Enfilade

From the Parsons website:

Erika Naginksi, Contra Palladio
Parsons The New School for Design, New York, 3 February 2011

This talk broaches the question of Palladio’s critical legacy from the vantage of Robert Adam’s repudiation of the prevailing Palladianism of his time. The aim here is two-fold: first, to consider how Classical eclecticism and an interest in what Adam construed as “movement … the rise and fall, the advance and recess” of architectural form might have functioned as correctives to what in his eyes stood as the rigidity, predictability and mimicry of the Palladian system (as laid down by Lord Burlington); and second, to speculate more broadly on the tension between, on the one hand, the architect’s ambition to recodify Palladio, and on the other, to renounce the results that codification inevitably produces.

Erika Naginski is Associate Professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Design. A historian of 17th- and 18th-century art and architecture, Naginski addresses early modern aesthetic philosophy and the critical traditions of architectural history. Her publications include Sculpture and Enlightenment (Getty Research Institute, 2009), a study of commemoration in an age of secular rationalism and revolutionary politics; Polemical Objects (2004), a special issue of Res co-edited with Stephen Melville, which explores the philosophy of medium in Hegel, Heidegger and others; and Writing on Drawing (2000) for the journal Representations, with essays on the collision of semiotics and mimesis in drawing practices. She has been a fellow at the Harvard Society of Fellows, The Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, the Clark Art Institute, and the Deutsches Forum für Kunstgeschichte.  In 2007, she was awarded a John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship for a book project on the intersections of architecture, archaeology and conceptions of history in the late 17th and 18th centuries.