Enfilade

New Appointment for Erika Gaffney

Posted in books, resources by Editor on February 9, 2016

Erika Gaffney Appointed Senior Acquisitions Editor in Early Modern Studies for MIP and Arc Medieval Press

DSC_5133-croppedMedieval Institute Publications (MIP) and Arc Medieval Press, together with its partner, Amsterdam University Press (AUP), are delighted to announce the appointment of Erika Gaffney as Senior Acquisitions Editor in Early Modern Studies. Gaffney established her reputation as an acquisitions editor at Ashgate, where she worked for more than 20 years.

A sample of books on which she worked includes Melissa Hyde and Jennifer Milam, eds., Women, Art and the Politics of Identity in Eighteenth-Century Europe (2003); Daniel Guernsey, The Artist and the State, 1777–1855: The Politics of Universal History in British and French Painting (2007); Carole Paul, The Borghese Collections and the Display of Art in the Age of the Grand Tour (2008); Dorinda Evans, Gilbert Stuart and the Impact of Manic Depression (2013); and Gauvin Alexander Bailey, The Spiritual Rococo (2014).

In terms of future acquisitions, her interests for the early modern period will continue to include eighteenth-century European history and culture through the lens of art history and visual culture. Scholars wishing to renew their working relationship with Erika or new scholars interested in submitting not-yet-contracted volumes (or new series) should email her at erika.gaffney@arc-humanities.org to ask for a Proposal Form.

The Fitzwilliam Turns 200, with Exhibition and Book to Celebrate

Posted in books, exhibitions, museums by Editor on February 9, 2016

VenusCupid

Palma Vecchio, Venus and Cupid, 1523–24 (Cambridge: The Fitzwilliam Museum). The painting was purchased by Lord Fitzwilliam from the London sale of the Duc d’Orléans collection in 1798. He first saw the collection at the Palais Royale during his visits to Paris.

◊  ◊  ◊  ◊  ◊

Press release from The Fitzwilliam:

Today (Thursday, 4 February 2016) one of the great collections of art in the UK celebrates its bicentenary. 200 years to the day of his death, the Fitzwilliam Museum has revealed previously unknown details of the life of its mysterious founder, Richard 7th Viscount Fitzwilliam of Merrion. Research for a new book has shown how his beloved library may have contributed to his death, and how his passion for music led him to the love of his life: a French dancer with whom he had two children, Fitz and Billy.

The Fitzwilliam Museum: A History is written by Lucilla Burn, Assistant Director for Collections at the Fitzwilliam. The book explores the full 200 year story of the Museum and the first chapter focuses on the founder. She comments: “Lord Fitzwilliam’s life has been described as ‘deeply obscure’. Many men of his class and period, who sought neither fame nor notoriety, nor wrote copious letters or diaries, do not leave a conspicuous record. But by going through the archives and letters that relate to him, for the first time we can paint a fuller picture of his history, including aspects of his life that have previously been unknown, even to staff here at the Fitzwilliam.”

Lord Fitzwilliam died on the 4th of February 1816, and founded the Fitzwilliam Museum through the bequest to the University of Cambridge of his splendid collection of art, books and manuscripts, along with £100,000 to build the Museum. This generous gift began the story of one of the finest museums in Britain, which now houses over half a million artworks and antiquities. Other than his close connection to Cambridge and his love of art and books, a motivation for Fitzwilliam’s bequest may have been his lack of legitimate heirs. The new details of his mistress help to explain why he never married.

Joseph Wright, The Hon. Richard Fitzwilliam, 7th Viscount Fitzwilliam of Merrion, 1764 (Cambridge: The Fitzwilliam Museum)

Joseph Wright, The Hon. Richard Fitzwilliam, 7th Viscount Fitzwilliam of Merrion, 1764 (Cambridge: The Fitzwilliam Museum)

In 1761 Richard Fitzwilliam entered Trinity Hall, Cambridge, and in 1763 his Latin ode, ‘Ad Pacem’, was published in a volume of loyal addresses to George III printed by the University of Cambridge. He made a strong impression on his tutor, the fiercely ambitious Samuel Hallifax, who commissioned Joseph Wright of Derby to paint a fine portrait of Fitzwilliam on his graduation with an MA degree in 1764. Fitzwilliam’s studies continued after Cambridge; he travelled widely on the continent, perfecting his harpsichord technique in Paris with Jacques Duphly, an eminent composer, teacher and performer. A number of Fitzwilliam’s own harpsichord compositions have survived, indicating he was a gifted musician.

But from 1784 he was also drawn to Paris by his passionate attachment to Marie Anne Bernard, a dancer at the Opéra whose stage name was Zacharie. With Zacharie, Fitzwilliam fathered three children, two of whom survived infancy—little boys known to their parents as ‘Fitz’ and ‘Billy’. How the love affair ended is unknown, but its fate was clouded, if not doomed, by the French Revolution. We do not know what happened to Zacharie after her last surviving letter, written to Lord Fitzwilliam late in December 1790. Her health was poor, so it is possible that she died in France. However, the elder son, Fitz (Henry Fitzwilliam Bernard), his wife Frances, and their daughter Catherine were living in Richmond with Lord Fitzwilliam at the time of the latter’s death in 1816. It is not known what happened to Billy.

At the age of seventy, early in August 1815, Lord Fitzwilliam fell from a ladder in his library and broke his knee. This accident may have contributed to his death the following spring, and on 18 August that year Fitzwilliam drew up his last will and testament. Over the course of his life he had travelled extensively in Europe. By the time of his death he had amassed around 144 paintings (including masterpieces by Titian, Veronese, and Palma Vecchio), 300 carefully ordered albums of Old Master prints, and a magnificent library containing illuminated manuscripts, musical autographs by Europe’s greatest composers, and 10,000 fine printed books.

His estates were left to his cousin’s son, George Augustus Herbert, eleventh Earl of Pembroke and eighth Earl of Montgomery. But he also carefully provided for his relatives and dearest friends. The family of Fitzwilliam’s illegitimate son, Henry Fitzwilliam Bernard (‘Fitz’)—including Fitz’s wife and daughter—received annuities for life totalling £2,100 a year. On Fitzwilliam’s motivation for leaving all his works of art to the University, he wrote: “And I do hereby declare that the bequests so by me made to the said Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the said University are so made to them for the purpose of promoting the Increase of Learning and the other great objects of that Noble Foundation.”

Director of the Fitzwilliam Museum, Tim Knox commented: “The gift Viscount Fitzwilliam left to the nation was one of the most important of his age. This was the period when public museums were just beginning to emerge. Being a connoisseur of art, books and music, our founder saw the importance of public collections for the benefit of all. But we are also lucky that his life circumstances enabled him to do so—had there been a legitimate heir, he might not have been able to give with such liberality. From the records we have discovered, he appears to have been as generous as he was learned: he arranged music concerts to raise funds for charity and helped many people escaping the bloodiest moments of the French Revolution. We are delighted to commemorate our founder in our bicentenary year.”

◊  ◊  ◊  ◊  ◊

Celebrating the First 200 Years: The Fitzwilliam Museum, 1816–2016
The Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, 4 February — 30 December 2016

Running throughout 2016, this exhibition will explore the Fitzwilliam’s past, present and future. A timeline of the first 200 years will introduce key themes and characters, while displays of objects will show how the collections have developed over two centuries. The exhibition runs alongside a new book The Fitzwilliam Museum: A History. For the very first time, this will tell the full 200 year story of the Museum. The triumphs and challenges of successive Directors, the changing nature of the Museum’s relationship with its parent University, and its dogged survival through the two World Wars. It will also shed light on the colourful, but previously little-known, personal life of Viscount Fitzwilliam himself.

◊  ◊  ◊  ◊  ◊

Lucilla Burn, The Fitzwilliam Museum: A History (London: Philip Wilson Publishers, 2016), 224 pages, ISBN: 978-1781300343, £25.

411xkMs4MaL._SX396_BO1,204,203,200_The Fitzwilliam Museum: A History traces the full story from the Museum’s origins in the 1816 bequest of Richard, 7th Viscount Fitzwilliam of Merrion, up to the present day. It sets the Fitzwilliam’s individual story against the larger context of the growth and development of museums and galleries in the UK and further afield. The text and illustrations draw primarily on the rich and largely unpublished archives of the Fitzwilliam Museum, including the Syndicate Minutes, the reports of University debates published in the Cambridge University Reporter from 1870 onwards, compilations of earlier nineteenth-century documents, architectural plans and drawings, newspaper reports, letters, diaries, exhibition catalogues, photographs and other miscellaneous documents. With this material a substantial proportion of the narrative is told through contemporary voices, not least those of the Museum’s thirteen directors to date, each one a strong and influential character.

Starting with the obscure life of the 7th Viscount and concluding with a portrait of the Museum today, the narrative explores not just the Fitzwilliam’s own establishment and development, but also such wider issues as the changing purpose and character of museums and collections over the last 200 years, and in particular the role of the university museum. Many of the illustrations appear in the book for the first time, and include views of the galleries over the centuries as well as portraits of members of staff.

 

Conference | Chinese Wallpaper: Trade, Technique and Taste

Posted in conferences (to attend) by Editor on February 8, 2016

From the conference website:

Chinese Wallpaper: Trade, Technique and Taste
Coutts & Co / V & A, London, 7–8 April 2016

Detail of the painted wallpaper in the Chinese Bedroom, Belton House. ©National Trust Images/Martin Trelawny

Detail of the painted wallpaper in the Chinese Bedroom, Belton House. ©National Trust Images/Martin Trelawny

A conference on the subject of Chinese wallpaper will take place in London on 7 and 8 April 2016, with an optional excursion to Brighton on 9 April. The event is being organised jointly by the National Trust and the Victoria and Albert Museum, with generous support from Coutts & Co and the Royal College of Art.

Chinese wallpaper is a product that is finely balanced between east and west, art and design, trade and taste. It has been an important component of western interiors for about 250 years, but it has sometimes been taken for granted, literally fading into the background. However, over the last few decades the conservation of Chinese wallpapers has developed considerably. It is now also the subject of increasing scholarly interest. Traditional-style hand-made Chinese wallpaper is still being produced today and is now also in demand in China itself.

The aim of this conference is to stimulate the momentum of the research into Chinese wallpaper and to capture some of the recent findings. The papers to be presented will include European, American and Chinese perspectives and will look at Chinese wallpaper as art, as design, as cross-cultural exchange, as commodity and as material object.

The first day of the conference will be hosted by Coutts at their premises in the Strand—still containing the Chinese wallpaper acquired by banker Thomas Coutts in the late eighteenth century. The second day will be held at the Victoria and Albert Museum and will include the viewing of actual Chinese export wallpapers from the museum’s collection—the largest in the world, but much of it not normally on display. On 9 April there will be an optional excursion to the Royal Pavilion in Brighton, where Chinese wallpaper formed an important component of the Prince Regent’s decorative vision.

◊  ◊  ◊  ◊  ◊

T H U R S D A Y ,  7  A P R I L  2 0 1 6
Coutts & Co.

9:00  Registration and coffee

9:30  Welcome

9:40  Introduction by Margot Finn, Chair in Modern British History, University College London

9:50  Session A
• Emile de Bruijn, ‘Chinese Wallpaper: a Global Product’
• Helen Clifford, ‘From Canton via Custom House to the Country House: Chinese Wallpaper in Transit and the Role of the East India Company, 1750–1850’
• Ming Wilson, ‘Chinese Paper as Commodity’

11:05  Coffee

11:25  Session B
• Xiaoming Wang, ‘Chinese Woodblock New Year Prints and Paintings Used as Wallpaper in Europe in the Eighteenth Century’
• Friederike Wappenschmidt, ‘”Talking Chinese”? Exotic Wall Coverings in German and Austrian Castles’
• Max Tillmann, ‘Chinese Wallpapers and Sensual Exoticism at the Badenburg, Munich’

12:40  Lunch

13:30  Session C
• David Skinner, ‘Using and Marketing “Indian Pictures” in Mid-Eighteenth-Century Dublin’
• Clare Taylor, ‘“A Large Assortment of Curious India Paper”: the Eighteenth-Century English Market for Chinese Wallpaper’
• Patrick Conner, ‘Chinese Wallpaper and Cantonese Export Painting: The Strathallan ‘Drummond’ Wallpaper (Peabody Essex Museum)’

14:45  Tea

15:05  Session D
• Anna Wu, ‘The Chinese Wallpapers at Coutts & Co., London: Mobilising Images of Chinese Life and Industry’
• Sarah Cheang, ‘Red, Black and Gold, and as Glossy as Possible: Modernism, Orientalism, Fashion and Wallpaper’
• Lizzie Deshayes, title TBC [Chinese wallpaper today as produced by Fromental]
• Dominic Evans-Freke, title TBC [Chinese wallpaper today as produced by De Gournay]

F R I D A Y ,  8  A P R I L  2 0 1 6
Victoria and Albert Museum

10:00  Registration and coffee

10:25  Welcome by Anna Jackson, Keeper, Asian Department, Victoria and Albert Museum

10:30  Session E
• Andrew Bush, ‘Early Full-Height Block-Printed Chinese Wallpapers in the United Kingdom’
• Thomas Brain, ‘Observations made during the Conservation Treatment of Chinese Landscape Wallpaper at Oud Amelisweerd’
• T. K. McClintock, ‘Chinese Export Wallcoverings: their Conservation as Western and Asian Works’

11:45  Coffee

12:05  Session F
• Allyson McDermott, ‘The Conservation of Chinese Wallpapers’
• Pauline Webber, ‘The Conservation and restoration of Chinese Wallpapers: an Overview’

13:10  Lunch

14:00 Viewing Sessions
Four sessions for viewing Chinese wallpapers (with change-overs)

17:10  Drinks

S A T U R D A Y ,  9  A P R I L  20 1 6
Royal Pavilion, Brighton

Optional excursion, travel under own steam, meeting at Royal Pavilion entrance at 11:30, where you will be met by curator Alexandra Loske and paper conservator Amy Junker-Heslip.

Abstracts and speakers’ biographies are available here»

Booking information is available here»

 

Colloquium | Le théâtre et la peinture dans les discours Académiques

Posted in conferences (to attend) by Editor on February 7, 2016

From the colloquium programme:

La Vraisemblance ou les enjeux de la représentation: Le théâtre
et la peinture dans les discours Académiques, 1630–1730
Deutsches Forum Für Kunstgeschichte Paris, Hôtel Lully, 9–11 February 2016

Organized by Markus Castor and Kirsten Dickhaut

Epouser son père ; recevoir de la nourriture directement tombée du ciel ou encore vaincre un dragon… Ces récits mythographiques sont-ils encore aujourd’hui les vecteurs d’une quelconque vraisemblance ? Tous les exemples mentionnés – qu’il s’agisse du Cid de Corneille, du tableau de Poussin, du Saint-Michel de Raphaël ou de la tragédie de Médée de Pierre Corneille mise en musique par Marc-Antoine Charpentier semblent aujourd’hui en être totalement dépourvus. Déjà au XVIIe et au XVIIIe siècles, s’imposait la nécessité d’en rappeler les enjeux. La Querelle du Cid, qui agite les débats de l’Académie Française, a des répercussions au sein de l’Académie royale de peinture et de sculpture comme en témoigne ses conférences. Ces sujets doivent faire dorénavant l’objet d’une introduction préalable vis-à-vis du spectateur afin d’établir les supports cognitifs de cette vraisemblance. La vraisemblance constitue – conformément à la poétique aristotélicienne – l’ensemble des moyens rhétoriques qui permettent de représenter de manière crédible un évènement ou une action. Durant l’âge classique, l’exigence de vraisemblance ne prônait déjà plus une stricte application de ces codes. Au cours du XVIIe et du XVIIIe siècle, l’usage normatif de la vraisemblance ne se justifie pas non plus pleinement par le questionnement interprétatif du sujet. Seuls les sujets d’histoire religieuse échappent à cette révision comme en attestent les conférences académiques.

Cette journée d’étude interrogera les stratégies de relecture critique des œuvres théâtrales et artistiques à travers la réception des discours académiques. Ce sera l’occasion d’évaluer l’impact de certaines thèses jésuites et jansénistes sur les modes de représentation rhétoriques de la vraisemblance. Si au cours du XVIIe et du XVIIIe siècles, les normes de la vraisemblance prévalent à celles de la vérité en ce qui concerne les sujets d’histoire religieuse et mythologique, c’est parce qu’elles sont normalisées par un répertoire rhétorique et visuel intelligible par le public. Le principe de fonder ces normes d’après une appréciation rationnelle des faits et de leur déroulement est une conception qui se popularise progressivement tout au long de l’époque moderne. Au cours du XVIIIe siècle, s’opère un basculement entre deux types de vraisemblance: le premier se fonde sur la rhétorique et rejoint l’interprétation sensualiste des dispositifs scéniques et artistiques ; le second s’impose progressivement durant la seconde moitié du XVIIIe siècle et s’inscrit dans l’élaboration d’une perception rationaliste et mathématique de la représentation, pour aboutir à une projection abstraite de l’univers. La question épistémologique de la représentation est en fait la base de la discussion sur la qualité de toute vraisemblance. Dès la seconde moitié du XVIIe siècle, l’Académie royale de peinture et de sculpture à Paris revendique expressément la dimension intellectuelle de sa pratique des arts. Elle s’inspire des modèles des académies littéraires italiennes dans le but de se distinguer du corporatisme des fabriques artistiques. Cette démonstration s’exerce exclusivement par le biais du genre historique et l’élaboration d’une pédagogie de l’art fondée sur la conceptualisation des modèles artistiques. . . .

◊  ◊  ◊  ◊  ◊

M A R D I ,  9  F É V R I E R  2 0 1 6

17:00 Jacqueline Lichtenstein, Université Paris-Sorbonne, Le peintre a-t-il comme le poète, le droit de tout oser? Vérité et vraisemblance dans les conférences académiques

Apéritif

M E R C R E D I ,  1 0  F É V R I E R  2 0 1 6

9:00  Présidence de séance: Kirsten Dickhaut et Markus Castor
• Joachim Küpper, Freie Universität Berlin, Le concept de la vraisemblance chez Aristote
• Andreas Kablitz, Universität zu Köln, À propos de la transformation du concept aristotélicien de la vraisemblance dans la poétologie du XVIIe siècle
• Hannah Williams, Queen Mary University of London, Entre théâtre et académie : l’art religieux dans les églises parisiennes

Pause midi

14:00  Présidence de Séance: Markus Castor et Kirsten Dickhaut
• Florence Ferran, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, La Vraisemblance du théâtre
• Anne-Elisabeth Spica, Université de Metz, Paradoxes et points aveugles du paragone
• Élodie Ripoll, Université Koblenz-Landau, Rougir sur la scène classique. Enjeux scéniques et théoriques
• Christophe Henry, Académie de Versailles, Manières, plasticité, analogies: La vraisemblance académique à l’épreuve des scories ataviques et culturelles
• Kirsten Dickhaut, Université Koblenz-Landau, La vraisemblance merveilleuse – une catégorie chère à Corneille et aux Académiciens

J E U D I ,  1 1  F É V R I E R  2 0 1 6

9:00 Présidence de Séance: Élodie Ripoll et Kirsten Dickhaut
• Susanne Friede, Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt, Les règles de la vraisemblance et du genre : L’art de la représentation dans quelques comédies de Corneille
• Emmanuelle Hénin, Université de Reims, Vraisemblance et illusion : un discours en trompe-l’œil
• Laëtitia Pierre, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne, Tullia ou la violence représentée, 1667–1735
• Markus A. Castor, DFK Paris, La volonté n’est pas toujours la maîtresse de nos productions – La vraisemblance dans le discours académique et dans la pratique artistique, 1667–1740

Pause midi

13:30 Présidence de Séance: Laëtitia Pierre et Élodie Ripoll
• Lauren Cannady, Clark-Institute, Mass., La question de la vraisemblance dans la peinture selon l’abbé Dubos : une reprise de Roger de Piles ?
• Alain Viala, University of Oxford, Il faut bien des bergers, pour la vraisemblance : de Molière à Watteau
• Theodora Psychoyou, Université Paris-Sorbonne, « Représenter en musique » et « bruit poétique » : de quelques paradoxes de la vraisemblance musicale

 

Call for Papers | Books and the City

Posted in Calls for Papers by Editor on February 7, 2016

From H-ArtHist:

Books and the City
Maastricht, Netherlands, 23-24 June 2016

Proposals due by 1 March 2016

This symposium aims to investigate the relationships between books and urban spaces. Cities are complex networks that exist in a constant state of transformation. More than just the built environment of the metropolis, cities are constituted through a range of geographic, social, political and economic dynamics. Drawing together a range of interdisciplinary perspectives, the symposium seeks to investigate the ways in which these aspects of the city have been articulated by books, their production, distribution and collection.

Books and the City poses a number of questions: How has the city been represented in literature, travel guides, artists’ books, newspapers, prints, graphic novels or zines? How has the book been used to reflect, challenge or produce urban identities? To what extent is the book implicated in strategies of mapping, defining borders and city limits or articulating boundaries between the urban and suburban? What role have books played in constructing narratives about the history, memory or future transformations of the city? How do book collections, publishers and systems of distribution relate to notions of civic identity? How might the materiality of books and their preservation reveal the structures or concerns of city spaces and their communities? Papers exploring these questions and others are invited from artists, academics and professionals working across periods and geographies.

The symposium will be organized around sessions on
• Book history
• Artist’s books
• Representations of the city
• Travel
• Urban centers (London, Paris, etc.)
• Conceptions of space and time
• Books and city networks
• Circulation of books and reading practices in the city

These session themes are suggestions and are not an exhaustive list. The Books and the City symposium coincides with the Netherlands 2016 Year of the Book. Abstracts of 300 words (max) along with a short bio should be submitted to barbara.garrie@canterbury.ac.nz, p.fleskens@maastrichtuniversity and emilie.sitzia@maastrichtuniversity.nl by 1 March 2016. Panel proposals will also be considered.

New Book | Young Mr. Turner: The First Forty Years, 1775–1815

Posted in books by Caitlin Smits on February 6, 2016

From Yale UP:

Eric Shanes, Young Mr. Turner: The First Forty Years, 1775–1815 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016), 552 pages, ISBN: 978-0300140651, $150.

young-mr-turnerA complex figure, and divisive during his lifetime, Joseph Mallord William Turner (1775–1851) has long been considered Britain’s greatest painter. An artist of phenomenal invention, complexity, and industry, Turner is now one of the world’s most popular painters. This comprehensive new account of his early life draws together recent scholarship, corrects errors in the existing literature, and presents a wealth of new findings. In doing so, it furnishes a more detailed understanding than ever before of the connections between Turner’s life and art.

Taking a strictly chronological approach, Eric Shanes addresses Turner’s intellectual complexity and depth, his technical virtuosity, his personal contradictions, and his intricate social and cultural relations. Shanes draws on decades of familiarity with his subject, as well as newly discovered source material, such as the artist’s principal bank records, which shed significant light on his patronage and sales. The result, written in a warm, engaging style, is a comprehensive and magnificently illustrated volume which will fundamentally shape the future of Turner studies.

Eric Shanes is a professional painter, independent art historian, and lecturer. He is a leading expert on Turner, a vice president of the Turner Society, and the author of many books on the artist, including Turner’s England (1990) and Turner’s Watercolour Explorations (1997).

New Book | China and the Church: Chinoiserie in Global Context

Posted in books by Editor on February 5, 2016

From the University of California Press:

Christopher M. S. Johns, China and the Church: Chinoiserie in Global Context, Franklin D. Murphy Lectures (Los Angeses: University of California Press, 2016), 206 pages, ISBN: 978-0520284654, $50 / £35.

9780520284654This groundbreaking study examines decorative Chinese works of art and visual culture, known as chinoiserie, in the context of church and state politics, with a particular focus on the Catholic missions’ impact on Western attitudes toward China and the Chinese. Art-historical examinations of chinoiserie have largely ignored the role of the Church and its conversion efforts in Asia. Johns, however, demonstrates that the emperor’s 1722 prohibition against Catholic evangelization, which occurred after almost a century and a half of tolerance, prompted a remarkable change in European visualizations of China in Roman Catholic countries. China and the Church considers the progress of Christianity in China during the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, examines authentic works of Chinese art available to the European artists who produced chinoiserie, and explains how the East Asian male body in Western art changed from ‘normative’ depictions to whimsical, feminized grotesques after the collapse of the missionary efforts during the 1720s.

Christopher M. S. Johns is Norman and Roselea Goldberg Professor of History of Art at Vanderbilt University. He is author of Papal Art and Cultural Politics: Rome in the Age of Clement XI, Antonio Canova and the Politics of Patronage in Revolutionary and Napoleonic Europe, and The Visual Culture of Catholic Enlightenment.

Call for Papers | The Royal Palace in the Europe of Revolutions

Posted in Calls for Papers by Editor on February 5, 2016

The Royal Palace in the Europe of Revolutions, 1750–1850
Centre André Chastel, Paris, 28–29 October 2016

Proposals due by 1 May 2016

Organized by Basile Baudez and Adrián Almoguera

Since the publication of Nikolaus Pevsner’s History of Building Types in 1976, architectural historians have been alert to the importance of typologies for rethinking their discipline. As analyzed by Werner Szambien or Jacques Lucan, thinking through types allowed for the articulation of concepts of convenance, character and composition in both public and private commissions. Along with metropolitan churches and royal basilicas, in ancien régime Europe princely palaces represented the most prestigious program an architect could expect. For a period in which the divine right of kings was being called into question, however, what happened to the physical structures of royal or princely power, symbol of political authority and dynastic seats? Did the national models of the Escorial, Versailles, Het Loo or Saint James palaces still hold, even in light of new models made available through the publication of archeological discoveries in Rome or Split? The second half of the eighteenth and first half of the nineteenth century represent a moment of intense construction or reconstruction of the principal European palaces, from Caserta to Buckingham Palace, Saint-Petersburg to Lisbon, Versailles to Coblenz. This trend, addressed by Percier and Fontaine in their Résidences des souverains de France, d’Allemagne, de Russie, etc. (1833), took place in a Europe that was undergoing political developments that altogether changed the nature and symbolic structure of princely power.

This symposium, focused on Europe from roughly 1750 to 1850, aims to interrogate the manner in which architects and their patrons integrated the changing concepts of character in architecture and symbolic place of dynastic palaces, reconciling them with theory and/or practice through rethinking issues of distribution, construction, environmental situation, décor, function, reuse of interpretations of printed or drawn sources.

Submissions of 500 words (maximum) should be sent before May 1, 2016 to basile.baudez@gmail.com and af.almoguera@gmail.com.

Call for Papers | The Medium and the Message: European Architecture

Posted in Calls for Papers by Editor on February 4, 2016

From the University of Birmingham:

The Medium and the Message: Re-evaluating Form and
Meaning in European Architecture, 1400–1950

Barber Institute of Fine Arts, Birmingham, 1–2 July 2016

Proposals due by 1 April 2016

All buildings—whether polite, vernacular or somewhere in between—were initially informed by some kind of presiding idea or set of ideas. Some of these ideas presumed an audience (and are therefore part of the building’s rhetoric and essential to its intended ‘meaning’), while others did not (in being part, for example, of a production process, or allied with social and cultural contexts, and no more than that). All such ideas should concern the architectural historian, but the most engaging and historically resonant may well belong to the first category and also be ones that can be inferred and recovered from the buildings themselves. The architectural historian may also profit from a keener understanding of how the ideas initially underpinning a building may, in time, have become modified, or even eclipsed by associations of very different kinds.

The conference will investigate the ways in which ideas are conveyed by the physical and visual medium of architectural form. It will include case studies which will move us beyond explanations of architecture that borrow too liberally from literature and theory, and will thereby deepen our understanding both of the medium of architecture and of the construction and operation of architectural ‘meaning’. Moreover, by establishing or re-exploring the intellectual foundations sustaining the designs of certain key buildings, and by examining the ways in which they informed the physical realities of the buildings themselves, we hope to reinvigorate and enrich our understanding of significant moments in European architectural history.

We welcome papers that directly explore the relationship between message and medium through detailed historical case studies which directly address the agency of architecture itself in the conveying of meaning.  Papers could tackle, for example, Filippo Brunelleschi’s innovative ‘Renaissance’ style of architecture; Inigo Jones’s Italianate classicism; Francesco Borromini’s departures from classical proprieties; complex stereotomy in French architecture of the early modern period; the new language and meanings of English Palladianism; the rarefied classicism of John Soane or Karl Friedrich Schinkel; form and association in the concrete architecture of Le Corbusier. In general, therefore, they will examine architecture’s expressive potential, through such topics as the materiality of buildings, the visual logic and implications of built form or the evocation (or not) of the historical past, and in relation to particular people, periods and places.

Papers should be of 20 minutes in length (followed by 5 or 10 minutes of questions). If you wish to apply, please write to Professor Anthony Geraghty (anthony.geraghty@york.ac.uk with the subject line Medium and Message), giving the subject and a brief synopsis (250 words) of your proposed topic. Please also specify your title and full name and your institutional affiliation (if any). The deadline for the submission of proposals is 1 April 2016, and we aim to have a decision on the acceptance of papers within 4 weeks of that date.

Convenors
David Hemsoll (University of Birmingham)
Anthony Geraghty (University of York)

Exhibition | The Lavish Prince Regent

Posted in exhibitions by Caitlin Smits on February 4, 2016

From the MFAH:

The Lavish Prince Regent
Rienzi, The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, 5 March — 30 July 2016

05f148df0af7aac8635f9c6b2abfc048

Henry Bone, King George IV, 1821, enamel on gold, 9k rose gold, embossed metallic foil, and glass (Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, Rienzi Collection)

Prior to his accession to the British throne in 1821, King George IV served as Prince Regent of the nation during the mental illness and incapacitation of his father, George III.  Before and during his regency, the prince led an extravagant lifestyle that held great sway over the fashions of the day, which saw him advocating new forms of leisure, style, and taste.

During this period, he built the famous Royal Pavilion in Brighton, which was an Orientalist fantasy in architecture. As with the pavilion, the ‘Regency Style’ that the prince created was a mixture of the Antique and the exotic, the gilded and the decorated—and with an interest in elegant innovation. This exhibition presents a survey of this most sumptuous of historical styles