New Book | Images of the Plant Humanities
From Bloomsbury:
Danielle Sands and Daniel Whistler, eds., Images of the Plant Humanities: Theory, Art, and the Botanic Gaze (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2026), 352 pages, ISBN: 978-1350502611, $120. Also available as an ebook.
Exploring the words and images used to represent plants, this interdisciplinary book examines how vegetal life has been theorised both in the contemporary plant humanities, a developing field of research which aims to rectify the traditional neglect of plants as a model for thinking, and in Western modernity more generally.
Focusing on the varied ways that the vegetal has been represented, misrepresented, or even hidden, during modernity, it studies how philosophical, scientific and environmental theories, as well as colonial histories, have determined these representations, as well as how these representations have themselves influenced theory. Bringing aesthetic depictions of plant life into conversation with philosophical, cultural, literary, and scientific thinking, it looks to return our attention to vegetal life, and to challenge traditional assumptions regarding plant intelligence, agency, and communication.
Danielle Sands is Associate Professor of Comparative Literature and Culture at Royal Holloway, University of London.
Daniel Whistler is Professor of Philosophy, Royal Holloway, University of London. He is author of Schelling’s Theory of Symbolic Language: Forming the System of Identity (2013) and co-author of The Right to Wear Religious Symbols (2013).
c o n t e n t s
Part One | Understanding Plant Monsters
1 ‘What a Strange Prodigy’: The Welwitschia mirabilis — Katherine Arnold (University of Liverpool)
2 No Monsters Here: Vegetable Teratology and Plant Horror — Stella Sandford (Manchester Metropolitan University)
3 Abnormal Plants and Anomalous Arts: Troubling the Non/Human Norm — Aliya Say (Independent scholar)
4 The ‘Plant Horror’ of Turpin’s Urpflanze and Hooker’s Welwitschia: Narratives of Monstrous Proliferation and Grotesque Hybridity — Caroline Harris (Royal Holloway, University of London)
Part Two | Narrating Plant Desires
5 Thinking Sex with Plants: The Speculative Sexualities of Enlightenment Botany — Natania Meeker (University of Southern California)
6 Fern Tongues: A Pteridomaniac’s Imagination of Vegetal Time and Desire — Solvejg Nitzke (Ruhr-University Bochum)
7 Dragon Arum: A Phytopoetic Gaze on Vegetal Violence and Eroticism — Joela Jacobs (University of Arizona)
8 The Quest for the Blue Flower: The Legacy of German Romanticism in Three Contemporary Novels — Isabel Kranz (University for Applied Arts, Vienna)
Part Three | Rediscovering Plant Agency
9 The Temporality of Titan Arum — John C. Ryan (University of Notre Dame, Australia)
10 Prickly-Pairs: On Humans, Plants, and Technicity — Ed Thornton (Independent Researcher)
11 Extending the Botanical: Agency, Abstraction, and Contemporary Plant Drawing — Danielle Sands (Royal Holloway, University of London)
Part Four | Resituating Plants Ecologically
12 Undoing the Hollow Space of Representation: Margaret Mee’s Plant Portraits in the Kew Collection — Yota Batsaki (Dumbarton Oaks, Harvard University)
13 Papa and Kuka: A Biocultural Exploration of Two Andean Crops — Nataly Allasi Canales (University of Copenhagen, Denmark/Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) and Kim Walker (Royal Holloway, University of London/Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew)
14 Lacebark and the Interior Décor of the Jamaican Slave Cottage — Steeve Buckridge (Grand Valley State University)
15 Humboldt and Bonpland’s Essay on the Geography of Plants: The Other Side of the Physical Tableau of the Andes — Quentin Hiernaux (Université libre de Bruxelles)
Part Five | Redrawing Plant Boundaries
16 ‘Here Nature stopped half-way’: Waterlilies and the Foliar Theory of the Flower — Ulrich Stegmann (University of Aberdeen)
17 The Place of Algae in Experimental Natural Histories — Joan Steigerwald (University of York)
18 A ‘Funeral Oration’ for Lichenology? — Lydia Azadpour (University of Nottingham)
Part Six | Representing Plants Otherwise
19 This Is Not a Brugmansia — Giovanni Aloi (Independent Researcher)
20 Ginkgo and Dark Botany — Prudence Gibson (University of New South Wales, Sydney) and Maya Martin-Westheimer (University of New South Wales)
21 Anna Atkins’ Cyanotypes: Gestures for Hands Driven by Sunlight — Redell Olsen (Royal Holloway, University of London)
22 The Ecology of Plant Iconography — Laurence Hill (Independent Artist)
Part Seven | Reimagining Plant Forms
23 Blue So Deep — Ben Woodard (Independent Researcher)
24 Containing Nature in the Leaves of a Book: Botany, Bibliography, and the Embodiment of Thought — Thomas Moynihan (University of Cambridge)
25 Drawing the Urpflanze: Goethe, Arber, Grothendieck — Sophie Gerber (University of Bordeaux)
Afterword: The Library and Archives at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew — Julia Buckley (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew)
Call for Papers | Home/Work: Constructing Domesticities
From the Call for Papers:
Home/Work: Constructing Domesticities
The Mary L. Cornille Annual Boston University Graduate Symposium
Boston University and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 9–10 April 2027
Organized by Isabella Dobson and Megan Horn
Proposals due by 8 January 2027
The Mary L. Cornille (GRS’87) 43rd Annual Boston University Graduate Symposium in the History of Art & Architecture invites submissions which explore how homes and domestic cultures are imagined and constructed through material and visual culture.
A home is more than just a residence, location, or a building. Architects and designers might design houses and housing to structure domestic life, but to call a place ‘home’ often indicates individual senses of belonging, identity, and private experience. Homes are also related to work, whether as sites of labor or as imagined reprieves from it. Inhabitants, including families, communities, and laborers, construct domestic life through the work of creating, acquiring, or routinely using visual and material objects. However, homes and their domestic visual and material cultures are not immune from outside influence. Ideologies regarding nationality, citizenship, gender, class, or race shape ideas about what kinds of people, objects, and activities belong at home. Furthermore, visual and material culture and representations of domestic life also provide insight into how the idea of home has been negotiated, reimagined, and challenged over time.
Possible subjects include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Domestic roles: parenthood, caregiving, childhood, servitude, labor, enslavement, animal domestication, multigenerational families, communal living
• Domestic objects: furniture, textiles, clothing, dining wares, decorative arts, jewelry, technology (TVs, radio, laundry machine, etc.), ephemera (magazines, newspapers, advertisements, etc.)
• Domestic space: architecture, vernacular architecture, kitchens, bedrooms, bathrooms, dining rooms, gardens, suburban/urban/rural, speculative or imagined blueprints/plans, design styles (Bauhaus, minimalism, Arts and Crafts movement, etc.), public vs. private, house museums
• Domestic ideologies: labor, race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, nationality, femininity, masculinity, immigration, politics, citizenship, faith/religion
We welcome submissions from graduate students at all stages of study and from any area of study. Papers must be original and previously unpublished. Please send an abstract (300 words or fewer), a paper title, and a CV to artsymp@bu.edu. The deadline for submissions is 8 January 2027. Selected speakers will be notified by early February. Papers should be no longer than 15 minutes in length and will be followed by a question and answer session. The symposium will be held at Boston University on Friday, 9 April and at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston on Saturday, 10 April 2027. Please note that we do not cover travel costs for speakers.
This event is generously sponsored by Mary L. Cornille (GRS’87). For additional information, please visit our website.
At Christie’s | Vigée Le Brun’s Portrait of Her Daughter
From the press release (30 October 2026) . . .
Old Masters Evening Sale
Christie’s, London, 8 December 2026
Old Masters Sale, Part I, #24953
Christie’s, New York, 3 February 2027

Elisabeth-Louise Vigée Le Brun, Julie Le Brun as a Bather (estimate: $1.8–2.2million).
Christie’s announced that paintings from a distinguished private collection including works by Osias Beert, Jan Massys, Henri-Pierre Danloux, Jan van Huysum, Jan van Os, and Mihály Munkácsy will be offered in London’s Old Master Evening Sale on 8 December, and Old Master Paintings, Part I in New York on 3 February 2027. Highlights will tour to Paris (on view until 4 November) and London (4–8 December), ahead of the auctions.
The lead lot of the group comes to auction for the very first time in more than two centuries: Julie Le Brun as a Bather by Elisabeth-Louise Vigée Le Brun. This important work returned to public view as part of the landmark retrospective dedicated to Vigée Le Brun at the Grand Palais in Paris and the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York in 2015 and 2016 (estimate: $1.8–2.2million).
The subject of the painting is Jeanne-Julie-Louise Le Brun (1780–1819), called Julie, the only child of Elisabeth-Louise Vigée Le Brun (1755–1842), one of Europe’s most celebrated portraitists in the late-18th and early-19th centuries, and Jean-Baptiste-Pierre Le Brun (1748–1813), the preeminent dealer, auctioneer, and art expert in Paris during the final decades of the Ancien Régime. Vigée Le Brun was one of the few women artists to be elected to the Académie Royale in Paris, in 1783 and served as the official portraitist to Queen Marie Antoinette before fleeing France at the outbreak of the French Revolution and achieving international fame across Europe.

Henri Pierre Danloux, The Masters Foster, 1792 (estimate: £150,000–250,000).
This painting was executed in 1792, when artist and daughter were living in exile in Italy. This striking image of Julie was acquired through the intermediary of Jean-Baptiste Greuze by the Russian nobleman and art collector Prince Nikolai Borisovich Yusupov, in whose family it remained until the 20th century. It is unlined and preserved in a near-miraculous state.
Vigée Le Brun painted images of Julie throughout her childhood and adolescence, most famously in two double portraits featuring mother and daughter in a tender embrace which are among the most beloved works in the Louvre. As with earlier portraits of her daughter, Vigée drew from a rich visual tradition when crafting Julie’s pose for this painting.
Also painted in 1792 whilst in exile from Revolutionary Paris, Henri-Pierre Danloux’s charming double portrait of the sons of Constantia and Richard Foster, with cricket bats in a wooded landscape, launched his career in London when it was exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1793. Further highlights include a beautifully rendered still-life by Jan van Huysum, which will tour with the Le Brun to Paris, and Mihály Munkácsy’s After Dessert–Die Jungen Hunde, painted around 1890.
Exhibition | HER STORY: Women Artists of the Albertina

Maria Christina of Habsburg-Lorraine after Jean Siméon Chardin, Lady with Book, 1760s/1770s, 20.9 × 25.5 cm, watercolour, body colours on vellum (Vienna: Albertina).
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
From the press release for the exhibition:
HER STORY: Women Artists of the Albertina / Künstlerinnen der Albertina
Albertina Museum, Vienna, 30 October 2026 — 14 February 2027
Curated by Elisabeth Dutz, Katharina Hövelmann, Elsy Lahner, and Eva Michel
To mark its 250th anniversary, the Albertina is—for the first time—devoting an exhibition to the history of the women artists represented in its collection, thereby retelling the history of art. Spanning the period from the 16th century to the 1970s, the exhibition demonstrates the decisive role women have played in shaping the development of art, even though their contributions long remained invisible or were forgotten.

Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun, A Young Woman Drawing the Portrait of a Girl, ca. 1790–95, 36.9 × 26.6 cm, black and white chalk (Vienna: Albertina).
Women artists have always been a part of art history—but their work has seldom received the recognition it deserves. This epoch-spanning exhibition takes stock for the first time of the women artists in the Albertina’s collection, presenting works from five centuries: from drawings and prints by early engravers and publishers, which were collected by Duke Albert of Saxe-Teschen and Archduchess Maria Christina of Habsburg-Lorraine themselves, to modern artists and pioneering feminist artists of the 1970s. Through their biographies, Her Story presents women artists as commited, enterprising, and self-directed protagonists. At the same time, through a series of thematic chapters, the exhibition explores the social conditions that shaped women’s artistic production, offering a fresh perspective on art history through the lens of the collection.
The exhibition is based on a research project initiated by the Albertina’s new General Director, Ralph Gleis, focusing on women artists across all areas of the museum’s collections. The result is a remarkable diversity and considerable number of outstanding works, many of which have rarely, if ever, been shown.
In keeping with the Albertina Museum’s collection history, and with only a few exceptions, Her Story focuses on drawings and prints, featuring works by Maria Sibylla Merian, Rachel Ruysch, Rosalba Carriera, Angelika Kauffmann, Berthe Morisot, Käthe Kollwitz, Sonia Delaunay, Louise Bourgeois, and Maria Lassnig.
The exhibition’s timeline extends to the late 1970s, as most of the collection’s blind spots date from earlier eras. Analyzing the holdings and biographies raises recurring questions: Under what circumstances was it possible for women to receive an artistic education and work professionally? How did women manage to make their art visible, and how did they build networks? What possibilities opened up for them, and what restrictions remained? How did departure, persecution, and exile inform their careers—and how lasting was their recognition? From these questions developed the ten chapters of our exhibition. Rather than following a chronology of epochs and styles, it offers perspectives on artistic practice and historical conditions.
Elisabeth Dutz, Ralph Gleis, Katharina Hövelmann, Elsy Lahner, and Eva Michel, HER STORY: Women Artists of the Albertina (Munich: Hirmer Verlag, 2026), 352 pages, ISBN: 978-3777448473, €40 / $60.
New Book | D’Eon: The Wonder of Her Sex
From Bloomsbury (with 20% off for a limited time with discount code GLR BD8) . . .
Jonathan Conlin, D’Eon: The Wonder of Her Sex (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2026), 256 pages, ISBN: 979-8216493648 (hardback), $175 / ISBN: 979-8216493655 (paperback), $44. Also available as an ebook.
Jonathan Conlin, “States of Transition: The Chevalière d’Eon and Her Portrait Prints, 1764–91,” Eighteenth Century Studies 59.4 (2026). Open-access for a limited time only, via this link.
Author, envoy, soldier, spy, the Chevalière d’Eon (1728–1810) crossed boundaries of sex and nation, moving between Britain and France, presenting as a man and as a woman. For fifty years, in peace and in war, the Chevalière served the French crown as secret agent, censor, dragoon officer and diplomat. She spent the following thirty years as a celebrity, famed for giving virtuoso displays of swordswomanship wearing her signature black dress.
D’Eon presented as a woman forced by her parents and Louis XV to adopt male costume. After her transition contemporaries hailed d’Eon as “the wonder of her sex”, impressed by her achievements on the battlefield and in the chancelleries of Europe. As Mary Wollstonecraft and Olympe de Gouges both noted, d’Eon showed what emancipated women could do. Within weeks of d’Eon’s death, however, curious Londoners could buy coloured stipple engravings of her genitalia. For many observers, then and since, d’Eon’s identity was reduced to this post-mortem encounter with her anatomy. The mystery of her sex (now “solved”) replaced the wonder of her sex.
D’Eon was the subject of many prints during her lifetime. Until recently it was assumed that she was the passive victim of these representations. As Conlin reveals in a new article in the journal Eighteenth Century Studies, however, d’Eon had a hand in the production of several of these mezzotints and engravings. His article explores how d’Eon used prints to experiment with new female avatars (including that of a latter-day Pallas emerging bare-breasted from her tent), several years before d’Eon wore female-coded costume in public, at her 1777 presentation to Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI.
D’Eon was just as eager to shape how she was presented in text, feeding articles to the press and pursuing public querelles with Beaumarchais and others. A prolific author, she sold her life story to two publishers, yet failed to submit a manuscript. This was not for want of effort: D’Eon wrote her life story, over and over, in a variety of genres: as Rousseau-style confession, as dialogue, as epistolary exchange and as galanterie. Her story is a picaresque masquerade of the ancien régime. It is a Christian conversion narrative. It is a chapter in a new history of femmes fortes and trans saints. Aware of the tensions between these stories, unable or unwilling to let one version define her, d’Eon spent thirty years in a labyrinth of her own construction. No trans woman has left us such a large archive of life writings, or lived her life on such an epic scale.
Professor of History at the University of Southampton, Jonathan Conlin began working on the Chevalier d’Eon in 2001, exploring the analogies between d’Eon and the English journalist and radical, John Wilkes. He co-edited The Chevalier d’Eon and His Worlds (Bloomsbury, 2010) with Simon Burrows, Valerie Mainz and Russell Goulbourne. More recent books include the authorized bicentenary history of the National Gallery (London) and The Met: A History of a Museum and Its People (Columbia University Press, 2025). He is currently organizing a play, exhibition, and digitisation project intended to commemorate d’Eon’s tercentenary in 2028.
New Book | The Profaned Pencil
From Reaktion Books, with distribution in the US by The University of Chicago Press:
Helen Pierce, The Profaned Pencil: A History of British Political Caricature, 1600–1860 (London: Reaktion Books, 2026), 320 pages, ISBN: 978-1836392859, £29 / $42.
The first comprehensive survey of the rise of political caricature in the United Kingdom.
The Profaned Pencil surveys the vivid and unruly world of British political caricature between 1600 and 1860. It follows the rise of graphic satire from polemical seventeenth-century broadsides to the exuberant prints of the Georgian era and the mass-market illustrated press of Victorian Britain. Caricature lay at the intersection of politics, art, and the commercial print trade, with satirical images functioning as both entertainment and political commentary. From attacks on monarchs and ministers to reflections on class, gender, and war, caricatures became a powerful and popular means of informing public debate. Illuminating the artists, technologies, and markets that propelled this artform’s spread, Helen Pierce provides new insights into how caricature mediated authority, dissent, and identity over two and a half transformative centuries.
Conference | International Classicisms around 1800
From ArtHist.net:
Revolution and Canon: International Classicisms around 1800
Institute of Art and Architectural History, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 19–21 November 2026
In einer Zeit fundamentaler sozialer und politischer Umbrüche, als die emanzipatorischen Bestrebungen der Revolutionen in den Vereinigten Staaten Amerikas und Frankreich internationale Auswirkungen herbeiführten, erlebte die Architektur um 1800 eine Rückbesinnung auf den Kanon der klassischen Formensprache. Diese scheinbare Gegenläufigkeit von bürgerlicher Zeitenwende und kultureller Kontinuität wirft bis heute Fragen historischer und historiographischer Art auf.
Anlass der Tagung ist der 200. Todestag des Karlsruher Baudirektors Friedrich Weinbrenner (1766–1826). Sein Werk und sein Leben zeugen von der inhaltlichen Vielschichtigkeit des klassizistischen Kanons, wie es sowohl im lokalen Umfeld als auch im nationalen und internationalen Vergleich klassizistischer Architekturen jener Jahre bestätigt wird. Weinbrenner war verantwortlich für die architektonische und städtebauliche Umgestaltung der Residenzstadt. Dabei nahm er eine ambivalente Haltung in der Zeitenwende der bürgerlichen Umbrüche ein: Zum einen blieb er leitender Architekt des Hof- und Stadtbauwesens eines Patrimonialstaates (ab 1806 als Großherzogtum Baden), zum anderen sollte die von ihm privat geführte (staatlich geförderte) Bauschule 1825 gemeinsam mit der Ingenieurschule von Johann Gottfried Tulla die erste Polytechnische Schule nach französischem Vorbild im deutschsprachigen Raum bilden. Auch einige der späten Werke Weinbrenners, darunter das Durlacher Brunnenhaus, zeugen vom polytechnischen Geist technischer Innovation, ökonomischer Effizienz und bürgerlicher Emanzipation. Seine Schüler trugen zur internationalen Rezeption seines Werks und zur Verbreitung seiner Architekturlehre bei: mit ihnen gelangten sie bis in die USA, wohin einige seiner ehemaligen Studenten auswanderten. An der räumlichen Ausdehnung solcher Episoden wird greifbar, wie sehr der Klassizismus um 1800 bereits an internationale Netzwerke angeschlossen war, in denen ein Kanon klassischer Formen und Bildungsideale im internationalen Diskurs reflektiert und neu konstituiert wurde.
Durch die Verbindung beider Betrachtungsansätze auf möglichst breiter internationaler Basis beabsichtigt die Tagung, zu neuen Perspektiven und tieferen Einsichten in die mehrschichtigen Bedeutungsstrukturen des Klassischen in der Architektur um 1800 zu gelangen. Dabei sollen anhand konkreter Werke und Akteure die Architektur und der Städtebau—als akademische Disziplinen aber auch als produktive Tätigkeiten—in Form und Inhalt hinsichtlich ihrer künstlerischen, technischen und sozialen Aspekte befragt werden. Ziel ist es, durch einen dialogischen Austausch zu einer vergleichenden Betrachtung zu gelangen und so eine erweiterte, international vernetzte Vorstellung des Klassischen mit seinen vielfältigen Implikationen um 1800 zu erreichen. Hierfür stecken die fünf thematischen Sektionen der Tagung den Rahmen und die Leitlinien für den Dialog ab.
The event is open to the public, and no registration is required.
Contact: bag@ikb.kit.edu
t h u r s d a y , 1 9 n o v e m b e r
9.00 Welcome and Introduction
• Joaquín Medina Warmburg, Federico Garrido, Marco Silvestri (KIT): Revolutions in the Canon: The Architecture of Classicism as Symbolic Practice
9.30 Opening Lecture
• Klaus Jan Philipp (Universität Stuttgart) — Klassizismus, Kanon, Kritik
10.30 Coffee break
11.00 Panel 1 | The Scientization and Technicization of Classicism
• Marcus Popplow (KIT) — Zur Wissensgeschichte des Ingenieurberufes um 1800 in Europa
• Salvatore Pisani (Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz) — Neue hybride Welt. Klassischer Kanon und Technikwende nach 1800 am Beispiel des Pariser Straßenmobiliars
• Christiane Salge (TU Darmstadt) — Vom Unterricht zum Lehrbuch: Verwissenschaftlichung der Architekturlehre um 1800
13.00 Lunch break
14.30 Panel 2 | Teaching and Design Methods of Classicism
• Claudia Shmidt (UTDT, Buenos Aires) — The Problem of Architectural Character in Polytechnic Teaching between Europe and South America around 1800
• Steven Lauritano (Leiden University/Harvard University) — Klassizismus in a Bottle? On Friedrich Weinbrenner’s ‘Drinking Vessels’ ca. 1819
• Adrián Fernández Almoguera (UNED, Madrid) — Silvestre Pérez and the Radical Classicism at Accademia della Pace in Rome
• David Mesa Cedillo (UPC/KIT) — Auf der Suche nach dem Ideal: Schinkels Lehrbuch und seine hermeneutische Position zwischen Klassizismus und Romantik
• Marcus van der Meulen (RWTH Aachen) — Building the Modern State: Public Architecture, Education, and State Transformation in Congress Poland, 1815–1831
17.30 Break
18:00 Panel 3 | Canon and Cultural Heritage of Classicism
• Celia Guilarte (Museo Nacional del Prado/UNED) — The Symbolic Programm and Conversion of Villanueva’s Museo del Prado
• Xiaoruo Cao (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) — On Chinese Architecture and the Classical Measure in Illustrated Archives: From Chinoiserie to World Architectural History
• Julian Hanschke (KIT) — Quellenbasierte Rekonstruktion des Markgräflichen Palais von Friedrich Weinbrenner in Karlsruhe
f r i d a y , 2 0 n o v e m b e r
9.00 Panel 4 | Territorial and Colonial Strategies of Classicism
• Maur Dessauvage (Columbia University) — Classicism in an Age of Mass Warfare
• Nikos Magouliotis (ETH Zürich) — Classicism, the Greeks, and the Iroquois: Colonialist and Nationalist Discourses on Architecture in Post-Ottoman Greece
• Cosmin Minea (New Europe College, Bucharest) — Whitewashing the Nation: The Classicisation of Monuments in the Balkans and the Erasure of the Ottoman Past in the First Half of the 19th Century
• Leo Herrmann (University of Edinburgh) — The World According to Classicism: Late 18th-Century Theory and the Invention of Non-European Architecture
11.00 Coffee break
11.30 Panel 5 | The Concept of Nature and Landscape of Classicism
• Pedro Duarte Bento (FAUL, Lisbon) — A ‘Natural History of Architecture’ — The Influence of Science on Early 19th-Century Architectural Theory
• Hannah Schiefer (Universität Siegen) — Architekturen des Ursprungs. Zur epistemischen Funktion des Archaischen bei Winckelmann und Quatremère de Quincy
• Sean Yuxiang Li (TU Braunschweig) — Classicalizing Earth: Landbaukunst, Ruralisation, and Earthen Architecture around 1800
13.30 Lunch break
15.00 Closing Lecture
• Michael J. Lewis (Williams College, Williamstown) — Junger Mensch, Sie kennen die Welt zu wenig: Friedrich Weinbrenners kontinuierliches Lernen und Lehren
s a t u r d a y , 2 1 n o v e m b e r
10.00 Excursion, Karlsruhe City Centre
New Book | The Rest Is Silence
From Yale UP:
Joanna Stalnaker, The Rest Is Silence: Enlightenment Philosophers Facing Death (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2025), 304 pages, ISBN: 978-0300181340, $35. The Lewis Walpole Series in Eighteenth-Century Culture and History.
A moving, intimate portrait of the Enlightenment philosophers as they faced the end of their lives and their historical moment.
Shortlisted for the Kenshur Prize, sponsored by The Center for Eighteenth-Century Studies at Indiana University.
What would the Enlightenment look like if we viewed it through the eyes of the philosophers as they were facing death? Joanna Stalnaker turns our usual perspective on the Enlightenment on its head, bringing to light a set of works written at the end of the Old Regime and at the end of their authors’ lives. These works, all written before the French Revolution, cast a retrospective glance over the intellectual movement their authors participated in, and over the authors’ own lives and works. Stalnaker shows that the beauty of these works stems from their authors’ efforts to give literary form to the materiality and fragility of their dying bodies. As they reflected on writing as a means of reaching posterity, Enlightenment philosophers embraced the possibility that neither their names nor their writings would survive long beyond the decomposition of their bodies. They inscribed the silence and nothingness of death into their last works.
Stalnaker’s book unsettles reigning interpretations of the Enlightenment as a precursor to our modernity and shows its protagonists at their moments of fragility and doubt, capturing their sense of an ending rather than the confidence in a glowing future so often attributed to them.
Joanna Stalnaker is professor of French at Columbia University. She is the author of a prizewinning first book, The Unfinished Enlightenment: Description in the Age of the Encyclopedia. She lives in New York City.
New Book | The British Cemetery
Distributed by Liverpool University Press:
Brent Elliott and Roger Bowdler, The British Cemetery: Architecture, Landscape, Sculpture (London: Historic England, 2026), 544 pages, ISBN: 978-1836245964, £50 / $85.
Covering 1700–2020, this book is the first major study of the British cemetery, tracing the rise of these new landscapes of remembrance from early modern times to the present. Victorian cemeteries drew on the Georgian churchyard tradition and a long-established interest in the burial customs of antiquity. New commercial opportunities were seized as church controls ended, with fast-growing urban populations demanding space for their dead. The results were magnificent: new combinations of layout, planting and myriad memorials arose, reflecting the eclectic taste and religious mood of the times. Virgin land on the edge of towns was adapted to receive mass burials, and the mason’s trade expanded rapidly to supply the growing market for family memorials. Chapters based on new research look at the evolution of buildings, planting, and tombs. Contemporary comments are extensively cited, and a picture emerges of these complex places, seething with family loss and communal memory. From grand mausoleum to humble burial plot, this survey casts light on all varieties of grave, and brings the story up to the present day.
Brent Elliott, formerly Librarian at the Royal Horticultural Society, member of the Victorian Society’s Buildings Committee, has been a committee member or trustee for Kensal Green, West Norwood, and Highgate Cemeteries.
Roger Bowdler worked at English Heritage/Historic England from 1989 to 2018 as a historian and Director of Listing. A specialist in commemorative art, he has written on church monuments, churchyards, mausolea, and war memorials.
Call for Papers | Gothic, 1730–1850
From ArtHist.net and Strawberry Hill:
Gothic: Traditions, Transmissions, Translations, 1730–1850
St Mary’s University and Strawberry Hill House, Twickenham, 17–18 June 2027
Proposals due by 4 January 2027
Hosted in collaboration with the Lewis Walpole Library, Yale University, and the Kulturstiftung Dessau-Wörlitz, this international conference explores the Gothic Revival across literature, art, architecture, and material culture, with particular attention to collecting, antiquarianism, and the international movement of objects, texts, and ideas.
Confirmed plenary speakers include Martin Bressani (McGill University), Deborah Russell (University of York), Roger White (independent architectural historian), and James Uden, Professor of Classics at Yale University.
We welcome proposals for 20-minute papers and panels from scholars at all career stages. Early-career researchers and scholars working outside the UK are particularly encouraged to apply. Please send an abstract of up to 300 words and a biographical note of up to 150 words to gothic2027@gmail.com by 4 January 2027. Panel proposals should include a panel overview and individual paper abstracts.
The full Call for Papers is available here»



















leave a comment