let us know.
New Book | Picture Democracy
As previously noted here at Enfilade, Wolf Burchard co-curated the exhibition Revolution! now on view at The Met. He also has just published this small book, from Thornwillow Press:
Wolf Burchard, Picture Democracy (Newburgh, New York: Thornwillow Press, 2026), 80 pages, $65.
What did power look like before 1776? This is the question Wolf Burchard asks in Picture Democracy. His answer unfolds through three iconic portraits of George III, Louis XVI, and George Washington and reveals just how radical the American experiment truly was. If kings had long been portrayed through the established language of majesty, inherited authority, and divine right, how was one to portray the leader of a republic?
At the center of the book is Gilbert Stuart’s great Lansdowne portrait of Washington, a painting that helped invent a new visual language for democratic leadership. But how do you portray a president? Washington was the first of his kind, so there was no established formula comparable to that employed in the depictions of other heads of state, kings, queens, emperors, and popes. Picture Democracy is about such people of power, and how some of the supreme artistic exponents of their time tried to convey that power through portraiture. It tells the story of three likenesses of three men—George III, Louis XVI, and George Washington—who never met in person, but who for decades had almost daily interactions with one another, or were, at the very least, on each other’s minds.
Wolf Burchard is Curator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, where he joined the Department of European Sculpture and Decorative Arts in 2019, after holding curatorial positions at the British Royal Collection and the National Trust. Much of his work focuses on the relationship between art and power. In 2026, he co-curated Revolution! at The Met, an exhibition marking the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, and The Rediscovered Treasure of the Sun King, at the Grand Palais in Paris. He also co-organized the exhibition The First Georgians: Art and Monarchy, 1714–1760, shown at The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace to mark the tercentenary of the Hanoverian succession in 2014, and published The Sovereign Artist: Charles Le Brun and the Image of Louis XIV (2016).
New Book | Women, Gardens, and Agency in Imperial Russia
From Bloomsbury:
Ekaterina Heath, Women, Gardens, and Agency in Imperial Russia: Empress Maria Feodorovna’s Pavlovsk Park (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2026), 144 pages, ISBN: 978-1350544505, £45 / $62.
How does a woman with no formal political authority influence the politics of an empire? Through her garden.
In the hierarchies of the late 18th- and early 19th-century Russian imperial court, a consort held no direct access to power. Yet Empress Maria Feodorovna, wife of Paul I and later Dowager Empress during the reign of Alexander I, influenced the politics of her era through the cultivation of Pavlovsk Park near St Petersburg. Women, Gardens, and Agency in Imperial Russia draws on the rich historical record of the Russian royal court to recover the evidence of her agency. Heath traces Maria Feodorovna’s strategies for maintaining access to power under Catherine II and Paul I, and examines how, widowed and formally sidelined, she used Pavlovsk to consolidate influence during her son’s reign, turning a garden into a panopticon, a memorial, and a vehicle for rewriting history.
Ekaterina Heath is a Research Associate at the University of Sydney, specialising in garden studies and Russian history of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Her earlier work includes essays on Grand Tour memory at Pavlovsk and on plants as diplomatic gifts in British-Russian relations.
c o n t e n t s
Introduction
1 Imperial Family: Building Bridges
2 Plants in the Garden: Growing the Power Base
3 Diplomacy: Weaving the Networks of Power
4 Grief: Turning Defeat into Victory
5 Pavlovsk Panopticon: Arguing against Abolishing Serfdom
6 Charity: Creating Legacy through Rewriting History
Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
Conference | Theatricality and Garden Art
From ArtHist.net:
Theatralität und Gartenkunst: Vom 17. bis ins frühe 19. Jahrhundert
Weimar, 25–27 June 2026
Internationale und interdisziplinäre Tagung vom 25. bis 27. Juni 2026 im Vortragssaal des Goethe- und Schiller-Archivs und Festsaal des Goethe-Nationalmuseums, Weimar
Veranstaltungen im Rahmen der Tagung
• Goethes und Schröters Die Fischerin. Eine Promenade in Tiefurt, 26. Juni 2026, 16 Uhr (Park Tiefurt bei Weimar)
• Konzert: Kammermusik aus der Epoche der Empfindsamkeit, am Freitag 26. Juni 2026, 19.30 Uhr, Festsaal im Goethe-Nationalmuseum in Weimar
In Kooperation mit der Klassik Stiftung Weimar und der Goethe-Gesellschaft Weimar. Gefördert durch Daimler und Benz-Stiftung und DFG
Organisation und Kontakt
Anna Axtner-Borsutzky, a.axtner-borsutzky@lmu.de
Helena Langewitz, helena.langewitz@uni-mainz.de
d o n n e r s t a g , 2 5 j u n i
13.30 Anna Axtner-Borsutzky und Helena Langewitz — Begrüßung
13.45 Gartenanlagen von Versailles bis Wörlitz
Moderation: Astrid Dröse und Anna Axtner-Borsutzky
• Stefan Schweizer (Düsseldorf) — Zur Praxis des Wassertheaters. Von der Villa Aldobrandini über das Wassertheater in Versailles bis zur Wilhelmshöhe in Kassel
• Hendrik Ziegler (Marburg) — Versailles in Wörlitz. Barocke Theatralität im Garten der Aufklärung
• Natalie Gutgesell (Lichtenfels/Berlin) — Zum Luisenkloster in Weimar
16.30 Franziska Rieland (Klassik Stiftung) — Der Tiefurter und der Herzogliche Park in Weimar: schöner Effekt, dichterische Vision und inszenierte Natur — Mit Führung im Ilmpark
f r e i t a g , 2 6 j u n i
9.30 Gartenanlagen von Weimar und Umgebung
Moderation: Helena Langewitz und Klaus Pietschmann
• Anna Axtner-Borsutzky (München) — Kulissen aus Kisten und Worten. Gartentheorie und -praxis auf der Bühne um 1800
• Anna Ananieva (Weimar) — Gartenräume als Spielräume. August von Kotzebue und die Theatralität des Gartens um 1800
• Antonia Weiss (Amsterdam) — The Right to Look: Gender in the Visual Regime of Berlin‘s Tiergarten, 1740–1830
• Jana Kittelmann (Dessau-Wörlitz) — Vulkane, Venus, Warnaltar. Zur Inszenierung von Natur und Kunst in den Wörlitzer Anlagen
13.00 Mittagspause und tagungsinterner Transfer nach Tiefurt
15.00 Angelika Schneider (Klassik Stiftung Weimar) — Führung in Tiefurt
16.00 Promenade mit Goethes und Corona Schroeters Die Fischerin im Park
19.30 Musikalische Abendveranstaltung im Goethe-Nationalmuseum
Moderation: Helena Langewitz und Anna Axtner-Borsutzky
• „Gewitternacht“ — Konzert mit Gunta Smirnova (Gesang) und Mikayel Balyan (Klavier)
s a m s t a g , 2 7 j u n i
9.30 Musik, Theater, Virtual Reality
Moderation: Sunna Kroy und Amelie Fenske
• Joachim Kremer (Stuttgart) — Außerhalb des Protokolls? Garten und Natur bei Hasse, Paisiello und Haydn
• Helena Langewitz (Mainz) — Deutsche Gärten auf der Opernbühne? Zur Konstruktion national konnotierter Gartenszenen in Günther von Schwarzburg (1776) und Rosamunde (1780)
• Esma Cerkovnik (Zürich) — Gärten der Täuschung. Zur Gartenszenerie in der Musik um 1800
• Alisa Winkens (Stuttgart) — Schauplatz Gartentheater. Molières Bühne für La Princesse d‘Élide (1664) in Versailles und in Virtual Reality
• Leonie Matt (Mainz) — Zwischen Théâtre d‘eau, Théâtre de fleurs und Théâtre pour jouer la Comédie. Theatrale Gartenschauplätze in der Gartentheorie des frühen 18. Jahrhunderts
• Hartmut Troll (Bundesgärten AT) — Theatrum terrae. Aspekte der Gartenkunst der Aufklärung am Beispiel der Schlossgärten Schwetzingen und Schönbrunn
Colloquium | Visualizing Antiquity: The Copy of the Copy
From ArtHist.net:
Visualizing Antiquity: On the Episteme of Early Modern Drawings and Prints V:
The Copy of the Copy … of the Copy: Techniques of Pictorial Reception of
Antiquity in the Early Modern Period
Online and in-person, Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 3 July 2026
Organized by Elisabeth Décultot, Arnold Nesselrath, Cristina Ruggero, and Timo Strauch

Various early modern depictions of Harpocrates (the Greek form of the Egyptian child-god Horus).
In virtually all areas of human creativity, the outcomes—whether intentional or not—are subject to the principle of repetition. Likewise, in the history of acquisition of knowledge about antiquity, what has once been recorded in writing or in images regularly becomes the starting point for reproduction. The information gathered at the beginning of the line of transmission is henceforth copied and disseminated for as long as there is a need for it, with the copies themselves often becoming multipliers through replication. In this context, copies by no means function merely as duplicates in a subordinate hierarchical relationship to the ‘original’. In chains of transmission that are usually preserved only in fragments, and often in the absence of the lost ‘original’, copies are rather a standard of transmission and thus offer crucial insights into historical processes, illustrate methodological strategies and promote epistemic understanding by making visible the continuous engagement with ancient models. The fifth colloquium in the series, Visualizing Antiquity: On the Episteme of Early Modern Drawings and Prints focuses on diverse processes of copying in the graphic arts and examines the role of copies as powerful resources of knowledge in the context of the preservation, transmission and creative transformation of concepts of antiquity.
Admission is free, with the required registration available here. Online access will be available here.
p r o g r a m m e
12.30 Welcome and Introduction — Elisabeth Décultot (Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg) and Cristina Ruggero (BBAW)
12.45 On the Theories of Copies
Chair: Elisabeth Décultot (Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg)
• Arianna Farina (Università degli Studi Suor Orsola Benincasa, Naples), Reproducing Art: the Copy as an Epistemic Device
1.15 Antiquities in Academic Contexts
Chair: Tommaso Gristina (Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome)
• Lorenzo Giammattei (Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome), Learning Antiquity through Copies: Vincenzo Camuccini and the Transmission of Classical Models in Private Roman Academies
• Susanne Müller-Bechtel (Munich/Würzburg), Das akademische Aktstudium – ein wichtiger Multiplikator der bildlichen Antikenrezeption
Coffee Break
2.45 (Mis-)Interpretations of Antiquity
Chair: Timo Strauch (BBAW)
• Anna Carrarini (Zentralinstitut für Kunstgeschichte, Munich), Copy or Creature? Die druckgraphische Verfremdung der Kapitolinischen Wölfin
• Ana Sofia Pinto (Marta Rocha Moreira / CENP, FAUP, Porto), Around the ‘tripode’: The Roman Meal, Revisited
• Norbert Franken (Berlin), Fallstudien: Stiche und Zeichnungen verschollener Altertümer im kritischen Vergleich
Coffee Break
4.45 Antique Architecture in Copy Chains in Drawing and Print
Chair: Arnold Nesselrath (Rome)
• Elena Efimova (Lomonossow University, Moscow), Les copies des dessins de la Renaissance par les maîtres du cercle de Cassiano dal Pozzo dans un album du XVIIe siècle à Saint-Pétersbourg
• Ruggero De Blasi (Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa), Representing Obelisks in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Roman Prints: Practices of Copying and Reconfiguration
• Ana Šverko (Cvito Fisković Centre and University, Split), The Copy of a Transformed Original. The Temple of Jupiter in Split and a Case of Graphic Transmission
6.15 Closing Discussion
New Book | What Was America?
Coming this fall from Yale UP:
Elise Armani and Katy Siegel, What Was America? Art, Culture, and Politics in the Bicentennial Era (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2026), 224 pages, ISBN: 978-0300284430, $65.
In 1976 the United States celebrated its two hundredth year with festivals, exhibitions, works of art, and historical initiatives. Over a decade, planning for the Bicentennial spanned postwar prosperity, political activism, and, toward the end, fear of national decline. The social alchemy of these conditions produced a national investment in shared cultural experience never matched before or since. Across wildly disparate venues, demographics, interests, presidencies, and geographies, Bicentennial cultural production contended with community, the environment, immigration, heritage, technology, and what it meant to be American. This outpouring of projects both reflected and drove national debates, eliciting mass participation in negotiating US history and imagining the nation’s future.
What Was America? offers a prismatic view of American art and culture in the years leading up to 1976. Ten fascinating case studies examine the individual efforts of artists such as Benny Andrews; blockbuster exhibitions, including A Nation of Nations at the Smithsonian; and popular community projects such as protest quilts and time capsules. The authors consider issues that remain highly relevant today and offer new perspectives on the possibilities for art’s social role, exploring its use in defining the nation’s past and future, its purpose and its people.
Elise Armani is assistant curator of twentieth-century art at the Joslyn Art Museum in Omaha. Katy Siegel is the Eugene V. and Clare E. Thaw Endowed Chair in Modern American Art at Stony Brook University.
Exhibition | America at 250

Thomas Sully, The Passage of the Delaware, 1819, oil on canvas, 147 × 207 inches
(Museum of Fine Arts Boston, 03.1079)
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Opening soon at the MFABoston:
America at 250
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, opening 19 June 2026
The MFA’s major reinstallation of the 18th-century Art of the Americas galleries will integrate art from across North, Central, and South America, and the Caribbean—including works by Native American and Indigenous makers—to present a broader view of cultural exchange across the continent during a pivotal time in history. The galleries feature more than 400 objects—including icons of the MFA’s collection, long unseen works, and new acquisitions—that range from the monumental to the miniature.

Paul Revere Jr., Sons of Liberty Bowl, 1768, silver (MFA Boston).
A silver bowl. A Founding Father memorialized at monumental scale. A charismatic silversmith considering his craft. A towering mahogany desk and bookcase. Certain paintings, sculptures, decorative arts, and works on paper from the MFA’s Art of the Americas art collection, along with the artists who created them, played a pivotal role in shaping the early history of the United States. Today, as we approach 250 years since the country’s founding, they likewise have a unique ability to recount and reflect that history while also inviting us to reconsider it.
Coinciding with the 250th anniversary of American Independence, the MFA is reimagining its 18th-century galleries on level one of the Art of the Americas Wing for the first time since they opened in 2010. The new display, which opens in June 2026, brings together works from across the Americas—integrating Native and non-native, North, South, and Central American, and Caribbean art—and explores how artists have contributed to, or in some cases resisted, ideas of nationhood and identity. Visitors can immerse themselves in a range of stories and experiences, discovering the interconnectedness of the Americas and its history, institutions, and people.
Gilbert Stuart’s unfinished portrait of George Washington (1796)—the foundational image of the nation’s first president in the public imagination—offers viewers a prescient reminder that democracy is constant work in progress. An early piece of American protest art, Paul Revere’s Sons of Liberty Bowl (1768) honors a group of Massachusetts rebels who paved the way for the Revolution. A ceramic jar (1857) by the enslaved potter and poet David Drake exemplifies literacy as an act of resistance in the decades before the Civil War. Thomas Sully drew on artistic traditions of heroism for The Passage of the Delaware (1819), which portrays George Washington in a dramatic scene of bravery. Meanwhile, a recently acquired work by Alan Michelson, a Mohawk member of Six Nations of the Grand River, offers a contemporary critique of Washington, who was known to the Mohawk Nation as ‘Town Destroyer’. These and the many other works on view reveal a past in dialogue with the present and propose endless possibilities for assessing history as we look ahead to the future.
Exhibition | Revolutionary Women

Excelsior with Allegorical Figures of Liberty and Justice, late 18th century.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
This summer the museum will also present its own unique copy of the Declaration, as Jennifer Schuessler reports in The New York Times (5 June 2026) . . .
“For generations, the institution (formerly the New-York Historical Society) has quietly held a rare, unattributed broadside of the Declaration, one of only a handful with no printer’s name attached. From June 18 to July 5, it will be on public display for the first time, along with a tentative attribution, to a New York City printer named Samuel Loudon.”
From the press release for the exhibition:
Revolutionary Women
The New York Historical, 29 May — 25 October 2026
Curated by Anna Danziger Halperin, Tessa Bangs, Isabelle Held, Rachel Pitkin, and Lauren Cain
Commemorating the nation’s semiquincentennial year, The New York Historical presents Revolutionary Women, a new exhibition on view in the Joyce B. Cowin Women’s History Gallery. Moving beyond the myths and legends that have long shaped narratives of the American founding, this exhibition draws on extensive research in The Historical’s Patricia D. Klingenstein Library to illuminate the lives of the women who helped define the American experiment. Through the close examination of overlooked primary sources—including letters, financial ledgers, and archaeological artifacts such as shoe soles and children’s toys excavated from military camps—Revolutionary Women reconstructs a compelling, evidence-based reappraisal of the 18th century, positioning women as central actors in the political, social, and economic transformations of the era.
“To understand the history of our nation, we must look at what is revealed in the margins of the traditional narrative,” said Dr. Louise Mirrer, president and CEO, The New York Historical. “This exhibition moves past symbolism to center the real expertise and labor of women who navigated a world of blurred allegiances to help found the United States. By unearthing these hidden contributions, we hope to shift how the American Revolution is understood for generations to come.”
At its core, the exhibition cuts through 250 years of mythmaking to reveal the documented realities behind iconic Revolutionary-era women. It spotlights figures such as Deborah Sampson, whose story of military enlistment was amplified in early print culture, alongside Abigail Adams and Phillis Wheatley Peters, who wielded Enlightenment ideals to expose the contradictions of a male-dominated republic. The exhibition also dismantles enduring legends like ‘Molly Pitcher’, revealing the figure likely to have been a composite of several women, including Margaret Corbin (‘Captain Molly’), the first woman to receive a federal pension after being wounded in combat, as confirmed by military and Board of War records. Drawing on rich archival evidence, including a public tribute from George Washington to widows who helped American prisoners, Revolutionary Women replaces folklore with a vivid, verifiable account of women’s central role in the time of America’s founding.
Using the New York region as a microcosm of the broader struggle for independence, the exhibition reveals the breadth of women’s economic and civic influence in a contested landscape. As men went to war, women assumed control of businesses, carried intelligence across military lines, and sustained the conflict through medical and logistical support. Archival materials, including the business records of merchant Mary Alexander, underscore women’s longstanding participation in transatlantic trade networks. Evidence from early ledgers of the Tontine Coffee House—the heart of early New York’s financial district—further documents women such as Rebecca Gomez as active investors and stakeholders, offering a powerful corrective to narratives that have long excluded women from the growing early American financial system.
For women of color and Indigenous women, whose voices were often suppressed by dominant narratives, Revolutionary Women reinterprets traditional sources to foreground their agency and resilience, telling the story of individuals like Elizabeth ‘Mumbet’ Freeman, whose court case, Brom and Bett v. Ashley (1781), set the legal precedent to abolish slavery in Massachusetts. Molly Brant, a Mohawk woman of the Wolf Clan, chose loyalty to the British over the Revolutionary forces, believing that it offered the best chance to protect Haudenosaunee lands from colonial expansion. The letter granting Brant a pension from the British government for her diplomatic service is on view. Meanwhile, soldiers’ orderly books and diaries from the Sullivan Campaign, while recording the destruction of Haudenosaunee lands, inadvertently preserve evidence of Indigenous women’s agricultural knowledge and authority.
Personal relationships are also explored in the exhibition. On display is a love poem written by Patriot Major Aquila Giles, who met his future wife, Eliza Shipton, the niece of a Loyalist, after he was captured. The star-crossed lovers secretly exchanged letters, and eloped in 1780 to thwart their impending separation. A woman’s shoe sole, children’s toys, and other archaeological evidence mark the presence of women and children in military camps and in occupied New York.
In the post-war years, women turned to the emerging legal system to assert their rights and redefine the boundaries of citizenship. Court records and legal depositions, like the property lawsuits of Elizabeth Rutgers, who sued for back rent when her brewery was occupied during the British occupation, demonstrate that women actively challenged the limits of the law.
The exhibition concludes by examining how women played a decisive role in building the social and economic infrastructure of the new nation. In the absence of robust public services, they established philanthropic and educational institutions that bound the city and nation together, while their wealth and labor provided an invisible backbone to the early republic’s economy. Acting as traders, financial participants, and diplomatic intermediaries, women sustained the nation’s daily operations, an often unrecognized foundation that Revolutionary Women brings to light, recasting their expertise as central rather than peripheral to the Revolutionary era. Through materials ranging from a sampler made at the New-York African Free-School to a portrait of Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton, a founder of the Orphan Asylum Society—Revolutionary Women ultimately challenges audiences to reconsider whose stories endure, and to ask a vital question: How would you tell the story of the Revolution?
Revolutionary Women is curated by Anna Danziger Halperin, director for the Center for Women’s History; Tessa Bangs, Mellon Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow in Women’s History and Public History; Isabelle Held, Mellon Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow in Gender and LGBTQ+ History; and Rachel Pitkin and Lauren Cain, both Mellon Foundation Predoctoral Awardees in Women’s History.



















leave a comment