New Book | Carlo Marchionni: Caricaturista
From Campisano:
Simonetta Prosperi Valenti Rodino, Carlo Marchionni: Caricaturista tra Roma, Montefranco, Civitavecchia e Ancona (Rome: Campisano, 2015), 464 pages, ISBN: 978-8898229482, $90.
Carlo Marchionni (1702–1786) è assai noto per la sua attività di architetto e decoratore nel Settecento a Roma, città dove lavorò nelle imprese più significative del tempo: la Fabbrica e la Sacrestia di San Pietro, anche se la sua fama è legata alla celebre Villa Albani sulla via Salaria, da lui progettata per raccogliere la collezione di antichità del cardinal Alessandro Albani. Accanto a questa attività, Marchionni si dedicò anche alla caricatura, realizzando per suo divertimento un’ampia serie di divertenti studi caricaturali dedicati a personaggi d’ogni ambiente sociale del suo tempo: da gentiluomini ed ‘offiziali’, prelati e personaggi di Curia, artisti suoi colleghi incontrati all’Accademia di San Luca, quali l’architetto Barigioni, i pittori Benefial, Batoni e Monosilio, senza dimenticare servi, mendicanti, gobbi ed appartenenti alla più bassa categoria sociale, che ci offrono nel loro insieme uno spaccato interessantissimo della società romana del Settecento. Se le strade di Roma, fornirono il materiale umano più interessante all’occhio curioso dell’architetto, la sua vena satirica lo accompagnò anche nei suoi viaggi di lavoro a Civitavecchia ed Ancona, luoghi dove si soffermò a ritrarre figure di turchi, levantini e lavoranti portuali incontrati per caso. Una pausa serena gliela offrì la cittadina umbra di Montefranco, nei pressi di Terni, dove soggiornò con la sua famiglia in una tranquilla vacanza ospitato dall’amico Lorenzo Sinibaldi: lì ebbe modo di fissare in divertentissime vignette i personaggi più in vista del piccolo centro agricolo, dal Segretario comunale, ai villici, al barbiere, sino a fabbri, contadini e i caratteristici gobbi, da lui presi bonariamente in giro. Tre di questi tomi, ed indubbiamente i più significativi, sono confluiti nelle raccolte del Museo di Roma a Palazzo Braschi: insieme agli analoghi volumi, oggi conservati uno nella Biblioteca Palatina di Parma, l’altro nella Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, ed infine l’ultimo nel Département des Arts Graphiques del Louvre di Parigi, essi costituiscono il documento della produzione di caricature, davvero non secondaria, del più noto architetto attivo a Roma nel Settecento. Questo libro illustra tale attività, offrendo il catalogo completo delle ben 294 caricature conservate nei tre volumi del Museo di Roma.
Simonetta Prosperi Valenti Rodinò è professore ordinario di Storia dell’arte moderna all’Università di Roma Tor Vergata. Èspecialista del disegno italiano ed in particolare romano dal XVI al XVIII secolo, soggetto ai cui ha dedicato molti saggi in riviste italiane e straniere ed in cataloghi di mostre. Da anni approfondisce lo storia del collezionismo ed il mercato del disegno in Italia dei secoli XVII e XVIII. Le sue più recenti e significative pubblicazioni su questi soggetti sono i volumi Il Codice Resta di Palermo (2007), I disegni del Codice Capponiano 237 della Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana (2010), Dilettanti del disegno nell’Italia del Seicento: padre Resta tra Malvasia e Magnavacca (2013). È uno dei curatori ed autori del volume di Atti del Convegno Maratti e l’Europa (Roma, 11–12 novembre 2013), di prossima pubblicazione.
Call for Papers | ASECS 2016, Pittsburgh
2016 American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies Conference
Pittsburgh, 31 March — 3 April 2016
Proposals due by 15 September 2015
The 2016 ASECS conference takes place in Pittsburgh, March 31 – April 3, at the Omni William Penn. Along with our annual luncheon and business meeting, HECAA will be represented by the Anne Schroder New Scholars’ Session, chaired by Janet White. In addition, a selection of sessions that might be relevant for HECAA members are included below. A full list of panels is available as a PDF file here»
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Anne Schroder New Scholars’ Session (Historians of Eighteenth-Century Art and Architecture)
Janet R. White, UNLV School of Architecture, 4505 Maryland Pkwy, Box 454018, Las Vegas, NV 89154- 4018; janet.white@unlv.edu.
This session will feature outstanding new research by emerging scholars of art and architecture in the long eighteenth century.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Felines and Philosophers in the Eighteenth Century
Michael Yonan, Department of Art History and Archaeology, University of Missouri, 365 McReynolds Hall, Columbia, MO 65211; yonanm@missouri.edu.
The Comte de Buffon was not a cat person. “Unfaithful domestics,” he dubbed them, possessing “only the appearance of attachment or friendship” with their human keepers. Behind those enticing purrs and rubs lay malicious, distrustful natures, leading Buffon to question whether cats could ever be socialized completely. Even worse, unlike their wild cousins, house cats were dissimulators, “easily assuming the habits of society, but never acquiring its manners.” Buffon’s comments prophesize sentiments voiced today by those wondering how creatures with strong independent and predatory instincts ended up sleeping on our couches. They likewise reveal that something about felines remained difficult to describe within schema of animal behavior formulated in the Enlightenment. Following in the footsteps of recent ASECS panels devoted to birds, otters, and monkeys, this panel seeks papers discussing perceptions of domesticated felines in the eighteenth century. How did philosophers understand cats? How did natural historians explain their role in nature and subsequent migration into human domains? How did artists and writers formulate images and narratives that engaged with these perceptions? Papers from all disciplines are welcomed and interdisciplinary inquiries strongly encouraged.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
In the 1720s. . .
Regina Janes, Dept of English, Skidmore College, 815 N. Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866; rjanes@skidmore.edu.
Papers are invited on any aspect of the culture (sermons to opera), economics, or politics of the 1720s. The decade beginning with the South Sea Bubble, saw Gulliver’s Travels, The Beggar’s Opera, two versions of The Dunciad, Defoe’s novels, Mandeville’s enflaming additions to the Fable of the Bees, Watteau’s death, Hogarth’s early work, Handel’s operas, Swift’s Irish tracts, Voltaire’s English visit and commentary, the beginning of Haywood’s career and the end of Centlivre’s, the death of George I and the coronation of George II, not to mention the controversy over who translated Pope’s Odyssey. Much has been omitted. Submissions are invited, but not required, to consider whether the work or problem under consideration, the tea kettle or the map, the garden or the statistical analysis, the book or the silver tray, constitutes a beginning at this period, or an ending, or merely a fecund middle muddle.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Mapping the Eighteenth-Century City
Hannah Williams, St John’s College, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3JP, United Kingdom; hannah.williams@sjc.ox.ac.uk.
This session seeks to explore eighteenth-century approaches to mapping cities and current approaches to mapping eighteenth-century cities. Academically these two pursuits are often distinct, with inquires into historical maps as visual images or textual documents, and inquiries using modern mapping techniques to communicate aspects of urban life in the past. This session draws connections between these practices inviting scholars from a range of fields, including art historians, historians, historical geographers, and digital humanists, among others, to bridge the discursive gaps. Papers might consider the functions of eighteenth-century city maps—then and now; eighteenth-century cartographic aesthetics and technologies; the kinds of information eighteenth-century map- makers were trying to record or reveal; and the role these material objects can play in our own attempts, as historians, to explore eighteenth-century cities, to visualise historical data in flexible and discoverable ways, and to probe the social lives and urban experiences of eighteenth-century city inhabitants. In particular, proposals relating to recent or on-going research projects engaging with digital mapping techniques and methods are especially welcomed.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Oriental Networks: Culture, Commerce and Communication, 1662–1842
Greg Clingham, Bucknell University Press, Bucknell University, Taylor Hall 6, Lewisburg, PA 17837; clingham@bucknell.edu.
Recent recognition of the global scope of the enlightenment has emphasized international networks informing travel, scientific exploration, trade, and politics, not to mention the fascination with exotic geographies and peoples that surfaces in poetry, fiction, drama, landscape design, art, material culture, and aesthetics. This panel seeks papers that explore any aspects of the cultural and commercial transactions and networks linking the Orient – understood as China, Japan, South East Asia, the Near East (and perhaps even the Cape Colony, as a pivotal geographical link between East and West)—with Europe and America from the time of the Kangxi emperor (1662–1722) to the first Opium War (1839–42). Contributors might explore either oriental or occidental perspectives. All critical and theoretical approaches are welcome, as are papers (of no longer than 20 minutes in length) in any discipline or combination of disciplines. If circumstances are right, abstracts (or full papers) will be circulated to interested parties before the conference, and contributors will be invited to submit their papers for publication in a volume of essays by Bucknell UP. Send 1–2 page abstract plus 1-page cv to Greg Clingham (clingham@bucknell.edu).
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Inside the Artist’s Studio
Heather McPherson, Department of Art and Art History, AEIVA 211, 1221 10th Avenue South, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; mcphers@uab.edu.
This session will examine the artist’s studio as a multi-faceted site of artistic experimentation, creation, and display; social interchange and artistic camaraderie; and financial exchange with collectors and dealers that frequently blurred the lines between public and private and art and commerce. I am interested in papers exploring the artist’s studio in the long eighteenth century from diverse national and global perspectives ranging from painting techniques and chemical experiments; to apprenticeship and the role of assistants in producing art and replicas; to the studio’s role as an exhibition venue; to its growing significance as an artistic and literary theme that was closely tied to artistic identity and professional status, sometimes functioning as a figurative self-portrait of the artist. The expanding coverage of the arts in the press and the advent of public exhibitions contributed to the public’s growing interest in the visual arts and the image and personality of the artist.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
The Competitive Edge: Ambitious Relations Among Women
Julia Douthwaite, Dept. of Romance Languages and Literatures, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556; jdouthwa@nd.edu.
At the 2015 ASECS in Los Angeles, several panels were devoted to women’s tributes to women. Such panels showed how women writers either before or during the eighteenth century provided inspiring models or much-needed mentorship for other women writers. This 2016 seminar proposes to look at potentially more problematic relations among women. Under what conditions and why did eighteenth-century women compete with other women, whether precursors or contemporaries? How might we assess such competition? Presumably driven by ambition, whether conscious or not, was competition between or among women necessarily destructive, dividing women from each other, or could competition be productive, and if so how? In what genres—novels, painting, journals, philosophical or scientific texts, for instance—did women represent competition with other women, and does the genre affect what might be at stake for women competing with women? This seminar invites contributions from a variety of disciplines and cultural traditions to examine different forms of competition among women and interpret the reasons for that competition and the effects of it.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Empires of Print
Douglas Fordham, McIntire Department of Art, University of Virginia, Fayerweather Hall, P.O. Box 400130, Charlottesville, VA 22904; fordham@virginia.edu.
A quarter century after Mary Louise Pratt published Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation, this session reconsiders travel narratives in the long eighteenth century, and it places a particular emphasis on books and reproductive prints as physical objects with their own imperial histories and narratives. With books, prints, and printed ephemera more accessible to scholars than ever before, this session reconsiders ‘imperial print culture’ not just from the perspective of subject matter and thematics, but also as commodities and agents within the flows and networks of Western imperialism. Paper submissions are encouraged from a variety of disciplines and the travel narratives and images may pertain to any region or nation in the long eighteenth century.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Rubens in the Eighteenth Century
Kaylin Haverstock Weber and Leslie M. Scattone, (Weber) 4120 Oberlin Street, Houston, Texas 77005; (Scattone) 6236 Overbrook Lane, Houston, Texas 77057; kaylinhweber@yahoo.com and leslie.scattone@gmail.com.
Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640) cast a long shadow on art and culture not just in the seventeenth century, but throughout the eighteenth century to the present day. Through hundreds of paintings as well as thousands of reproductive prints, the work of Rubens had a major impact on artists, patrons, collectors and writers. In the eighteenth century, the dynamic art market brought even greater access to his work both in Europe and her colonies. While many artists looked to Rubens for artistic inspiration, some also saw him as a model of an artist who attained the status of a gentleman, collector, diplomat, and court painter. His legacy, which has been the subject of a recent major exhibition, is a vast topic that deserves greater investigation. Through this seminar we hope to expand the scope of the current discourse to include not only European art, but also colonial art, as well as Rubens’s influence in terms of art criticism, literature, and fashion.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Satirical Images: Between Sociability, Animosity, and Entertainment
Kathryn Desplanque and Jessica Fripp, (Desplanque) AAHVS, Duke University, PO Box 90766, Duham, NC 27708; (Fripp) TCU School of Art, PO Box 298000, Ft Worth, TX, 76129; kathryn.desplanque@duke.edu and j.fripp@tcu.edu.
The use of graphic satire proliferated in the eighteenth century, from the caricature and portrait charges of the Grand Tour (Pier Leoni Ghezzi, Thomas Patch, François-André Vincent), to political caricature on the continent and in England, to the verbal-visual puns of broadside imagery and street cries series, to the complex allegories that criticized and supported the French Revolution. These different genres of graphic satire are difficult to reconcile because they vary widely in tone: some are oppositional, others are sociable, and others still seemed destined primarily for entertainment. Scholarship on eighteenth-century graphic satire has privileged oppositional and political imagery, neglecting the prolific sociable, amusing, and cultural caricatures whose imagery and tone are often more challenging to decode. Recent scholarship, such as The Efflorescence of Caricature (2010), The Saint-Aubin ‘Livre de caricatures’ (2012), L’Art de la caricature (2014), and Ann Bermingham’s 2015 Clifford Lecture, “Coffee-House Characters and British Visual Humor at the End of the Eighteenth Century,” has begun to bridge persistent gaps in the study of graphic satire, putting into conversation formerly disparate genres of satirical imagery. This panel seeks papers that nuance, overturn, or refine the categories applied to graphic satire—oppositional versus entertaining; political versus cultural; sociable versus slanderous. Possible topics might include, but are not limited to: satire (especially political satire) in the light of sociability; how the circulation of these images through commercial or social exchange relates to their format, including tone or medium; and how satire informs our understanding of relationships between individuals and groups, such as friendship, enmity, rivalry, or comradery.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Home Entertainment: Artistic Production and Domestic Life
Linda Zionkowski and Miriam Hart, Department of English, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701; zionkows@ohio.edu and hartmim@aol.com.
Writing in the mid-nineteenth century, Anna Lefroy recalled the home of her aunt, Jane Austen, as a haven for “the flow of native homebred wit,” where “all the fun & nonsense of a clever family” found expression in the art they produced. This session will examine the prevalence of homebred amusements in the long eighteenth century, particularly those involving music, drama, and literature. Journals, diaries, and literary texts from this period repeatedly describe the importance of home as a place for artistic creation, experimentation, and enjoyment, particularly for women like Austen but also for men like Alexander Pope; they also portray home entertainment as the occasion for dissipation and transgressive conduct—behavior that is all the more disruptive when it occurs in the midst of family life. Panelists might consider the way in which playing, singing, acting, or writing at home challenges concepts of gender roles and domesticity; enables individuals to fashion an identity as actors, writers, and musicians; and confuses the categorization of private and public venues for artistic production.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Picturing the News
Leslie Ritchie, Department of English Language and Literature, John Watson Hall 4th Floor, 49 Bader Lane, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L3N6; ritchiel@queensu.ca.
Unlike their image-laden modern counterparts, eighteenth-century newspapers present their readers with a wall of words. Within their tight columns of text, however, eighteenth-century newspapers allude to, advertise, or represent the pictorial in myriad ways. This panel will consider the role played by the pictorial in news media. Topics may include: advertisements for particular artists or prints; allusions to visual arts topoi or particular art works within the news; reviews that rely upon the visual; broadsides, pamphlets and prints that comment on news items using visual means; the typography and formatting of news.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Worrying about Money in France: The Art and Literature of Financial Crisis Kate Jensen, Dept. of French, Studies 416 Hodges Hall, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-5309; kjensen@lsu.edu.
The 2015 ASECS Annual Meeting included at least six ‘economic’ panels that covered topics including the triangular trade, double-entry bookkeeping, and works of political economy by Smith and Montesquieu. Some scholars connected political economy to novels by authors such as Burney and Austen, or sought to understand the norms dictating the literary market and how it was gendered. A round-table focused on the surprise best-seller of 2014, Piketty’s Capitalism in the 21st Century. But the question of method remains somewhat elusive. Can media such as art and literature predict, prejudice or otherwise affect the course of financial history? Or do they play a more passive role, as a mirror of mentalities? Whereas Piketty studies the realism of Balzac to enable readers to identify the wealth needed to frequent the elite of the 1820s, and to understand the fears of bankruptcy felt by the have-nots, this panel would like to explore other methods of analyzing literature’s role in moments of economic turbulence. Before declaring on fiction’s use-value to realistically portray money worries, we need to explore where those worries came from, who generated them, and what forms they later took. This session seeks to prompt scholars to make interdisciplinary connections between art, literature and economic history, to see if and to what extent these media may be seen as active participants in fanning the flames of financial worry in eighteenth-century France, especially in reaction to the financial crisis of 1719–21 (the Law System) and the build- up to the French Revolution.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Realism and ‘Real Life’: New Approaches to Material Culture and Literature
Karen Lipsedge and Julie Park, (Lipsedge) English Literature Department, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, England; (Park) English Department, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0744; K. Lipsedge@Kingston.ac.uk and jupark@vassar.edu.
One of the major innovations attributed to the eighteenth-century novel was its development of realism as a literary mode and representational system. So realistic was the narrative art of fiction during this period, the worlds depicted in it were recognizable as the readers’ own. Scholars from Ian Watt and Naomi Schor to Cynthia Wall have explored the critical role physical details play in producing narrative realism. What might happen if we were to focus not only on eighteenth-century material culture as it appears in literature as description or plot device, but on the referents themselves? How might research—including embodied research in physical environments—in the material worlds of eighteenth-century life complicate our understandings of realism’s realism? How might information about the way carriages, pockets, toothpick cases, personal letters, bowling greens, scissors, etc., were designed and used in their eighteenth-century contexts transform our understanding of their significance when they emerge in literature as setting, prop or detail? We invite papers exploring eighteenth-century literature of all genres and material culture research of all fields, from theater design, costume history, landscape and garden design to print and manuscript studies.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Tableaux Vivants: Life and/as Art in the Eighteenth Century
Noémie Etienne, Getty Research Institute; and Meredith Martin, New York University, Department of Art History, New York University, 303 Silver Center, 100 Washington Square E, New York, NY, 10003; msm240@nyu.edu.
During the eighteenth century, a whole series of artistic productions aimed to simulate motion and life, at the same time that individuals became ever more preoccupied with performing or embodying static works of art. This session aims to explore such hybrid creations and the boundaries they challenged between animate and inanimate form, art and technology, the living and the dead. Papers may focus on specific objects, such as the automata created by the clockmaker Pierre-Jacques Droz that imitated human acts of writing or harpsichord playing; hyperrealistic wax figures, sometimes displayed in groups or dioramas, that were used for entertainment as well as pedagogical and medical purposes; and ‘tableaux mécaniques’, mixed-media paintings with motors on the back that enabled the figures represented to move across their surfaces. Other possible topics include the staging of collaborative tableaux vivants in eighteenth-century theaters, gardens, and salons; and related attempts to resurrect or animate ancient artifacts, as in Emma Hamilton’s ‘living statue’ performances. Papers that consider the eighteenth-century specificity of such artistic productions, introduce new methodological perspectives, or discuss relevant examples from outside of Europe are especially encouraged.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Eighteenth-Century Freemasonry and the Arts
Rebecca Dowd Geoffroy-Schwinden, Music History, College of Music, Division of Music History, Theory, and Ethnomusicology, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle, Denton, TX 76203-5017; rebeccageoffroy@gmail.com.
Freemasonry represented a new social and cultural institution during the eighteenth century. The ideologies of Freemasonry opened new frontiers to the application of Enlightenment philosophy to lived experience, to the creation of new spaces of socialization, and to the integration of new forms of spirituality with Newtonianism and sensationism. The practices and ideologies of Freemasonry called for humans to rethink their relationships: with themselves and their peers, with authority figures, and toward the natural and supernatural realms. Artists across the visual, performing, and literary arts came to occupy a crucial role in the development, expansion, and sociality of Masonic lodges. This panel seeks to explore the significance of the relationship that Freemasonry, from its rituals to its social structure to its values, shared with the arts. Recent scholarship has begun to reveal the rapport between Freemasonry and the visual, performing, and literary arts. This panel aims to bring scholars of the arts into conversation to pursue a holistic theoretical and methodological framework through which to understand the mutual influence of Freemasonry and the arts during the eighteenth century.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
‘The Delight of the Eye’: Eighteenth-Century Painting and/as Decoration
Yuriko Jackall, National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. and Katherine Brion, Kalamazoo College, Jackall: Department of French Paintings, National Gallery of Art, 2000B South Club Drive, Landover, MD 20785; Y-jackall@nga.gov and kbrion@kzoo.edu.
In 1747, the critic Étienne La Font de Saint-Yenne lamented that painting of the French school had been divested of its rightful purpose: bringing great deeds of the past to splendid visual life. For his contemporaries, La Font argued, painting had become nothing more than another form of vanity or ornamentation, a “delight of the eye” equated with surface treatments such as mirrors, gilding, paneling, and plasterwork. In the context of this lament, he drew a sharp distinction between history painting (broadly defined as narrative representation with moral and didactic intent) and painting as decoration (associated with pleasure and flattery). Apart from some temporary upsets, this distinction held sway over painting and its reception through the nineteenth century and into the twentieth.
The goal of this session is to explore the relationship between painting and decoration in the practice and reception of eighteenth-century art—a relationship that begs to be reexamined, particularly in the light of increasing scholarly interest in later ‘decorative’ impulses. In what contexts was the category of decoration meaningful, and how was it defined? To what extent were site-specificity, the constitution of ensembles, the formal qualities of paintings themselves, and/or other concerns determining factors in the role of painting as decoration? Was ‘decorative’ painting aligned with, or distinguished from, other ‘decorative’ practices and media? Finally, do the answers to these questions dispute, nuance or confirm La Font’s opposition of decoration and edifying representation? Case studies in a variety of fields ranging from architecture to the decorative arts are welcome, as are papers examining the subsequent historical impact of eighteenth-century models of painting and/as decoration.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Istanbul: Beyond Tulips and Turqueries
Jonathan Haddad; jhaddad@berkeley.edu.
How should we situate Istanbul in Eighteenth Century Studies? Traditionally, scholarship has pivoted on the Tulip period (1703–30) as a moment of unprecedented adoption by the Ottoman state and society of European influences in the arts and technology, extending to advances in military tactics and the advent of print. However, recent revisions of studies in Orientalism have brought to bear evidence of more complex cultural flows that blur the frontiers between Europe and the Ottoman Empire. In a similar vein, situating Istanbul within the field of Mediterranean Studies has been fruitful in revealing the work done in facilitating these cultural flows by transcultural intermediaries, such as dragomans, renegades, and Armenian merchants. However, narratives of mobility reconstitute a European relationship with the Islamicate Orient at the risk of deemphasizing the internal dynamics of the Ottoman state and society as factors of artistic production.
This panel, then, seeks to reconcile these disparate approaches to the Ottoman Empire in the eighteenth century through contributions that explore how Ottoman and other identities (Persianate, European, Islamic, provincial, urban, transcultural, etc.) were articulated through poetry, performance, court ceremonials, the visual arts, ekphrasis, and/or artistic patronage in eighteenth-century Istanbul. Please send abstracts of 200–350 words.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Violence and Death in Eighteenth-Century Visual Culture
Amy Freund, Department of Art History, Southern Methodist University, P.O. Box 750356 Dallas, Texas 75275- 0356; afreund@smu.edu.
Chardin’s eviscerated ray, William Blake’s tortured slaves, Copley’s Watson eternally escaping his shark, Goya’s terrifying Disasters of War, David’s deaths of everyone from Hector to Marat: violence and death haunt eighteenth-century visual culture. This panel will explore the depiction of violence and death in eighteenth-century art, with the aim of mapping an alternative history of the visual arts and revising our understanding of aesthetic categories such as the Rococo and Neoclassicism. Topics might include: representations of sick, injured, aging or dying bodies, both human and animal; violent practices (hunting, executions, warfare); the impact of eighteenth- century colonial violence and global war on artistic production; memorialization of the dead (including saints and ancient or contemporary heroes); examinations of objects of violence (arms, armor, the guillotine), domestic or sexual violence; and violence against inanimate things (iconoclasm, the demolition of buildings, attacks on the state or religion).
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Portraiture Before 1750
Jennifer Germann, Department of Art History, Ithaca College, 953 Danby Road, Ithaca, NY 14850; jgermann@ithaca.edu.
Over the last decades, the topic of portraiture has generated significant scholarly interest. Much of this attention has been focused on painted portraits in the second half of the eighteenth century. This panel proposes to turn attention to the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century. What are the major trends or themes emerging in the practice of portraiture at this time? What about sculpted portraits or those incorporated into the decorative arts (such as in tapestries)? How are artists working internationally, within and beyond Europe? What cross-cultural exchanges are emerging with the expansion of colonial networks? Papers are welcomed from diverse cultural traditions around the globe engaging both the analysis of cross-cultural exchange in terms of the approaches to and forms of portraiture as well as facilitating the cross-cultural comparison of portrait traditions.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Illustration, Visual Interpretation, and the Eighteenth-Century Book Market
Kwinten Van De Walle, Department of Literary Studies (English Studies), Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; kwinten.vandewalle@ugent.be.
In the last two decades, scholars such as Peter Wagner and W.B. Gerard have abandoned the notion that illustrations are secondary to the typographic text proper in favour of a more balanced, and often interdisciplinary, approach which considers book illustration as an important and integral facet of print culture and the book market. Illustrations not only allowed publishers to generate appeal and to distinguish their products from their competitors’, it also had an impact on a reader’s approach to and interpretation of the text. A major intervention in the field is Sandro Jung’s recent book, James Thomson’s The Seasons, Print Culture, and Visual Interpretation, 1730–1842, which is a compelling study of the ways in which book illustration can significantly affect the cultural reception and reputation of texts. This panel wishes to acknowledge the value of book illustration studies and its potential to contribute to and even revise existing scholarly accounts of eighteenth-century literature. Open to presentations on a broad range of illustrations, from up-market productions (such as furniture prints) intended for an elite audience to cheaply manufactured ornaments in widely disseminated print forms (such as ballad-sheets and chapbooks), this panel invites 300-word paper proposals, aiming to consider the visual (re)interpretation of texts as well as the role of illustrations within the broader context of the eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century book market in general.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Fashion, Beauty, and Social Mores in Eighteenth-Century Europe
Catherine Sama, University of Rhode Island, Department of Modern and Classical Literatures, 60 Upper College Rd., Kingston, RI 02881; csama@uri.edu.
This panel invites papers from a variety of disciplines addressing the intersections among fashion, beauty, and social mores in eighteenth-century Europe. Papers might address (but are not limited to) the following topics:
• Fashion periodicals as proscriptive and/or descriptive texts of gendered norms
• Fashion, beauty, and the construction of literary, domestic, social, and national spaces
• Translations and adaptations of fashion periodicals across Europe
• Women, genre (textual, visual) and space/place in fashion periodicals and trends
• Notions of performance, gender, class in fashion periodicals and trends
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Artists’ Artists in the Long Eighteenth Century
Ryan Whyte, Faculty of Liberal Arts & Sciences, OCAD University, 100 McCaul Street, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5T 1W1; rwhyte@faculty.ocadu.ca.
In the long eighteenth century, artists commissioned, collected, and published criticism of the work of fellow living artists. Superficially, artists’ patronage and criticism of other artists appears consistent with the activities of the larger world of art, yet in fact it represents a parallel world of artistic engagement that was, and remains, at least partially inaccessible and incompletely understood beyond professional artistic circles. This session aims to shed light on artists’ taste for one another’s work in a period when the emergence of art criticism and periodic public exhibitions of contemporary art created tensions between the increasingly public nature of artists’ careers, and the exclusive, technical nature of studio practice and language.
What did it mean when an artist—rather than a critic or a patron—favored the work of a fellow living artist? Who were considered ‘artists’ artists’, as reflected, for example, in artists’ collections of one another’s work, and why? To what extent was the notion of an ‘artist’s artist’ even understood beyond the confines of the studio? When artists commissioned, collected, and published criticism of the work of fellow living artists, how and why did their patronage and criticism depart from state and private initiatives? How did homages and rivalries manifest in artists’ portraits of fellow living artists, so prevalent and sophisticated in this period? This session welcomes new approaches to these problems, including interdisciplinary and methodologically innovative papers.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Re-Framing the Picturesque
William C Snyder, Department of English, Saint Vincent College Latrobe PA 15650; william.snyder@email.stvincent.edu.
My intent is to pick the brain of ASECS members to uncover the latest scholarship addressing the Picturesque, the late eighteenth century movement that involved landscape, prospects, natural process and the relation of these to multiple arts, especially painting, poetry, and gardening. Digital Humanities and other recovery tools have provided new texts and evidence of material culture that suggest that the Picturesque in its time was (1) not bounded on one end by the touring of the 1770s and on the other by Romanticism in the 1790s; (2) subject to competing aesthetic criteria as articulated by various theorists and practitioners; (3) part of, and not simply precedent to, theory and creative work of several Romantic writers and painters well into the 1800s. I have drafted this CFP: The ‘mode’ or ‘school’ of the Picturesque is generally fixed in the last quarter of the eighteenth century, but recent research questions the period boundaries of the Picturesque as well as its theoretical underpinnings. Papers are invited to re-assess the phenomenon of the Picturesque, focusing on the connections between its visual art and verbal art, its theory, its tools and practices, its implications involving class and gender, or its influence on some Romantic writers and painters. Send 300-word proposals.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Framing the Eighteenth Century: Borders and Peripheries in Visual Culture
Daniella Berman and Blythe C. Sobol, Institute of Fine Arts, 1 East 78th Street, New York, NY 10128, daniella.berman@nyu.edu and bcs265@nyu.edu.
In its entry on bordure, the 1792 Dictionnaire des arts de peinture, scupture, et gravure considers the dynamic between painting and frame, between border and center: “Cependant, d’après les loix d’un gout éloigné de trop de sévérité, la bordure d’un tableau, ainsi que la parure d’une femme, ne doit point fixer les yeux, en les détournant trop de l’objet qu’elle embellit; mais l’une & l’autre doivent faire valoir les beautés dont elles sont l’ornement.”
Watelet and Levesque underscore the distinct remit of the central work of art and its border, in terms of iconographic program and decorative function. How do framing devices augment our understanding of the artworks they surround? How do borders and margins function in visual culture? How intentional is the association between picture plane and the embellishments on the fringe? How vital is the periphery to the center—artistically, and spatially? This panel will explore the complex and sometimes fraught relationship between the artwork and its frame, between the ornament and the ornamented, between the periphery and the center in visual culture of the long eighteenth century. We welcome a variety of interpretations of the subject of borders and peripheries in the visual arts. Topics might include, but are not limited to, the role of borders in landscape architecture or manuscript illumination; relationships between (literal) framing, display, and status; re-woven tapestry borders; considerations of luxury and superfluity in artistic discourses; and examinations of the role of Paris versus the provinces in artistic production.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Representing the Fragment in the Eighteenth Century
Olaf Recktenwald, McGill University, School of Architecture, 815 Sherbrooke St. W., Montréal, QC H3A 0C2, Canada; olaf.recktenwald@mail.mcgill.ca.
Whether it be in discussions of architecture, art, music, philosophy, literature, or theatre, the fragment rose to a new level of significance in the eighteenth century. An obsession with torsos, ruins, fragments themselves, and unfinished conditions could be linked to an understanding of nature that found its fulfilment in future growth. In the case of the built artificial ruin, the confidence that architecture could provide humans with true places of dwelling was lost, thus necessitating a desire to return to nature’s garden. Pittsburgh collections such as the Carnegie Museum of Art’s Hall of Sculpture and Hall of Architecture attest to this cultural preoccupation. This panel readily welcomes interdisciplinary readings of the fragment and ones that address either international or local topics.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Rethinking the Academic Conference (Women’s Caucus Professional Panel)
Emily C. Friedman, Auburn University, 9030 Haley Center, Auburn, AL 36849, ecfriedman@auburn.edu.
Even as travel budgets shrink (when they exist at all), conferences still play an important part in the life of the profession, and maximizing one’s time at a conference seems all the more vital. It is possible to spend 21+ hours (almost 8 hours a day) seated in a chair listening to papers. In response, “innovative formats” such as roundtables, lunches, pre-conference events, and other session forms (in addition to ‘playing hooky’ altogether) have begun to proliferate as alternatives to the traditional 15-minute-paper format.
In light of this, this session asks: what kinds of knowledge-production and collaboration do our current formats support? How can we (and should we) alter formatting, programming, and scheduling to better foster our organizational, individual, and scholarly goals? Can we steal good ideas from sister organizations or learn from their mistakes?
The 2016 Women’s Caucus Professional Session will thus take the form of Pecha-Kucha style presentations (http://www.pechakucha.org) with an extended workshop period. We seek presenters who can bring examples of productive alternative format sessions from other academic organizations, their own institutions, or dream formats that have not yet been attempted, to inspire a lively and productive discussion among all session attendees. The session will end with a working document of potential session formats, with the advantages and challenges of each form as they apply to ASECS.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Intersections of Digital and Public Humanities: New Media and New Audiences for Eighteenth-Century Studies (Roundtable)
Jessica Richard, Wake Forest University, 1834 Wake Forest Road Winston-Salem, NC 27109; richarja@wfu.edu.
This roundtable will explore the challenges and benefits of studying the eighteenth century in public, using the digital environment and reaching new audiences. Participants with public-oriented digital humanities projects (small- or large-scale, nascent or established) will address some of the following questions: What does it mean to take our scholarly work online? What is gained and/or lost when addressing a public or blended public/student/scholarly audience? How do you elicit scholarly contributors? How do you engage readers in the online environment? What opportunities does the digital environment offer? Roundtable participants might be bloggers, editors, designers, contributors, or users of online journals or other digital projects, or scholars of the digital humanities.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Note (added 14 August 2015) — The original posting failed to included the roundtable session on Intersections of Digital and Public Humanities.
New Book | The Writings of James Barry
From Ashgate:
Liam Lenihan, The Writings of James Barry and the Genre of History Painting, 1775–1809 (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014), 218 pages, ISBN: 978-1409467526, $110.
Examining the literary career of the eighteenth-century Irish painter James Barry through an interdisciplinary methodology, The Writings of James Barry and the Genre of History Painting, 1775–1809 is the first full-length study of the artist’s writings. Liam Lenihan critically assesses the artist’s own aesthetic philosophy about painting and printmaking, and reveals the extent to which Barry wrestles with the significant stylistic transformations of the pre-eminent artistic genre of his age: history painting. Lenihan’s book delves into the connections between Barry’s writings and art, and the cultural and political issues that dominated the public sphere in London during the American and French Revolutions.
Barry’s writings are read within the context of the political and aesthetic thought of his distinguished friends and contemporaries, such as Edmund Burke, his first patron; Joshua Reynolds, his sometime friend and rival; Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin, with whom he was later friends; and his students and adversaries, William Blake and Henry Fuseli. Ultimately, Lenihan’s interdisciplinary reading shows the extent to which Barry’s faith in the classical tradition in general, and the genre of history painting in particular, is permeated by the hermeneutics of suspicion. This study explores and contextualizes Barry’s attempt to rethink and remake the preeminent art form of his era.
Liam Lenihan was National University of Ireland Centennial Postdoctoral Fellow in Irish Studies from 2009 to 2011. He teaches English literature and History of Art at University College Cork.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
C O N T E N T S
Introduction: James Barry’s Writings and the Genre of History Painting
1 Barry’s Inquiry into public taste
2 The Progress of Human Culture as a Narrative of Enlightenment
3 Barry’s Lectures on Painting and the Royal Academy of Arts
4 Wollstonecraft’s Reading of Milton and the Sublime of Barry, Fuseli and Blake
5 Barry’s Self-Portrait as Timanthes and His Tenure as Professor of Painting
Conclusion: History Painting as a ‘Union of Talents’
Works Cited
Index
Display | Jonathan Richardson by Himself
Now on view at The Courtauld:
Jonathan Richardson by Himself
The Courtauld Gallery, London, 24 June — 20 September 2015
Curated by Susan Owens

Jonathan Richardson, Self-Portrait, ca. 1738 (London: The Courtauld Gallery)
Jonathan Richardson the Elder (1667–1745) was one of the most influential figures in the visual arts of 18th-century England. A leading portrait painter, Richardson was also a theorist and an accomplished poet and amassed one of the great collections of drawings of the age.
Towards the end of his life Richardson created a remarkable but little known series of self-portrait drawings. They show Richardson adopting a wide range of poses, guises and dress, in some cases deliberately evoking other artists, such as Rembrandt, whose work he owned. These remarkable drawings show Richardson considering and making visual the different aspects of himself. But much more than this, they were the means with which he reviewed his life and achievements.
Emma Crichton-Miller provides a review of the exhibition for Apollo Magazine’s Muse Room (27 July 2015). . .
Richardson’s habit of self-portraiture, charting his declining physical appearance, was married over a decade to a discipline of almost daily poems, where he examined his state of mind. Indeed as interesting as the images themselves is the intellectual and philosophical hinterland they suggest, which drove this self-made man, an admirer of Milton, who apparently turned down royal patronage, to pursue this humanist practice. . .
The full review is available here»
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
From Paul Holberton:
Susan Owens, Jonathan Richardson By Himself (London: Paul Holberton, 2015), 64 pages, ISBN: 978-1907372841, £13.
Jonathan Richardson (1667–1745) was one of 18th-century England’s most significant cultural figures. A leading portrait painter and influential art theorist, he also amassed one of the period’s greatest collections of drawings. But there was another, highly unusual dimension to his pursuits. In 1728, at the age of 61 and shortly before his retirement from professional life, Richardson began to create a remarkable series of self-portrait drawings. Not intended for public display, these works were unguarded explorations of his own character.
In one of the most astonishing projects of self-examination ever undertaken by an artist, for over a decade Richardson repeatedly drew his own face. His self-portrait drawings are usually dated precisely, and they document, from month to month, his changing state of mind as much as his appearance. Many were drawn in chalks on large sheets of blue paper, from his reflection in the mirror. Some of these are bold and psychologically penetrating, while others, in which he regards his ageing features with gentle but unflinching scrutiny, are deeply touching. A further group of self-portraits is drawn with graphite on small sheets of fine vellum, and in these Richardson often presents himself in inventive and humorous ways, such as in profile, all’antica, as though on the face of a coin or medal; or crowned with bays, like a celebrated poet. Sometimes, too, he copies his image from oil paintings made decades earlier, in order to recall his appearance as a younger man. In this extraordinary series of self-portraits, Richardson offers a candid insight into his mind and personality. Together, these drawings create nothing less than a unique and compelling visual autobiography.
This publication—which accompanies the first ever exhibition devoted to Richardson’s self-portrait drawings, held in the new Gilbert and Ildiko Butler Drawings Gallery at the Courtauld—tells the story of these remarkable works and puts them into the context of his other activities at this period of his life, in particular the self-searching poems he wrote during the same years and often on the same days as he made the drawings. An introductory essay is followed by focused discussions of each work in the exhibition. This part of the book explores the materials and techniques Richardson used, whether working in chalks on a large scale or creating exquisitely refined drawings on vellum. It will also reveal how Richardson modeled some of his portraits on old master prints and drawings, including works in his own collection by Rembrandt and Bernini. The publication brings together the Courtauld Gallery’s fine collection of Richardson’s drawings with key works in the British Museum, the National Portrait Gallery and the Fitzwilliam Museum.
New Book | The Imaginary Orient: Exotic Buildings
From Artbooks.com:
Stefan Koppelkamm, The Imaginary Orient: Exotic Buildings of the 18th and 19th Centuries in Europe (Stuttgart: Axel Menges, 2015), 192 pages, ISBN: 978-3936681772, $78.
In the eighteenth century the idea of the landscape garden, which had originated in England, spread all over Europe. The geometry of the Baroque park was abandoned in favour of a ‘natural’ design. At the same time the garden became the ‘land of illusion’: Chinese pagodas, Egyptian tombs and Turkish mosques, along with Gothic stables and Greek and Roman temples, formed a miniature world in which distance mingled with the past. The keen interest in a fairy-tale Orient was manifested also in architecture. This ‘Orient’, which could hardly be clearly defined geographically, was characterized by Islamic culture. The Islamic styles seemed especially appropriate for buildings of a secular and cheerful character. The promise of happiness associated with an Orient staged by architectural means was intended to guarantee the commercial success of coffee houses and music halls, amusement parks and steam baths. But even extravagant summer residences and middle-class villas were built in faux-Oriental styles.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Note (added 21 December 2016) — Barry Bergdoll reviews the book for The Burlington Magazine 158 (December 2016), p. 982:
Published originally in German in 1987 to accompany a series of no doubt delightful exhibitions entitled Exotische Welten-Europäische Phantasien in Stuttgart (Institut für Auslansbeziehungen), this anthology seems to be more concerned with compiling examples than analysing them . . . Sometimes groundbreaking exhibition catalogues are republished years later either because of their historical importance or because greater availability stimulates new research. The decision to translate (more or less) this rather helter-skelter overview into English more than a quarter of a century after its appearance is mystifying . . .
Call for Papers | Rowlandson and After: Rethinking Graphic Satire
Thomas Rowlandson, A York address to the whale. Caught lately off Gravesend. 5 Apr 1809. Hand-coloured etching 26 x 39 cm (Royal Collection Trust, #810766)
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Rowlandson and After: Rethinking Graphic Satire
The Paul Mellon Centre and The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace, London, 22 January 2016
Proposals due by 25 September 2015
A collaborative study-day organised by Royal Collection Trust and The Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art
The prints, drawings and watercolours of Thomas Rowlandson (1756–1827), which are to be showcased in the forthcoming exhibition High Spirits: The Comic Art of Thomas Rowlandson at The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace, have long been recognised as offering a remarkable combination of satirical invention and artistic brilliance. This study-day, which has been co-organised by Royal Collection Trust and The Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art, uses Rowlandson’s work as the starting-point for a broader art-historical examination of British graphic satire—whether drawn, engraved or painted on paper—between the later years of the 18th century and today.
Rowlandson and After is inspired by the recent upsurge in ambitious scholarship on the pictorial satires of the Georgian and Victorian periods, and by a desire to explore graphic satire’s long-standing identity as a fluid, hybrid form that seems always to straddle different worlds—art, journalism, literature and politics—rather than belonging fully to any one particular cultural sphere. Accordingly, submissions are invited that engage with examples of graphic satire dating from any point across the last 250 years and that address the following questions, among others:
• What can Rowlandson’s work tell us about the broader workings of graphic satire in his period, and how has it helped shape the practice of his successors?
• What have been the distinctive formal, iconographic, technical and textual characteristics of this particular strand of artistic practice at different historical moments, and how and why have they changed?
• What is the relationship between graphic satire and other forms of visual art?
• What kind of artistic persona is associated with this form of practice—how has the figure of the satirist been defined and imagined?
• How has the history of graphic satire been shaped by developments in print technology?
• What is the relationship between graphic satire and journalism; or graphic satire and literature; or graphic satire and political discourse?
• How might histories of graphic satire be related to histories of British humour?
• How does graphic satire operate today—and how might contemporary examples of the genre be compared to the work of artists such as Rowlandson?
The day will be split between The Paul Mellon Centre and The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace. Please send proposals (of no more than 250 words) for 20-minute papers to Ella Fleming, Events Manager, events@paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk by 5.00pm on 25 September 2015.
ISECS 2015, Rotterdam
I’ve sifted through this week’s fascinating ISECS program and pulled out many of the sessions specifically related to art in the eighteenth century. I’ve missed plenty, and the schedule as a whole looks terrific. The full schedule is available here. -CH
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
14th International Congress for Eighteenth-Century Studies (ISECS 2015)
Rotterdam, 26–31 July 2015
M O N D A Y , 2 7 J U L Y 2 0 1 5
Art Markets
S002 / 11:00–12:30, Room: M1-08: Leuven: Van Der Goot Building
Marta Oracz — The Art Market in Eighteenth-Century Britain: Teaching Arts as a Profession and Occasion to Circulate Ideas
In eighteenth-century Britain practical knowledge of how to paint became a commodity for which demand seemed to be no smaller than the one for the works of art. Artists could count on regular income as they traded their knowledge. It became an occasion to ‘sell’ both, the practical knowledge / teach manual skill/ and to spread the ideas on art. It became fashionable for the middle class women to sketch hence they employed drawing masters. One of such teachers was William Gilpin, a pre-romantic landscape painter. Apart from the amateurs, who took courses in drawing as leisurely activity, there were those who were taught art with an intention of becoming professionals: students of art took up education in the Royal Academy of Arts in London (started just in the eighteenth century, in 1768). Its first President was Sir Joshua Reynolds, famous British eighteenth-century painter. Art became in the eighteenth century a subject in high schools. One of the high-school teachers was a pre-romantic British landscape painter Alexander Cozens. Gilpin, Reynolds and Cozens as the instructors in arts at schools or private houses, described the basics for their students in theoretical texts (Gilpin – travel journals, Reynolds- Discourses, Cozens – “A New Method…”). Their texts proved to be more than just manuals with mechanical instructions, since their authors pass on to the future painters also their ideas on art: the relationship between nature, art and imagination, the conception of artist, the nature of the creative process. Hence teaching profession, taken up as a paid job, acted for the aforementioned artists a trigger for their public theoretical debates on art. art, teaching, drawing masters, idea of art, imagination, theoretical texts.
Yi-chieh Shih — Chitqua: A Chinese Modeler’s Business in London Rediscovered
Chitqua, or sometimes written in ‘Chequa’, was a Chinese portrait modeler who travelled to London and worked directly for the British cliental from 1769 to 1772. Reaching the height of his success, and having exhibited in the Royal Academy of the Arts of London in 1770, Chitqua was the first Chinese artist who was presented as an artist- sculptor like the other British artists in London, while in China, he was almost anonymous. It was during the time that the British admired the figures that inherited the French Rococo and la Chinoiserie. Small bronze replicas of famous antique sculptures made in Florence, too, were very popular for their domesticity use, as well as the portraiture from the local artists. Chitqua’s portrait figures synthesize actually all of the above and were rapidly welcomed by the market for his highly personalized skills. Commissions from a tea dealer to the Royal Infantry show that Chitqua had been able to successfully run his business outside of China. One of his existent works is the portrait figure of Dr. Anthony Askew (1722–1774), now in the collection of the Royal College of Physicians in London. Unlike the one for his peer Dr. Richard Mead (1673–1754) that he ordered from the French sculptor L.-F. Roubiliac (1702–1762), Askew had his own made by Chitqua too, who was ‘a grateful Chinese patient’ around 1771. My paper is attempting to inquire the main taste of the domestic decoration’s market in London at that time. How was Chitqua able to fit in such a foreign market that was radically different from his Chinese origin? His encounters with local connoisseurs and entrepreneurs also gave us traces to comprehend his capacities to integrate this taste to satisfy the clients, and would be examined as well.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Art Markets: Publishers’ and Collectors’ Policies
S005 / 11:00–12:30, Room: M1-19: Athene: Van Der Goot Building
Organizer / chair: Renata Schellenberg
Andrea Carlino — Trouble Printmakers: Remondini’s Giudizio Universale and the Persecution of a Roman Print-seller (1772–73)
April 21st 1772: Antonio Samonato the owner of a little shop in Rome was put in jail by the pontifical ‘birri’ and questioned by the Governor Court during the next few days. He was accused to sell a satirical print bearing the title Giudizio Universale, where the coat of arms of the Bourbons and the name of Charles III, King of Spain, appear in the lower portion of the image where the Hell with devils and damned is represented. This print, commissioned by Bonardel, a French merchant based in Cadiz, was printed by Remondini, a publishing house in Bassano, probably the biggest editorial enterprise in Europe at the time. The Spanish Ambassadors in Rome were convinced that the Giudizio Universale was part of the virulent anti-Spanish campaign led by the Jesuit (as a response to the expulsion of the order from Spain and all territories governed by the Bourbons), a campaign that—they suspected—could count on the collaboration, among others, also of the well-connected Remondini family. The affair involved the imprisonment of two other printsellers (in Turin and in Madrid), the exile of Remondini and endless diplomatic negotiations throughout Europe, until the Court of Spain acknowledged that a misinterpretation of the scene of the print occurred, due to the political turmoil generated by the expulsion of the Jesuits. This paper aims at pointing out the articulation of the microhistory of print selling with the larger frame of political and religious tensions in 1770s’ Catholic Europe. The archival material concerning Samonato and Remondini court-cases also provides the occasion to have an insights into the role played by different ‘market experts’ (print seller, big merchant, publisher and typographer) in the selection of themes and singular details to be represented in prints destined to a wide European public.
Catherin Parisian — Frances Burney’s The Wanderer and the Economics of Publishing
When Frances Burney published her fourth novel The Wanderer: Or Female Difficulties (1814), she and her publishers, Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown were optimistic for economic success. This novel, however, has gone down in literary history as an artistic and financial failure. As the story has been told, the first edition sold out before it hit the booksellers’ shops, and a second was immediately ordered. In the eighteen days between the two editions, reviewers’ and readers’ responses were negative. Critics complained that the plot was improbable, the characters stock, and the prose inflated. As a result, most of the second edition was wasted. This much one learns from Burney’s own letters. In the 1980s, critics like Maragaret Anne Doody, Janice Farrar Thadeus and others began to reassess this novel, finding in it more complex characters, more mature themes, and a more intriguing plot line. Such critics have also drawn attention to misogynist, ageist, and political biases in some of the early reviews. Yet questions Burney raises in her letters remain unanswered, questions such as how many editions the publishers actually printed, whether the publishers properly advertised the novel, and whether they paid Burney fairly in accordance with their contract. I draw on original archival research to answer these questions, bringing together evidence from relevant correspondence, printing house ledgers, and publisher’s records, to consider The Wanderer in the context of London’s 1814 publishing industry. I calculate how much Burney and her publishers profited from The Wanderer, and I consider the economics of publishing this novel in relation to other new novels published the same year. This approach to The Wanderer not only demonstrates more precisely its success as a financial endeavor, but it also supports a reconsideration of its place in literary history.
Camilla Pietrabissa — Painting for Amusement and Distraction: Landscape Pictures by Jean-Baptiste Oudry in the Marquis de Beringhen’s Cabinet
In 1744, Jean-Pierre Mariette complained about the lack of landscapists among French painters. He criticised contemporary artists for creating landscapes mostly for their ‘amusement and distraction’, following a classic trope on the genre that circulated since the Renaissance. However, Mariette also noted that landscapes by old masters and contemporary artists were sought after as decoration for the richest cabinets. These remarks reflect the double nature of the discourse on landscape representations during the period: while critics increasingly considered landscape as a fundamental talent of any artists and as an important feature of any picture’s composition, they still looked down on the genres that did not have a strong narrative or a clear morale. Under this light, Henri Camille de Beringhen (1693–1770), the son of a major collector of prints, can be considered as the prototype of the collector specialised in landscape pictures, bought or commissioned from contemporary artists such as Lancret or Boucher. Within his collection, a special position should be given to the series of seven landscapes commissioned to Jean Baptiste Oudry (1686–1755). An academician specialised in hunting pieces and the portrayal of animals, Oudry painted Beringhen’s portrait in 1722, and became the official painter of the royal hunts after the collector introduced him to Louis XV. The series of landscapes is exceptional in the painter’s production and received unprecedented public exposure: two paintings from the series were shown in the Salon of 1739, and all of them appear in the livret of 1743. Finally, Oudry himself engraved the Vue de Dieppe with a dedication to his patron. The paper asks what was the impact of such commission on the career of the peintre animalier, and proposes that landscape pictures constituted an alternative market for academicians at times of diminished interest in classic genres.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
For the Greater Glory of Portugal: Cultural Policy and Artistic Trade in the Age of Joao V
S014 / 11:00–12:30, Room: T3-16: Mandeville Building
Organizer / Chair: Pilar Diez del Corral Corredoira
Alessandro Spila — Lusitanian Rome: Portuguese Diplomats and the Colonna Family
The crisis that hit the Papal States in the eighteenth century led organs curial the urgency of specific strategies in foreign policy for the conservation of papal supremacy on the latest Catholic monarchies. Since Pope Clement XI, the first measures to halt the decline were concentrate to effort diplomatic relations with the monarchs of Spain, Portugal and the Kingdom of Naples. Within such strategies, the great interest in the Roman culture demonstrated by John V of Braganza in the early eighteenth century started an intense artistic exchange with the Lusitanian court. The Colonna family, which lineage boasted more than any other relationships with Braganza and Bourbon of Spain, played a crucial role in this context, especially through the cardinals Carlo and Girolamo II, elevated at different times to the office of Maestro of the Apostolic Palaces, and most powerful referents to foreign ambassadors: the court of the Stuart (Catholic pretenders to the throne of England); the Spanish ambassador Medinaceli and the Portuguese dignitaries also. Already in studies on Bernardino Ludovisi, sculptor of the Colonna family and at the same time active in Mafra palace and in the chapel of St. John the Baptist to St. Rocco in Lisbon, emerged the close relations between the noble Roman family and the Ambassador Sampajo. The project intends to present some new source emerged from the Colonna archive relating to Roman residences of Portuguese representatives at Colonna palaces and villas in Rome, as a privileged occasion of artistic exchange between the two cultures. Sampajo lived from 1746 in the Pilotta palace (among the famous ruins of the temple of Serapis) restored for the occasion by Nicola Salvi, and obtained a summer residence in Marino. To these must be added the famous residence of the Bishop of Oporto near Palazzolo.
Pilar Diez del Corral Corredoira — The Portuguese Academy in Rome: The King’s Trading Point or a Proper Academy?
This paper explores the brief and unknown life of the Portuguese Academy in Rome. It was openned following the lead of the Académie de France in the early 20s and on 1728 it was closed as a result of a breakdown in the diplomatic relations with the Holy See. The article will address how it was founded and how political events provoked its sudden closure. With this approach, it will become clear the particular essence of that institution, a place to get an artistic education and at the same time a trading point for the Portuguese monarchy. This paper will also consider how the academy met the political, cultural and artistic aspirations of the King of Portugal, who seek to display his project of international recognition as a catholic monarch with a strong presence in Rome.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Art Markets (I)
S029(I) / 14:00–15:30, Room: T3-17: Mandeville Building
Organizer / Chair: Jan-Frans van Dijkhuizen
Camilla Murgia — (Un)fashionable Trades: Private Exhibitions as Art Market Strategies in Late Eighteenth-Century Paris
In 1776, French engraver Antoine Marcenay de Guy and German painter Johann Anton de Peters were responsible for opening a fine arts exhibition in the Colisée, a building located in one of Paris’s most known boulevards, the Champs-Elysées. Concerned with the success of the show, which too strongly recalled the Académie Royale’s Salons and potentially jeopardised them, the Comte d’Angiviller, France’s Interior Minister, ordered the business to close. Such a decision did not prevent, however, Parisians to develop a series of private exhibitions which offered parallel networks for artworks’ exchange at the end of the Ancien Regime. Indeed, these displays allowed the rise of alternative trade’s patterns going well beyond conventional art market commerce. In my paper, I will investigate these alternative practices, focussing on the impact they had on art commerce. To what extent did private exhibitions affect Parisian artistic world and determine its development? Why did art world’s professionals, such as painters, need alternative channels for artistic exchange? I’m interested in the diversity of trading these modalities generated. In a first instance, I will discuss the relationship between the number of private exhibitions of contemporary art which took place in late eighteenth-century Paris and the art market, in order to understand its impact on artworks’ circulation. These shows played a crucial role in artists’ careers inasmuch as a new perception of artworks developed. Functioning as a platform for contemporary art, private exhibitions represented a paramount trade strategy, leading to multiple issues relating to the art world, from artworks’ marketing to their recognition. In the second part of my paper, I will notably explore these values and their evolution. I will draw particular attention on the background allowing the rise of such a commercial policy and on the questioning of the art market they provoked.
Sune Schlitte — William Buchanan and the Emergence of a European Art Market in the Long Eighteenth Century
“West said that people were vain in being introducers of fine pictures to the country (William Buchanan).” In the long eighteenth century, collecting art was considered as an ornament of the developing states and served to enhance the symbolic capital of collectors and artists. William Buchanan a Scottish lawyer and son of a Glasgow hat manufacturer decided that “A small speculation might be entered into with every chance of success (Buchanan)” in the art market of the long eighteenth century. The overthrow of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars flooded the London market with old master paintings from the continent. In this period of time, the structures of an international art market arises, Academies, Museums, the modern artist and art dealer got established. The paper will discuss the negotiation process of the value and valuation of art in three steps. After a short general overview of the international art market it analyses James Irvines and William Buchanans attempts to establish themselves as art dealers in an art market which developed mainly between France, Great Britain and Italy. The won insights of the eighteenth-century art market should show that modern economic history can gain new insights in the developing of markets and prices by imbedding their structures in the social space. In summary the paper argues that without examining the historical genealogy of artists and traders which is based on a common legitimation it is impossible to understand the current debate about the value of art.
Gernot Mayer — Creating Networks, Collecting Paintings: The Art Collection and Cultural Policies of Wenzel Anton von Kaunitz-Rietberg (1711–1794)
Wenzel Anton von Kaunitz was without a doubt one of the most important statesmen of the eighteenth century. As State-Chancellor he shaped the Habsburg Monarchy from 1753 to 1792 and as the author of the Renversement des alliances—the so called ‘Diplomatic Revolution’—he developed a new alliance-system in Europe. Whereas Kaunitz was always regarded as a key figure of the politics of his time, an important aspect of his life and work has been largely neglected: Kaunitz was an outstanding amateur des arts, patron and collector. The political ambitions of the head of the Austrian Enlightenment party included also cultural aspects: He had a deep influence on the court theatre, supported and reformed the academy of fine arts, redesigned the Emperor’s gardens of the Schönbrunn palace (Vienna) and was responsible for the remodelling of the Imperial gallery. In addition, Kaunitz himself was an important collector: Although nowadays nearly unknown, his collection was once, apart from the Liechtenstein gallery, the largest private collection in eighteenth-century Vienna. As far as we know from contemporary guidebooks, the collection encompassed up to 2000 paintings. Many of these paintings had already been part of the older family collection. This nucleus was systematically expanded by the State-Chancellor, who used his diplomatic network—subordinated ambassadors, envoys or officials—to purchase new paintings. Another way he acquired artworks was through agents and art dealers. One of them, Christian von Mechel, developed—under the auspices of Kaunitz—the new display of the Imperial collection in the Upper Belvedere, organized with a new scientific approach by schools and time periods. The paper will focus on strategies, taste and aims of Wenzel Anton von Kaunitz as an art collector and will discuss his contacts to the European art market.
Renata Schellenberg — Mapping the Market: German Art Catalogues in the Eighteenth Century
Collecting was a popular pastime in eighteenth-century Germany. People indulged in the acquisition of material culture and amassed objects for purposes of aesthetic enjoyment and education. They also wrote about objects in their possession, generating a series of texts that reflected their personal affection for the collected item. The literacy of the collecting process improved most dramatically with the emergence of an independent art market. In the eighteenth century the German art market had expanded to accommodate a socially diverse range of consumers. And as more people participated in the purchasing and exchange of artifacts, there was a growing demand for a standardization of expression that would allow them to understand the process as a whole. Sales catalogues chronicled the development of this type of discourse, because as source material they were in immediate contact with both the market and its customers. Designed with an economic objective in mind, they were meant to facilitate the factual sale of items, but in doing so they communicated much more, divulging tastes, trends, venues as well as the purchasing strategies inherent to collecting practices of the age. Furthermore, because they refer to actual items, and not models or brands (as a fair catalogue would) they reveal real patterns of collecting, providing an itemized trace of the availability of and aesthetic taste in material objects of the age. This paper analyzes a sample of sale catalogues from art markets in Hamburg, Dresden and Frankfurt, positing that these texts represent not only an important document of the age, but are a valuable commodity in their own right.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Art Markets (II)
S029(II) / 16:00–17:30, Room: T3-17: Mandeville Building
Organizer / Chair: Jan-Frans van Dijkhuizen
Bárbara García Menéndez — Two Spanish Clients for the Neoclassical Painter Angelica Kauffman
The conclusions of our investigation of two paintings that the great neoclassical painter Angelica Kauffman (1741–1807) made for two Spanish clients will be presented in this paper. These canvases are especially singular, because their history has been fully documented from the moment on which they were commissioned in Rome, in very close dates at the end of the eighteenth century (1796 and 1797). They are also two of the very few works by the artist than can be seen nowadays in Spanish public collections. The first of these paintings, a beautiful canvas of Saint Joseph and the Child (Museum of Fine Arts of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain) has gone unnoticed to Kauffman’s historiography. But our study has gathered detailed references of its provenance, the consecutive Asturian owners, and also of its models and influences (Mengs’ style, known by Kauffman in Italy, and the huge presence of Murillo in eighteenth-century Britain, which she assumed in London via Sir Joshua Reynolds) and of three nineteenth-century copies of the painting. The other one is a portrait of the Spanish Jesuit and erudite Lorenzo Hervás y Panduro (1735–1809), that has been already published, but ignoring that Kauffman painted another copy. In 1797 the painter was hired by Hervás to have him portrayed, probably for a private Jesuit portrait gallery in Rome, but the whereabouts of this canvas remains currently unknown. The one that can be studied today is a replica that, regarding their friendship, Kauffman made and gave to her client. On his return to Spain, Hervás took the painting to his home, in Horcajo de Santiago (Cuenca). After his death, it remained in his family’s property until it was donated to the Royal Academy of History, in 1868, where it is still kept today.
Christine Gofroy-Gallardo — Paintings’ Exchanges during the Early Years of the Louvre Museum
Although they discreetly favor the dispersal of paintings in Paris, eighteenth-century amateurs refuse all comparison with professional dealers. These collectors take advantage of their network of correspondents abroad to acquire drawings, paintings or engravings from all Europe. They maintain relations of a so-called ‘honest business’, in which exchange or donation is often considered as the only acceptable economic practice. At that time, the exchange of paintings between amateurs is not only practiced in the context of private relations, but it also occurs within the new establishment of the Louvre. Due to the lack of financial resources, the first Museum’s curators do not hesitate to turn to this process in order to obtain the lacking masterpieces of their collection. Dealers and private individuals spontaniously suggest to administrators a procedure of exchange of exceptional paintings in return of paintings of less interest. Apart from private individuals, the Grand Duke of Tuscany does not hesitate to directly suggest to the Louvre an exchange of paintings of the royal gallery of Florence against an artwork of Le Sueur, which he desires fervently. Excited by this proposal, the Louvre’s administration seems ready to accept more exchanges to fill the Museum’s gaps. However, the extremely explicit lists of paintings of French commissioners shock the representative of the Grand Duke who wishes to give a friendly aspect to this negotiation. After the confiscation of noble immigrants’ possessions under the French Revolution, aristocrats such as Prince de Conti obtain by the government a restitution of requisitioned paintings and works of art. The arrival of Vivant Denon to the Louvre’s direction puts an end to the practice of the trade exchanges. Henceforth, no private individual should to boast to possess a painting subtracted from the public collections.
Maria Constança Peres Pissarra — Les Arts, le Commerce et les Lumières
Pour le XVIIIème. siècle, contre la disette et la misère, un bon gouvernement doit constituer des réserves de grains et encourager les cultivateurs. Celle-là c ́est une condition élémentaire du bonheur. Sans le luxe la civilization n ́est pas possible car le superflu c’est chose très nécessaire et rend heureux les hommes, au même temps que stimule l’industrie, l’agriculture, le commerce. Ceux- ci est la source du bien-être et de la prospérité et fait aussi la richesse et la forces des nations. Donc, la civilization trouve son couronnement dans les beaux-arts qui adoucissent les moeurs, et aussi sur les lettres que nourissent l’âme. Mais, selon le fragment Le luxe, le commerce et les arts, de Jean- Jacques Rousseau, “puisque le commerce et les arts ne sont dans une nation qu’une preuve de besoins et que l’argent n’est point une preuve de véritable richesse il s’ensuit que la réunion de toutes ces choses n’est point non plus une preuve de bonheur’. (Fragments, p. 523) Si Rousseau nous a déjá parlé dans le Discours sur les sciences et les arts sur les questions du luxe, du commerce et des arts par rapport aux moeurs, ça ne l’empêche pas de reprendre ces discussions dans le fragment ci- dessus, mais d’un autre point de vue, c ́est à dire, de la prospérité de l’État ou d’un point de vue politique. Pour mieux comprendre la question du commerce et des arts il faut retenir la critique de Rousseau au luxe: “De la société et du luxe qu ́elle engendre, naissent les Arts libéraux et mécaniques, le Commerce, les Lettres; et toutes des inutilités qui font fléá la curir l ́industrie, enrichissent et perdent les États”. (Discours sur l’inégalité, note IX). C ́est le but de cette communication.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Art and Commerce. Continent Allegories in the Baroque Age: The Role of the Jesuit Order
S031 / 16:00–17:30, Room: M1-08: Leuven: Van Der Goot Building
Organizer / Chair: Wolfgang Schmale
Katrin Sterba — The Depiction of Allegories of the Four Continents in Prints and Baroque Ceiling Paintings in Jesuit Churches in Germany, Austria, and the Czech Republic
St Franz Xaver is the most popular missionary of the Jesuits. As a friar of St Ignatius of Loyola, he is often depicted in the interior decoration of Jesuit churches. Andrea Pozzo painted Franz Xaver’s Glorification on the ceiling frescos in the Jesuit church of Mondovi already 15 years before his masterpiece in the church of Sant’ Ignazio in Rome. In both paintings, the saints are surrounded by allegories of continents. But in the reception of this subject in the interior decoration of Jesuit churches in Germany, Austria or the Czech Republic—countries the Jesuits had successfully evangelised in the seventeenth and eighteenth century—St Franz Xaver is depicted baptising or evangelising Africans and Indians. However the portrayal of the indigenous people is influenced by the illustration of allegory of continents, which often appears together with St Ignatius. The most popular example for this subject is Pozzo’s Glorification of Saint Ignatius in Sant’ Ignazio in Rome. But Pozzo was not the inventor of this iconographical subject. It had already been established and spread by copperplate prints as the World mission of the Jesuits (1664) by Bartholomäus Kilian and Johann Christoph Storer or Ignatius of Loyola and the world mission of the Jesuits (1675) by Johann Kilian. Prints of allegories of continents were published in several books as e. g. in Mathias Tanner’s collection of the martyrdoms of Jesuit missionaries or in Heinrich Scherer’s description of the worldwide mission of the Jesuits. These illustrations of the allegories influenced also the baroque ceiling paintings in Jesuit churches in the evangelised countries; but they have been painted after the Catholic mission has already been done. Hence the monumental frescos and altarpieces show the successful mission of the Jesuits worldwide. Oba, Haruka: Using the Past for the Church “Present” and “Future”. The Remembrance of the Catholic Japan in Dramas and Arts in Southern Germany In the late sixteenth century, the missionary of the Jesuits were very successful in Japan. Many Japanese converted to Catholicism. However, the situation took a turn to the bad as the Japanese authority began to persecute these followers, which led to the twenty-six martyrs of Nagasaki. In Europe the Jesuits were taken by surprise of this development. In the seventeenth century, they began to refer to this history of Catholic Japan in dramas and arts related to the Jesuits school with the aim of promoting overseas missionary. This activity continued into the eighteenth century, although the Catholic Church could not see any more possibilities for reviving the missionary in Japan. Especially in Southern Germany, the Jesuit Drama about Japan belonged to the regular repertoire of Jesuits schools (e.g. in Konstanz) from the late 1730s to 1750s. At the same time the iconography of the four continents as well as the pictorial memorial of the Nagasaki martyrs in churches and the amount of applications for the Jesuit missionary abroad (esp. submitted by farmers, craftsmen, doctors from rural regions) flourished. Based on case studies concerning the Jesuit schools in Konstanz, Dillingen an der Donau and Landsberg am Lech, the presentation aims on the one hand by focusing on the relation between the Jesuit Drama on Japan and the pictures of the Japanese Martyrs to explain, how this constant revival of this Japanese past of the society is connected to the present and till this day unexplained prosperity of the iconography of the four continents and the applications for the Jesuit missionary abroad. On the other hand it will also be taken into consideration, how the jubilee of the Saint Francis Xavier in 1741, who had arrived in Goa 200 years ago and had become the patron for the missionary abroad since the seventeenth century, influenced the Jesuit Drama on Japan and the applications for the overseas missionary.
Claudio Ferlan — A Global Context for Communication Strategies in the Jesuits’ Colleges in Klagenfurt and Gorizia (XVII–XVIII centuries)
Since the early moments of its presence in Austria, the Jesuits had to face the problem of communicating in German as a matter of urgency in all the missionary areas. In regions dominated by Lutheranism they aimed at addressing people who were unable to speak and understand Latin. The Society of Jesus responded with different solutions to this pastoral urgency: recruitment of German speaking people, study, interactions based on gestures, symbols and images. Especially this last aspect is going to be explored in this paper by focusing on the Colleges of Klagenfurt (founded in 1604) and Gorizia (1615) and their forms of communication of the sacred. Starting out with an analyses of the first communication strategies used by the Jesuits in the two cities in the early years of settlement, the advancement of such strategies in the eighteenth century, when after the end of the Thirty Years’ War Lutheranism was apparently defeated, will be put at the center of my presentation. The eighteenth century was a time in which the pastoral urgency changes. The resistance to Lutheranism has been successful. Its growth has been stopped. There comes a time for teaching, catechizing, educating. The change of the political and religious context demanded new methods of presence within civil society. The Jesuits organized them through the development of techniques originated from their experience and tested worldwide. I will analyze in particular the use of theater, processions, preaching and catechesis. These communication tools are used outside the classroom in order to widen the contact of the Jesuits with the population, beyond the students’ audience. My aim is to describe the process of change in the Jesuit model of communication based on a comparative analysis of the two colleges, but constantly taking into account the reality of the mission in general.
Christoph Nebgen — The Influence of the New World’s Image on Religious Vocations on the Old World
The spirituality of the Society of Jesus is mainly based on the human capacity of imagination (spiritual exercises). When this religious order, founded by Ignatius of Loyola, became one of the most important actors in the field of Christian missions in Asia, Africa and America in the second half of the sixteenth century, imaginations and allegories of these new exotic fields of Christian—or better Roman Catholic—missions took place in its self-representation. In the great variety of already existing religious orders these overseas missions were a special trait for the SJ. Especially for young men interested in an ecclesial career it represented a particular possibility to realize their point of interest. To become a heroic missionary like Francis Xavier or José de Anchieta was one of the most favourable options for a young catholic in the baroque and post-tridentine mentality. The SJ used the presentation of their overseas missions in different media for a public representation of their own profile: in theatre, painting, martyrologies and even songs their commitment in the New World was mentioned. As a consequence, many people joined the SJ to once become an overseas missionary themselves.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
T U E S D A Y , 2 8 J U L Y 2 0 1 5
Art and Commerce: Continent Allegories in the Baroque Age
S056 / 11:00–12:30, Room: M1-09: Bergen: Van Der Goot Building
Organizer / Chair: Wolfgang Schmale
Josef Koestlbauer — Allegories of the Four Continents: Images as Historical Sources
Allegories of the four continents were a popular theme in the baroque era. In southern Germany, Tyrol and Alto Adige representations of the four continents can be found predominantly within sacral buildings, primarily in village churches. This stands in marked contrast to their occurrence in the East of the former Austrian hereditary lands where it was mainly the old orders of Benedictines, Augustinians, and Cistercians as well as the nobility, who favored this iconography for the decoration of their newly established monasteries and palaces. These allegories—even though they were of undoubtedly stereotypical character—transported learned knowledge about the world. Unfortunately the interpretation of these images poses serious methodological problems. To understand their symbolic and discursive functions we find ourselves in a paradoxical situation: the images are both the object of research and the most important source. This paper will present some approaches to tackling this problem. First, by tracing post-tridentine concepts of the significance and functions of images. Second, by looking at artists, patrons, and communities involved in commissioning images of the four continents in eighteenth-century Tyrolean churches. The systematic survey of allegories of the four continents is being currently documented in an interactive digital collection containing detailed photographic records and descriptions. The presentation will showcase cartographical and chronological visualizations, as well as tools for comparing and annotating pictorial sources.
Britta Kägler — Baroque Building Sites: The Links between Culture and Economy in Eighteenth-Century Germany
Baroque architecture is characteristic for Catholic regions of early modern territories, especially in the South of the Holy Roman Empire, e.g. in Bavaria, Tyrol and the Prince-Bishoprics of Freising, Augsburg and Würzburg. Though (art) historical research traditionally focussed on churches and monasteries, also parish churches were constructed and baroque architecture, with its ephemeral interaction of form, decoration, representation and their elements of scenery emerged since the 1680s experienced a breakthrough and led to constant competition between bishops, abbots, abbesses, princes, nobles and even commoners. For this reason, there was an increasing number of castles owned by nobles, town halls in the possession of commoners and privately‐owned palaces. This raises several questions: What did eventually lead to the (re‐)opening of baroque building sites and the transformation of earlier architectural forms along baroque lines? And how to raise money for the huge amount of construction sites facing the late seventeenth and especially the eighteenth century which had to deal with financial crises and a high pressure on modernisation? My paper deals with these links between economy and art. The process from initial planning to financing, on to the actual construction with native as well as foreign craftsmen will be analysed based on case studies from Bavaria and Swabia. Contrary to expectations, economic history of baroque architecture has not been systematically explored so far. Few fields of historical research have drifted as far apart as economic and cultural history. A wide-spread trend of de-historicisation of economic research and its equivalent, and a largely de-economised new cultural history is noticeable. With the ‘cultural turn’ in historiography many new topics have emerged. The spectrum spans history of discourse, history of mentalities and history of experience as well as history of the human body and history of madness.
Marion Romberg — Illud vero diligenter doceant episcopi: Allegories of the Four Continents in the Context of Catholic Teaching of Laymen
The iconography of the four continents dates back to the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, at a time when the European people were confronted with the foreignness of New Worlds in the scope of their discovery and conquest. At first used almost exclusively as an element of manorial decoration programs, it started to flourish in the eighteenth century. This involved a remarkable vertical transfer as the allegories of the four continents expanded from manors and palaces to village churches, especially so in the territories of southern Germany, Tyrol, and South Tyrol. The visual language of the elites infiltrates the province. Up till now interpretations of various interior programs neglected mostly the allegories because it seemed that the meaning and role of these allegories were clear: They represented the world. However, a closer look regarding their positioning as well as iconography and by placing them in a greater cultural, social, and political context on a macro- and microlevel provides new insights in their role of influencing public believes in the course of the fight against the reformation. Based on several examples from the diocese of Augsburg the presentation aims to scrutinize this iconography within sacred images as a tool to teaching laymen, as degreed by the Council of Trento in 1563. The focus lies on the special relationship of the clerical or noble principals, their mainly locally working artists and its rural audience in ordering, creating and examining this iconography.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Critiquing the Rococo in the Century of Lights
S063 / 11:00–12:30, Room: T3-06: Mandeville Building
Organizer / Chair: Olaf Recktenwald
Gauvin Bailey — Rococo and Enlightenment in Late Colonial Brazil
In Brazil Rococo lasted longer than in any part of the world, still promoting the style as the very image of modernity as late as the late 1820s—less than a decade before the first Rococo revival movement, under King Louis-Philippe (1830–48) in France. It would be easy to dismiss this late manifestation of Rococo as the poor taste of uncultured colonials. Yet the level of intellectual engagement in the Enlightenment salons of places like Minas Gerais was far from uncultured and progressive patrons—including freedom-fighters in Brazil’s first independence movement, the Inconfidência Mineira (1788–89)—directly supported some of the greatest monuments of the international Rococo, such as the church of São Francisco in Ouro Preto (1766–1802), financed in part by Enlightenment poet Cláudio Manuel da Costa. The leading intellectuals of the day read the latest philosophical and religious treatises from Paris and modelled their lives—and, I argue, their approach to religion—on their examples. Brazil (and its Spanish neighbours to the South) had an exceptional understanding of Rococo: unlike in urban Europe where it came to be seen as outmoded and corrupt, Rococo appealed to a growing Enlightenment-inspired aesthetic in Brazil that sought a return to logic and clarity, especially in church design. Printed model altarpieces from Paris and Augsburg provided a lightness and transparency of structure that were a welcome escape from the heavy, ornament- saturated altarpieces of the Hispanic Baroque or even the bulky Rococo of Portugal—both popularly associated with colonialism. Rococo décor’s references to the natural world, luxury, and pleasurable sensations also harmonized with a new French-inspired theology of happiness promoted by reformist thinkers. The people of South America went further than any other region in acknowledging something that perhaps only rural Central Europe was willing to admit: Rococo’s essential modernity.
Carl Magnusson — Neither Rococo nor Neoclassical: The In-Betweens of the History of French Eighteenth-Century Styles
The historiography of French eighteenth-century art is founded upon the opposition between rococo and neoclassicism. This caricatural point of view is mainly due to a biased interpretation of the critical discourses that emerged around 1750 and targeted the so-called mauvais goût of contemporary French painting and interior decoration, in order to bring forth an artistic regeneration. The writings of La Font de Saint-Yenne, the abbé Le Blanc, Cochin, Blondel and Diderot, but also those of Winckelmann, have been used to define categories that rely upon a specious dichotomy, opposing superficiality to deepness, whimsicality to rationality and feminity to virility. A closer reading of these sources reveals an overall much more complex situation. The défenseurs du bon goût advocating for a radical change were in fact very few and most of them would have agreed with the words of
the marquis de Marigny : ‘’Je ne veux point de chicorée moderne ; je ne veux point de l’austère ancien ; mezzo l’uno, mezzo l’altro.’’ Convenance condemned austerity as much as whimsicality. My paper aims to show the impact of these misreadings on the definition of the historiographical status of objects produced during the second half of the eighteenth century. Most of them are regarded as not pure enough to be affiliated with neoclassicism. They are often described as by-products of a belated rococo spirit or as caricatures of truer neoclassicism (Honour, 1968). They are stuck inbetween two irreconciliable categories, which result from an unnuanced view of the Siècle des Lumières, and classified in various more or less fanciful categories, such as Louis XVI, Marie-Antoinette, Transition or, more recently, Antique fleuri. These sub-styles, however, far from lessening their already inessential status, tend to stress it.
Michael Yonan — Friedrich August Krubsacius, Enlightenment Formal Systems, and the Rococo Material World
This paper analyzes the ideas of the self-proclaimed Enlightenment critic Friedrich August Krubsacius (1718–1789), whose Gedanken von dem Ursprunge, Wachstume, und Verfalle der Verzierungen in den schönen Künsten exemplifies a broader eighteenth-century German critique of rococo design. My goal will be to explore two aspects of rococo art’s theoretical underpinnings by examining Krubsacius’s ideas. The first will be to demonstrate that in the visual and semantic complexity of rococo prints lies the conceptual basis of rococo design broadly conceived. The second will be to show that those prints achieve this through more than a simple exploration of formal qualities; they also engage in a proto-scientific examination of perception in the material world. By ‘material world’, I refer to represented objects, ranging from flowers to shells to leaves and even incorporating living or once living creatures. By asking viewers to approach the representation of things with a specific mindset—indeed, creating that mindset through the structures of representation employed—rococo prints invite them to assume specific stances toward art. Those who can assume that position find in the rococo a celebration of artistic ingenuity and, more profoundly, a theorization of human sensation. Those who could not would find their critical sensibilities stifled, confused, or at worse eradicated. Many eighteenth-century figures who chose to write about the rococo, including Krubsacius, fell into this latter category. He critiques the rococo as an art of aesthetic nonsense and pointless mixing, but I shall argue that he is wrong, and in the substance of his critique can be detected the broader terms of his Enlightenment aesthetics.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Global Perspectives On the Enlightenment: Transnational Mediations
S092 / 16:00–17:30, Room: T3-17: Mandeville Building
Organizer / Chair: Rienk Vermij
Chihyin Hsiao — Chinese Porcelain for Some London Merchants: Their Business and Family Life in the Eighteenth Century
Predominately regarded as art collectors’ items, Chinese export porcelain has received limited attention from researchers of English social history. Only in the last decade have historians begun to recognize the potential of Chinese export porcelain as a social indicator and its significant impact on English material culture. In response to this novel approach, my research aims to contextualize a specific type of Chinese export porcelain commissioned by emerging London merchants and further investigate how Chinese porcelain are used as objects for social events such as company banquets, tea parties and drinking games in the eighteenth century. Large numbers of Chinese porcelain suggest business achievements and family alliances are two of the most celebrated genres. The subject matters reflect a thriving mercantile life when London became the entrepôt of Europe and the destination of world luxury. They record personal history as well as signifying merchants’ sense of self and a shared culture of belonging. I, therefore, propose to treat these porcelains as the early example of customized singular commodity. Principally, I will argue that Chinese export porcelain is an alternative material for London merchants who desired to own artifacts of greater refinement but not necessarily of opulence. Subsequently various ceramic productions are compared and discussed within this socio-economic setting.
Tetyana Kairova — Le texte épistolaire dans l’émergence d’un nouvel esprit à travers l’ Europe des Lumières
Comme les gens, à travers l’Europe, les formes et les idées circulent … (Martine de Rougemont) Dans sa communication, le Docteur ès lettres, maître de conférences au Département de Langues romanes de l’Université d’Etat de la région de la Mer Noire Petro Moghyla (Mykolaïv, Ukraine) présente les textes épistolaires comme un phénomène majeur et brillant de la vie dans l’Europe du XVIIIe siècle. en analysant sous l’angle linguistique et anthropologique la correspondance internationale, les tendances et les particularités de la communication à distance de la société européenne de l’époque, l’auteur examine la nature, les traits caractéristiques, les avantages et le fonctionnement du type de texte épistolaire tel que la lettre dans la vie des Européens, et s’efforce de pénétrer le mécanisme des contacts intellectuels à distance qui contribue à la propagation des nouvelles idées des Lumières en Europe et dans le monde. Plusieurs pays européens sont évoqués dans le récit : la France, la Russie, la Pologne et d’autres, ainsi que les ombres du grand et brillant Voltaire, de l’Impératrice russe Catherine II, de ses diplomates et de ses sujets, de Jean Potocki, aristocrate polonais, né en Ukraine, formé en France et en Suisse et ayant vécu au confluent des cultures européennes Ils surgissent devant nos yeux, entourés d’autres Européens, pour illustrer les réflexions de l’auteur sur l’influence des différentes cultures entre elles et le rôle des textes épistolaires dans l’émergence en Europe d’un nouvel esprit des Lumières. Cette correspondance, marquée par la connaissance des civilisations anciennes et modernes, permet d’observer la circulation de l’information dans l’espace et dans le temps en synchronie et diachronie et de dégager une image stéréoscopique du monde se reflétant dans son microcosme et faisant de ces textes épistolaires des carrefours de civilisations, ce qui nous permet de les considérer comme des objets de culture.
Julia Shapchenko — Polish Artistic Communities in the Russian Empire in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries
In the beginning – the 1st half of XIX century the community of Polish men in Saint Petersbourg was quite large and had an influence over Russian culture. The Polish art communities scaled step by step mostly because the St. Petersburg Academy of Arts drew many young people keen on arts. In the 1st tertial of XIX century the Academy became Alma Mater for many Poles, who studied there( I. Tylinsky, F. Slyuzhinsky, X. Kanev and others). After graduation from the Academy some of them painted members of the Russian royal family or devotional pictures while others declared for historical painting (J. Sukhodolsky, Kamiński, T. Gorki, L. Strashinsky). At the same time many mature artists of Russian Western provinces moved in St. Petersburg looking for a job. Though ome of them became gainfully employed, while others had to shorten their stay, such as C. Rusetsky with no patronage and money to spare. Many of the most independent Polish artists looked “to the West rather than to the East” preferred internship and work in Vienna, Munich and Paris. Among them were mature painters J. Kossak, P. Michael, H. Rodakovsky, A. Grotter, J. Matejko. Thanks largely to such famous Polish masters as R. Zhukovsky and I. Schedrovsky Russian genre enriched with scenes of Russian pot culture. Schedrovsky created albums of lithographs called “Here we are” and “Gold may be easily told “. Being a good cartoonist Zhukovsky collaborated with some popular magazines such as “Illustration”, “Spark”, “Splinter” and “Pantheon”. C. Yasevitch gained a reputation of book illustration and icon restoration master. Besides that he taught in the Academy of Arts supporting poor students. The most widely known both in Russia and Poland was a freelance artist and engraver A. Orlovsky, who depicted people of all social classes, from courtiers to peasants. Orlovsky one of the first painters created a lithographed series of nations living throughout Russian Empire.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Markets and the Aesthetic in Scotland
E314 / 14:00–15:30, Room: M1-17: Tokyo: Van Der Goot Building
Panel of the Eighteenth-Century Scottish Studies Society
Chair: John Cairns
Endre Szecsenyi — The Aesthetic and Social Nature of Laughter in Francis Hutcheson
Laughter was an eminent moral philosophical and anthropological issue in the era of Francis Hutcheson, and its primary context was of enthusiasm and religious toleration, and of moral criticism. Hutcheson’s Reflections upon Laughter (1725), however, can also be fruitfully interpreted from the angle of his aesthetic thought elaborated in his Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue (1725) and Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections (1728), especially if the scope of ‘aesthetic’ is not confined to the categories of beauty and harmony, or comedy and wit. Hutcheson seems to consider the topic of laughter as a new type of experience, as a new class of “innocent pleasures” associated with, and inspired by, Joseph Addison’s “pleasures of the imagination” (1712). While Addisonian beauty, greatness (sublimity), and novelty can be experienced in solitude, laughter is genuinely social and sociable. Hutcheson’s “sense of ridiculous,” one of our internal senses, by means of which laughter becomes possible, belongs to the tradition of (social) taste dating from at least Baltasar Gracián, and to that of the Roman Stoic sensus communis (from Marcus Aurelius to Shaftesbury), and not to that of epistemological or even artistic “imagination.” Modern aesthetic experience has several roots, one of which is undoubtedly the Italian, Spanish, French discourse of je ne sais quoi, which, though it also gains its paradigmatic examples from interpersonal relationships (love, friendship), expresses a kind of secret attraction, enchantment, charm. Addison’s aesthetic experience owes much to this conception. Laughter as aesthetic experience in Hutcheson’s essays, however, is an expansion of the Addisonian “aesthetic.” Here openness, sociability, eventually toleration can be felt and interiorized in the pleasure of laughter. This kind of “aesthetic” experience is not a rudimentary step toward morality but rather an inevitable frame and precondition of morality.
Michael Brown — The Aesthetics of Political Economy
The origins of political economy have rarely been connected to a concern for the beautification of the world. However the Scottish Enlightenment corpus on political economy has numerous writers who reflected on both economics and aesthetics in their work. This paper proposes that the two fields of intellectual enquiry were intimately related and that the process of reading them as a shared enterprise sheds surprising light on the conclusions drawn in the field of political economy (successful economic solutions were to be aesthetically pleasing) and on the literary presentation of economic writings (which evince an aesthetic concern for system and form). The paper will concentrate on Francis Hutcheson and Dugald Stewart, case studies which bookend the Scottish Enlightenment movement.
Cairns Craig — Plant Nurseries, Botanic Gardens and the Aesthetics of Nature
From the time of Philip Miller’s influence at the Chelsea Physic Garden in the 1720s, Scots gardeners in London played a key role in the introduction of new plants into British horticulture. Many of them, like Thomas Blaikie (1758–1838), went from gardening apprentices to international ‘plant hunters’ before establishing careers as garden designers—in Blaikie’s case in and around Paris in the 1780s. Garden design was shaped by the introduction of new plants and the major nursery for the propagation and sale of those new plants was the Lee and Kennedy Vineyard nursery in Hammersmith. James Lee, originally from Jedburgh, became an internationally recognized botanist as a result of popularization of the Linnaean system in his Introduction to Botany of 1760. It was to compete with the international collections of the Vineyard Nursery that the Earl of Bute established the gardens at Kew that would later become the center for British botanic collections. The evolution of the botanic garden and of garden design in the late eighteenth century would lead to the development of a style that the most influential Scottish writer on gardens in the nineteenth century, John Claudius Loudon, would designate the ‘gardenesque’—the presentation together of plants which had no natural affinity. This gardening revolution between the 1720s and 1790s is reflected in the role of gardens in the development of eighteenth century aesthetic theory in Scotland, from Francis Hutcheson’s An Inquiry Concerning Beauty, Order, Harmony, Design to Archibald Alison’s Essays on the Nature and Principles of Taste.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
W E D N E S D A Y , 2 9 J U L Y 2 0 1 5
Pictures in Motion: Portraiture around the World (II)
S104(I) / 11:00–12:30, Room: T3-06: Mandeville Building
Organizer / Chair: Jennifer Germann
Kee Il Choi — Face Time with the Qianlong Emperor: A Qing Imperial Portrait Completed at Sevres
In early 1773, the Qianlong emperor (r. 1736–95) granted three sittings to the Italian Jesuit painter, Jesuit Giuseppe Panzi (1734–1812). Father Joseph Amiot (1718–93) subsequently sent the resulting oil sketch to Henri-Léonard Bertin (1720–92), a French minister of state to both Louis XV and Louis XVI. This paper reconstructs how the portrait was first captured in China as a contextual preface for its reception in France. Though a European artist, Panzi was compelled to work within a strictly prescribed Qing imperial artistic practice, where such bust likenesses served as preparatory sketches for full length scrolls, which were then displayed in a pantheon of imperial virtue. In France, Bertin had the portrait translated twice by French artists at the Sèvres factory. The bust length model was directly copied on a painted porcelain plaque (1776); and a second derivative of Panzi’s original was adapted into a full-length sculpture in biscuit porcelain (1775–76) by Josse-François Leriche (174–1812). In this translation from two to three dimensions, the portrait was transmuted from a Qing imperial image of virtue into a European monument of an enlightened, learned ruler, a vision originally conceived and contextualized by Amiot within a larger project to promote within Europe the 100 most celebrated Chinese in history. This grand commemorative initiative evoked Titon du Tillet’s Parnasse François, and was directly contemporary with the Comte d’Angiviller’s project to promote the Grands Hommes of France, also for their virtuous service to the king. Henri Bertin expanded Amiot’s vision to encompass other porcelains that celebrated the Qianlong emperor as chief guardian of China’s ancient past as well as the responsible steward of the empire’s natural resources. This unheralded Sino-French material culture narrative permits us to consider the question, ‘How does portraiture help us to understand what it meant to be global in the eighteenth century?’
Christina Lindeman — Going Dutch: The Convergence of Fijnschilder Conventions in Self-Portraits of Eighteenth-Century German-Speaking Artists
In 1781, Sir Joshua Reynolds, president of the British Royal Academy, travelled through Holland, the Low Countries, and their neighboring Germanic states. While visiting the art collection of Johann Wilhelm, Elector of Palatine in the city of Düsseldorf, one painting in particular caught his eye, Gerrit Dou’s The Quack (1652). Of the painting Reynolds wrote, “It is very highly finished, but it has nothing interesting in it. Gerrit Dow himself is looking from a window with his palette and pencils in his hand.” Although Reynolds admired Dou’s technical skill it was the subject matter that disinterested him. One can surmise that Reynolds did not appreciate Dou’s realistic depiction of an artist’s life and instead preferred to idealize artistic life within the trappings of academia. Unlike Reynolds’s dismay over Dutch art, there were several German-speaking artists who adopted the fijnschilder convention of the artist in the windowsill in their own self-portraits. The importance of the window in seventeenth-century Holland is evident in portraits and genre scenes alike, making it a focal point of daily life. The image that Dou recreated of the seventeenth-century artist peering from his studio’s window onto a crowded city street demonstrated the interconnectedness of the artist’s growing profession within this rising urban culture. These paintings echoed the new economic and mercantilist growth in several German cities during the eighteenth century. This paper intends to examine the impact of seventeenth-century Dutch art on eighteenth-century artists particularly their adoption of the windowsill in their own self-portraits. In doing so, we turn attention to the circulation of Dutch art and collections within Germany, and the impact of travel to Holland and the Low Countries as sites for inspiration rather than the Grand Tour to Italy.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Pictures in Motion: Portraiture around the World (III)
S104(II) /14:00–15:30, Room: T3-06: Mandeville Building
Organizer / Chair: Jennifer Germann
George Stringer — The Commodity of Myth: Anglo-Indian Portraiture at the Edge of Empire
For over a century and a half since the British East India Company first began trading in India, sending home accurate visual descriptions of the country seems to have had a low priority. India was a coastal resource with an unknown interior full of fabled riches. It was not until 1769 that Britain’s first professional artist arrived to practice there. Tilly Kettle’s inaugural on-site portrait of an Indian ruler (Muhammad Ali Khan, Nawab of Arcot, c.1770) impressed Londoners, signalling the start of an exclusive, exotic portrait trade. Kettle’s artistic identity was more fully tested in his ambiguous role as resident foreigner and first point of contact with local painters in the northern buffer state of Awadh. What marked this moment of cultural convergence? Perhaps the most natural impulse might have been to find common artistic ground, yet this shifted continually, as recent appraisals (by Eaton, Rajan, and others) suggest. In this paper, I argue that shared social values in portrait content were overshadowed by aesthetic alterity, their fluctuations reflecting the fortunes of the portrait trade itself. Beginning with a comparable domestic paradigm in children’s portraits, I show how the change in subject matter to more adult pastimes during the heyday of colonial portraiture echoed a wider loss of innocence, and metropolitan anxiety about Company corruption. What began as a moment of ‘anthropological’ clarity in Anglo-Indian portraiture soon became incongruous, hybridised; such part- observed portraits or conversation pieces veered uncomfortably close to reality, and had to make way for a more picturesque view of India which ultimately proved more widely marketable.
Lianming Wang — Giuseppe Castiglione (1688–1766) and Manchu Portraits Revisited
Shaped by unprecedented styles and techniques imported by European artists, a new type of Sino- European portrait painting for picturing the emperor as well as his family, emerged in Qianlong’s (1736–95) Manchu court. As one of the key figures, Giuseppe Castiglione’s (Ch. Lang Shining, 1688–1766) training in Italy stimulated radical changes that immediately distinguish his portrait works from all else; for the emperor, his children and concubines he produced a great number of portraits, including portraits that being included in the court interiors decorated according to pictorial schema derived from European illusionistic modes. This paper aims to address the transcultural exchange between China and Europe with a primary focus on Castiglione’s (illusionistic) portraits in light of Jesuit missionary environment and the Qing’s exposure to European science/arts (mathematics, Geometry/ central perspective, chiaroscuro and oil painting) in the eighteenth century. A key area that remains unresolved in the large scope of Sino-Jesuit exchange is an in-depth understanding of Castiglione’s own artistic formation in Italy (where he made portraits for the Duke of Genua) before his arrival in China and the precise tools and techniques that he learned from Andrea Pozzo. Questions that need attention are: What are the primary artistic and technical features of the school(s) from which Jesuit painters emerged that would specifically impact Qing portraits? What features of Castiglione’s training, which made it possible for him to translate techniques used in Christian sacred images into portraits for the Manchu court? How did Castiglione and his Chinese colleagues experiment with different materials, genres, techniques, and formats that encode certain attitudes? And ultimately, how did his technical skills inspire particular types of experimentation, e.g. the ‘illusionistic portraits’ at Manchu court?
Aneta Zahradnik — Travelling Portraits: The Collection of Austrian Archduchess Maria Anna (1738–89)
My paper will present the results of a recently completed research project investigating a newly discovered eighteenth-century portraiture collection which once belonged to the eldest surviving daughter of Maria Theresia, archduchess Maria Anna. The collection consists of 122 portraits, oil paintings and pastels, representing four generations of the Hapsburg family and contemporary clerics as well as numerous children’s portraits. The project’s main objectives were a contextualization of the artworks within regional and transregional art production and distribution. The study aimed to reconstruct their historical presentation at Maria Anna’s palace in Klagenfurt, in order to describe their representational and memorial functions. The collection reflects the strong impact of Maria Theresia’s interest in the representation of the Habsburg family, where continuity and serial production of portraits played a central role. It illustrates the information and exchange through portraiture between the different European courts as a means of proving the cohesion of the Hapsburg siblings who lived at various residences in France, Italy and Austria… A considerable number of these portraits repeats and cites well-known eighteenth-century (group) portraits sometimes kept elsewhere in the family, and brought to Maria Anna in order to maintain her connection to the family. Also, the portraits are always already conceived as existing in series and groups, quite differently from a notion of portraiture as expressing individualistic singularity. They clearly served to establish networks, group and family identities. Indeed, as I would like to argue, the collection is of special interest as a prime example of portraiture in circulation, touching upon issues such as exchange, reference and citation. The practices of citation and repetition should not only be perceived as marks of second-rate art. Instead, analyzing these may lead to insights into the culture of court portraiture and a better understanding of genre conventions.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Selling Old Master Paintings on the European Art Market
S129 / 16:00–17:30, Room: M1-16: Heidelberg: Van Der Goot Building
Organizer / Chair: Frans Grijzenhout
Branko Aleksic — Giacomo Casanova sur le marché des arts au 18e siècle
Giacomo Casanova, frère de deux peintres, a entretenu les relations avec plusieurs marchands de l’art en Europe. La recherche des traces de ces liens – correspondance privée de Casanova, contrats et catalogues de vente de l’époque – permettent de cerner la circulation des oeuvres d’art à travers les échanges, achat, etc.
Frans Grijzenhout — Selling the Golden Age: The Rhetoric of Amsterdam Sales Catalogues, 1760–1780
At the apogee of activities on the Amsterdam art market, between 1760–1780, Dutch auctioneers had to compete with their colleagues in Paris, London and elsewhere to appraise their lots. This contribution analyses the rhetoric of Amsterdam auction catalogues as compared to those from Paris.
Everhard Korthals Altes — Caroline Louise von Baden’s Collecting Activities and the Dutch Art Market: The Sale of the Willem Lormier Collection in 1763
In a timespan of only 12 years, between 1761 and 1773, Caroline Louise von Baden acquired 57 paintings on the Dutch art market, which constituted a substantial part of her outstanding art collection. She bought 34 paintings at public sales and another 23 directly from dealers and collectors, using an extensive team of agents, informers and advisors in the Republic, with whom she regularly corresponded and from whom she received auction catalogues. Arguably the most important and largest auction of those days was the sale of Willem Lormier’s collection (1682–1758), which took place in The Hague on 4 July 1763. At the sale, her agent Treuer purchased six paintings for Caroline Louise for a total price of 1,206.10 Dutch guilders. In my lecture I will focus on this spectacular event in order to investigate the supply of paintings from which Caroline Louise could choose, and to find out who her fiercest competitors were during the auction. Comparison to her rivals’ acquisitions will allow us to judge Caroline Louise’s acquisition more accurately. Remarkably, some of the buyers at Lormier’s auction were selling paintings to Caroline Louise occasionally. Even more remarkable is the fact that a number of competitors belonged to the circle of her informers and advisors in the Republic.
Ingrid Vermeulen — Art Brokerage and Knowledge Production: The Dealings of Pieter and Jan Yver in Amsterdam with Carl Heinrich von Heineken in Dresden
Pieter Yver (1712–1787) and his son Jan (1747–1814) were art dealers and brokers in Amsterdam in the second half of the eighteenth century and early years of the nineteenth century. Lugt’s Répertoire online lists no less than 154 auctions entailing some of the most notorious art collections, such as Braamcamp’s. Although the Yvers were dealing in a wide variety of objects ranging from paintings to natural-historical objects, prints held a prominent place within their trade. This is explained not only by Pieter’s original training in the printmaker’s studio of Bernard Picart, but also by Jan’s assembling of an exquisite print collection during his lifetime. Moreover, Pieter was the much-appreciated author of the supplement to Gersaint’s seminal catalogue raisonné of Rembrandt’s prints (1756) which was based on the collection of Pieter Cornelis Baron van Leyden, the later founding collection of the Rijksmuseum Print Room in Amsterdam. In this paper I aim to shed light on the ways in which the international print trade of the Yvers contributed to the production of artistic knowledge, and that about Dutch art in a European context in particular. I will do this by analyzing the as yet unpublished international correspondence of the Yvers with Carl Heinrich von Heineken (1707–1791), which extended from 1768 to 1786. Heineken had been director of the print room of the Saxon rulers in Dresden and had contributed substantially to the acquisitions of their picture gallery. He seems to have initiated lifelong contact with the Yvers when he travelled to the Netherlands in 1768. To him the print trade was instrumental not only in selling and acquiring prints, but largely also in obtaining information about the foremost collectors and artists in the Netherlands. This information was directly processed for his publications on artists, art and print collecting.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
T H U R S D A Y , 3 0 J U L Y 2 0 1 5
Visual Culture in Eighteenth-Century France
S156 / 11:00–12:30, Room: M1-09: Bergen: Van Der Goot Building
Organizer / Chair: Heather McPherson
James Wehn — Printed Designs as Social Currency: The Etching of Juste-Aurèle Meissonnier’s Silver Tureens for the Duke of Kingston
In eighteenth-century France, architects and designers found an alternative market for their decorative designs in the form of reproductive prints, which depicted plans for domestic interiors, furniture, and household items. These prints appealed to members of the aristocracy and the wealthy middle class, whose taste in decorative arts was a matter of social display and closely linked to their roles as voracious consumers of these marketable goods. Inscribed illustrations in books like Jean Mariette’s multiple volume Architecture Françoise (1727–38) listed the designer’s name, specified the building project, and named the patron, thereby elevating the design to a form of social currency tied to celebrity and fashion. Closely related to these book illustrations, prints produced independently by architects and designers served to promote their work with even more immediacy. The royal architect and silversmith, Juste-Aurèle Meissonnier, began working with printmakers early in his career to market his decorative designs, which Gabriel Huquier later combined into a single volume. As a case study, this paper explores an etching by Huquier of Meissonnier’s plan for an elaborate silver centerpiece with two tureens made for the Duke of Kingston around 1735–40. As a document of Meissonnier’s realized designs or an accurate representation of his patron’s commission, the etching lacks verisimilitude. Yet the composition, which cleverly situates the viewer in the imaginative space of a luxurious rococo interior, suggests the etching should be read as an alluring and entertaining advertisement.
Heather McPherson — Celebrity as Currency in Late Eighteenth-Century Portraiture
Through the lens of Jacques-Louis David’s portraits of prominent women from the revolutionary and post-revolutionary era, my paper will examine how female celebrity functioned as artistic currency, contributing to the conflation of public and private identities and shifting semantics of portraiture as a culturally-engaged mode of representation in which fashion, history, and gender coalesced. David’s unfinished Portrait of Juliette Récamier (1800; Musée du Louvre), which helped launch a new portrait type—the reclining woman on a canapé—exemplifies portraiture’s close alignment with fashion and Neoclassical aesthetics. Widely renowned for her beauty and charm and the unadorned simplicity of her dress, Madame Récamier’s complicated public image was an artful construction that arguably left little room for artistic reinvention. As scholars like Mary Vidal and Philippe Bordes have demonstrated, David’s portraits constitute a complex socio-historical chronicle of pre- and post- revolutionary France that blurs traditional distinctions between portrait-painting and history, challenging aesthetic hierarchies. While David’s iconic history paintings have been exhaustively analyzed, his portraits, especially those of women, warrant further attention. There is every reason to believe that he envisaged his portraits as ambitious artistic statements that transcended mere likeness. David was keenly aware of the publicity value of portraiture and the aesthetic and ideological signification of costume. The Neoclassical dress in his female portraits, which was promoted by fashionistas such as Joséphine de Beauharnais and Thérèse Tallien, falls between fashion actualities and the antique ideal, echoing and reinforcing the complex dialogue between nature and artifice, the beau ideal and modern fashion. We know that David intended to exhibit Madame Récamier’s portrait with the recently completed Portrait of Madame de Verninac (1799) at the Salon. Intended to hang in Madame Récamier’s celebrated neo-grec apartments, her portrait would have complemented and competed with the décor and the sitter’s meticulously staged performance before her acolytes.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Travels and Transformations of the Portrait Genre
S163 / 11:00–12:30, Room: T3-16: Mandeville Building
Organizer / chair: Lieke van Deinsen
Milica Cicmil — Portraits of the Poetess from the Academy of Arcadia in Rome
In accordance with the cultural tendencies of Grand Tour, eighteenth-century Rome had many pillars of culture, including the prominent literary Academy of Arcadia, the first Italian academy to admit women. This headquarters of intelect and art was a place where portraits of the most prominent Arcads had been gathered and preserved from the second half of the eighteenth century. Those are not only a visual memory of the poets, but also a testimony of visual identity of the individuals, group and entire cultural institution. The female portraits represent independent professional poetess who contributed to the shaping of Italian Enlightenment. Among them are portraits of Faustina Maratti Zappi (Aglauro Cidonia), Marilli Etrusca, Fidalma Partenide and Giacinta Orsini, made by some of the most important painters of the time, such as Pompeo Batoni and Angelika Kauffmann. Today, some of them are exposed as part of the gallery of portraits in Biblioteca Angelica, the seat of today’s Academy. Others belong to Museum of Rome in Palazzo Braschi. Unfortunately, only a few are exposed to the public.
Isabelle Masse — Mediating through Visual Form: Louis Tocqué’s Queenly Portraits in France, Russia, and Denmark
From 1756 to 1759, the French portraitist Louis Tocqué (1696–1772) undertook a journey that led him to the courts of Saint Petersburg and Copenhagen. In the wake of this journey, the artist left portraits of dignitaries, aristocrats and members of the Russian and Danish royal families, including the formal portraits of Empress Elisabeth of Russia (1758) and Juliane-Marie, Queen of Denmark and Norway (1762). These two monumental compositions are strikingly similar to a portrait of Marie Leszczinska, Queen of France, painted by the artist two decades earlier (1740). Not only do they share most of the codes and conventions characteristic of royal effigies, but more significantly, they replicate the painting’s formal organization. Three highly standardised images of sovereigns thus circulate between the French, Russian and Danish courts. This paper explores the links forged between Tocqué’s portraits, concentrating specifically on the pictures’ visual structure. It focuses on the impact of the cross-European migration of representation modes. Its aim is to rethink the mediating function of portraiture which is commonly associated in the literature with travelling objects. In the case of Tocqué’s paintings, the mediation operates less through the material artworks themselves, which as it happens are difficult to move, than through the dissemination across Europe of a visual and formal composition. In this light, the paper will examine how the three portraits bridge by visual means different political and cultural contexts and how they tend to smooth out the national distinctions between France, Russia and Denmark.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
F R I D A Y , 3 1 J U L Y 2 0 1 5
The International Thread: Lace and Commerce in Eighteenth-Century Europe
S226 / 14:00–15:30, Room: T3-06: Mandeville Building
Organizer / Chair: Michael Yonan, Tara Zanardi
Beth Walsh — Lace as Cultural Currency
Today, lace is often considered merely a frilly accessory, an inconsequential, feminine trimming. In the Europe of the long eighteenth century, however, ubiquitous lace was much more acutely observed and understood. When considering its position in commerce, attention should be given to these wider agencies. Lace was made in great quantities, crossed boundaries, had a part in national and international economics, was legislated for and against. What was it about lace that made it so valuable in so many different ways, not just the financial? This paper investigates the non-monetary ‘value’ of lace – its role as a pan-European cultural currency. It studies, for example, lace as a signifier of cleanliness and morality, as a tricky participant in debates about luxury and religion, as well as a more direct indicator of social status, wealth and fashionable taste. Lace was considered a suitable gift in a variety of circumstances, not just because of its high cost but because of the wider values it held. Its appropriation and display were crucial facets of its agency. These attributes made lace, or its representation, a suitable gift between princes as well as those far below them in social terms.
Elizabeth Davis — Lace, Prints, and the Dissemination of French Fashion
In this paper, I explore the relationship between the development of French lace as a tool for economic growth and the promotion of this luxury product as visualized in late seventeenth-century French fashion prints. Beginning with engravings found in the 1678 issues of the popular journal Le Mercure Galant, I trace the evolution of the imagery as French lace becomes increasingly popular and increasingly available. Over the next two decades, the number of French fashion prints would grow, as would foreign copies of these prints. Dutch printmakers who copied the French prints altered the titles and backgrounds, but the French fashions and French lace were retained. Obviously, these were central to the images’ appeal, even if they now sported a Dutch identity. French fashion prints were also copied by English printmakers, though with fewer changes to the overall imagery. All of these prints expanded the regional exposure of French fashion, and at the same time, much of this imagery depicted large quantities of lace. Questions arise regarding the effectiveness of fashion prints as propaganda for consumption of French fashion goods. With the dissemination of lace fashion information across a broad region, was there an accompanying benefit to the economies of northern French lacemaking regions? These and other issues will be discussed in this talk, which will be supported by illustrations of extant artifacts and artwork from various museum collections.
Carolina Brown Ahlund — Lace, Economy, and National Identity: Lace as a Problem in Eighteenth-Century Sweden
My paper is concerned with the shifting perspectives on lace in Sweden in the eighteenth century, and the various roles lace played in different contexts during the century, involving economical issues as well as questions of national identity. Taking its starting-point in the economical theory and debates in Sweden during the first half of the century, my paper presents the variety of arguments connected to the use and import of lace durig this period. I will also discuss how the arguments against the import of lace, identified as an economic burden to the country, led to the establishment of national production of lace in the mid-century. At this time imported craftsmanship, in the form of skilled lace-makers from Brabant, settled at Drottningholm and in Vadstena in Sweden, in order to train Swedish craftsmen/craftswomen and starting a national production of lace. This import of skilled laborers in order to educate Swedish workers and to start a national production can here be seen as a parallel to the strategy behind the decoration of the new palace in Stockholm, where French painters, sculptors and craftsmen were engaged for the very same reasons.
Tara Zanardi — The Fashioning of the Silk Lace Mantilla: Gender, Labor, and Elite
Consumption In eighteenth-century Spain, lace manufacture occurred outside the strictly guarded and male dominated guilds. Instead, female lace makers coordinated lace production on a semi-professional level set in informal spaces, such as artisanal workshops, which were typically family-operated. Men could participate in different aspects of lace fabrication and retail, but women directed its production, from pattern construction to design execution. Although lace was fabricated for a variety of decorative or sartorial objects, the silk lace known as Blonde (Blonda) was constructed almost exclusively for mantillas, the most archetypal of all Spanish female garb. While Spanish female lace makers produced much of the mantillas for native consumption, they also exported lace veils throughout Europe and to the Americas. In addition, Spanish women purchased both native and foreign laces, pointing to the international market for this textile. Despite the global network of lace and the site of the mantilla’s production, in visual examples, especially portraits of noblewomen, the lace mantilla epitomized a woman’s identity as Spanish. The incorporation of lace mantillas in female elite portraits is significant and relates to broader enlightenment trends of ap¬preciating autochthonous practices and clothing in a highly political climate after the French Revolution and subsequent upheavals. Prior to the 1790s, noblewomen customarily sported European, mostly French, fashions in portraits. The shift to including Spanish objects or the fusion of Spanish and European garments created new styles and indicates the mutability of the mantilla; it embodied both tradition and current fashions. Thus, the mantilla took on more explicit political, social and cultural implications when worn by elite women in portraits. From production to consumption, the Spanish lace mantilla was a loaded garment with direct associations to female labor and female fashionability.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
New Research in the History of the Eighteenth-Century Architecture
S229 / 14:00–15:30, Room: T3-35: Mandeville Building
Laura Facchin — Austrian Lombardy Aristocracy Patronage in the Last Quarter of the Eighteenth Century and the Ferdinand of Habsburg Court Model: Supporters and Critics
The role assumed by Milan as capital of the Habsburg Lombardy and centre of an archducal court in the second half of the eighteenth century determined a new cultural development not only for projecting and building the city and country palaces for archduke Ferdinand of Habsburg and his wife Maria Beatrice of Este, whose artistic and architectural features reflected those adopted in Wien, but also for the creation of a new équipe of court masters, selected among those who had been trained in Rome ‘Capital of the Arts’ to employ them also for the reformation of the artists’ training State institutions. They had to follow the same classicist programs assumed in the Empire capitals academies of Wien and Prague. Milan played a key-role inside the Hapsburg domains to define a Neoclassical language. The foundation of the Brera Academy or the constructions of the Scala Theatre and the Monza villa are just the most famous cases. The Lombard aristocracy adopted on a large scale the new style for remodelling their city palaces, including furniture, frequently in old fashioned Baroque o Rococo style, and country properties, including new English landscape gardens. Their active patronage reflected evidently their political positions on the Habsburg government. Nobles, most of recent nomination, supported completely the court art politics promoted in the country through the efficient action of the prime minister Carlo Gottardo Firmian, art collector and patron himself, in close relationship with staatkanzler Wenzel Anton von Kaunitz-Rietberg in Wien, requiring the same artists, from Piermarini toPollack and the Albertolli family. Others, as the famous Verri brothers, though involved in the Habsburg governance programme, shortly developed critical opinions and preferred to support different, though updated, masters as Cantoni or the Gerli brothers, promoting a vivid competition among artists using even the new means of printed propaganda.
Panu Savolainen — Unveiling the Lost Oeuvre of Architect Christian Friedrich Schröder (1722–1789)
Unrealised designs are relatively common issue in architectural history. On the contrary, lost architectural heritage without original designs or other visual documentary, is ordinarily out of reach of an architectural historian. However, textual documents may occasionally offer a glimpse to lost architectural work that no other material enlightens. The paper at hand is handling the possibilities to trace lost architectural heritage through textual record, namely fire insurance documents and building surveys. My case-study concentrates to the work of a German-Swedish architect Christian Friedrich Schröder (1722–1789). First educated in Stockholm, he was the only eighteenth-century professional architect in present-day area of Finland, and thus extremely influential to the early architectural history of the country. In 1756–1789, he acted as the town architect of Turku, the eighteenth-century capital of Finland, and was a central figure in the planning of several secular and sacral public buildings. Nevertheless, his major work was the manyfold housing of the rapidly growing capital, domestic architecture. Schröder was designing as well noble houses as the new housing of lower classes. Nowadays, Schröder’s work of residential buildings is known solely from noble manors from countryside. The fire of Turku, in 1827, destroyed 75% of the town area, and Schröder’s domestic town architecture went up in smoke, as well as almost all of his blueprints. Only few drawings of the pre-fire town are preserved. In my paper, I illustrate, how textual building surveys and fire policy insurances can be employed to reconstruct the lost town architecture. With the example of Turku and Schröder, I suggest, how the ideals of classisistic domestic houses and interiors reached the remote north of Europe. In general, I propose a method to reconstruct lost architectural heritage through textual record.
New Book | British Silver: State Hermitage Museum Catalogue
Scheduled for October release, from Yale UP:
Marina Lopato, British Silver: State Hermitage Museum Catalogue (London: The Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art, 2015), 400 pages, ISBN: 978-0300213201, $175.
Despite its comparatively small size—just over 370 items, dating mainly from the 18th century—the collection of British silver in the Hermitage is renowned for its variety and quality. Over the course of the 18th and 19th centuries, the introduction of European dining habits and Russian Anglophilia contributed to the acquisition of large quantities of British silver. Most of the pieces were functional rather than decorative, such as dinner or toilet services specially commissioned by members of the imperial family and the aristocracy.
Marking the 250th anniversary of the State Hermitage Museum, this catalogue offers a grand presentation of these glorious silver items, supported by new research and documents. In her introduction, Marina Lopato details the complexities of Russian and Hermitage history to set the scene for the objects. Sumptuous illustrations showcase the exceptional nature of the Hermitage’s British silver, most evident in four monumental wine coolers that are among the best known pieces of British silver anywhere in the world.
Marina Lopato is curator of European silver at the State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg.
Exhibition | The Master Collector: Karoline Luise of Baden
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Now on view in Karlsruhe:
Die Meister-Sammlerin: Karoline Luise von Baden
Staatliche Kunsthalle Karlsruhe, 30 May — 6 September 2015
Karoline Luise of Baden (1723–1783) shaped the art collection of the margraves of Baden more than any other before or since. In 2015 the Staatliche Kunsthalle Karlsruhe is devoting a Great State Exhibition to this passionate art collector. The exhibition coincides with celebrations marking the 300th anniversary of the city of Karlsruhe.
The centrepiece of the show will be the presentation of Karoline Luise’s Mahlerey Cabinet, a collection that once boasted more than 200 paintings, most of which are still preserved in the Kunsthalle today. Her original collection included Dutch masterpieces of the 17th century and great works of French painting from the 18th century, among them canvases by Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn, David Teniers, and Jean Siméon Chardin.
The enterprising Karoline Luise was well-educated and well-versed in a broad range of subjects. She cultivated contacts with many European correspondents, made sure she was well-informed of events beyond her court, and displayed great acuity on the international art market, which was dominated by sensational auctions, just as today. She grew to become a respected connoisseur, a painter in her own right, and finally a ‘master collector’, one of the greatest art collectors of her time.
The 2015 Great State Exhibition will reunite, for the first time, the works once held in the margravine’s Mahlerey cabinet that are now held in the Kunsthalle with works previously owned by Karlsruhe and subsequently sold to museums and private collections in Europe and the United States. The exhibition is underpinned by a major collaborative research Project between the Staatliche Kunsthalle Karlsruhe, Generallandesarchiv Karlsruhe (state archives), and the Università della Svizzera italiana, in Mendrisio, Switzerland. The project has been generously supported by the VolkswagenStiftung. It aims to study the margravine’s extensive legacy of manuscripts and papers, preserved in the family archive of the House of Baden.
Exhibition | Pompeii and Europe, 1748–1943
Now on view in Naples:
Pompeii and Europe, 1748–1943
Museo Archeologico Nazionale Naples, 27 May — 2 November 2015
Curated by Massimo Osanna
Pompeii and Europe recounts the fascination that the archaeological site of Pompeii held for artists and the European imagination, from the start of excavations in 1748 to its dramatic bombing in 1943. The exhibition—devised by Massimo Osanna, the Superintendent for Pompeii, Herculaneum and Stabiae—unfolds along a twofold route at the National Archaeological Museum in Naples and simultaneously at the Amphitheater in Pompeii, and joins the program of events planned for Expo Milano 2015 in importance and prestige.
The exhibition evokes the history of the Vesuvian city, an inexhaustible source of inspiration, in a constant comparison between the arts and the excavations; a dialogue between archaeologists and historians of art, architecture and literature, all called on to recount the unique story of the rediscovery of Pompeii.
Promoted by the Superintendency for Pompeii, Herculaneum and Stabiae and the Directorate General of the Great Pompeii Project, with the National Archaeological Museum in Naples, the exhibition—organized by Electa with an exhibition installation by Francesco Venezia—is structured as a true journey, grand and complex, in which Antiquity enters into a dialogue with Modernity, and nature with the arts and archaeology.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
The catalogue is available in English from Artbooks.com:
Massimo Osanna, et al., Pompei and Europe, 1748–1943 (Milan: Electa, 2015), 350 pages, ISBN: 978-8891803627, $75.
leave a comment