Lecture | Mark Purcell on the Country House Library
Booking information is available through Eventbrite:
Mark Purcell | The Country House Library
Art Workers’ Guild, London, 10 April 2018
The Society for the History of Collecting are delighted to announce their next event which sees Mark Purcell discusses his new book The Country House Library.
Country Houses are normally studied by art, architectural, and social historians for the prosopography of their ownership, the details of the house, the modifications and motivations thereof, and the chattels (art and furnishings). However, when it comes to the actual contents of the library, often considered the most important room in house, the books themselves are overlooked. This is perhaps due to a general and historic lack of understanding of the history of the book, although the value of the books could equal that of the rest of the chattels in a house. Mark Purcell has remedied this oversight in his majestic survey of country house libraries, those that are and even those that once were but have been dispersed. Mark demonstrates that the country house libraries were not standard appendages, underappreciated and under read by their owners, but that they encompassed a vast range of form and function. His immensely successful book will be a sourcebook for art historians and those interested in the history of collections for decades to come.
Tuesday, 10 April, 6:00pm, Art Workers’ Guild, 6 Queen Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1N 3AT. The lecture will be followed by drinks. Please book as soon as possible as places are limited.
Mark Purcell is Deputy Director, Research Collections, University of Cambridge, University Library. Formerly he was responsible for all the libraries within the National Trust (1999–2015) that comprise much beyond the country house, ranging from vernacular buildings to industrial in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Mark has studied the NT collections and has published numerous gems within. Responsible for a thorough cataloging of that vast corpus, he is perhaps the world’s expert on libraries once privately held in the UK.
Journée d’études | Représenter le conflit et le désordre au XVIIIe siècle

Jan van Huchtenburg, La Bataille de Ramilies entre Français et Anglais le 23 mai 1706, 1706–33, 116 × 153 cm
(Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum)
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
As noted at Groupe de Recherche en Histoire de l’Art Moderne (GRHAM). . .
Représenter le conflit et le désordre au XVIIIe siècle (1715–1799)
Institut national d’histoire de l’art (INHA), Paris, 13 April 2018
Cette journée d’étude est consacrée au thème du conflit au XVIIIe siècle, et plus particulièrement sur ses représentations, ses significations et les manières de le mettre en scène. La borne chronologique choisie inclut tous les supports visuels (gravure, peinture, sculpture, architecture) afin de voir comment, mises en synergie, les différentes formes d’art expriment, de façon plus ou moins évidente, la notion de conflit, de trouble et de désordre.
Comment figure-t-on le conflit ou l’idée de conflit au XVIIIe siècle ? Quelles sont les ruptures visuelles éventuelles avec le XVIIe siècle ? La Révolution française semble résumer le XVIIIe siècle or, pendant toute la première partie du règne, il existe des conflits religieux, militaires ainsi que des troubles liés à la politique intérieure. C’est aussi l’époque où l’aspect scientifique et les sciences naturelles font l’objet de nombreuses représentations. Ainsi, on s’aperçoit que la nature et ce qui l’environne, peut faire écho à l’idée de désordre (peinture de paysage, grandes fêtes révolutionnaires…). Il serait donc intéressant de mettre en valeur l’aspect technique : existe-t-il une technique propre à la représentation du conflit ? Quels liens entre technique et expression picturale pouvons-nous établir dans ces représentations de conflits ? Enfin, au-delà d’un désordre dans l’espace public, il serait également intéressant de traiter l’aspect conflictuel au sein de l’espace privé, dont l’intimité des familles entre en résonance avec l’essor de la bourgeoisie au XVIIIe siècle.
Comité organisateur: Lucille Calderini (Paris 1/INHA), Bastien Coulon (Paris 1) et Charlot te Rousset (Lille 3).
P R O G R A M M E
9.45 Accueil des participants
10.00 Introduction, Etienne Jollet et Lucille Calderini
10.30 Conflit et Animalité
• Loreline Pelletier (Doctorante, Université Lille 3), Comme chien et chat: Représenter le conflit animal dans la peinture du XVIIIe siècle
• Lydia Vazquez (Professeure, Université du Pays Basque, UPV/EHU) et Juan Manuel Ibeas Altamira (Professeur Adjoint, Université du Pays Basque, UPV/EHU), Le monde à l’envers chez Goya: Pouvoir féminin, puissance animale
• Chloé Perrot (Doctorante, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), Fouler le joug rompu, représenter des actes d’insurrection dans l’Iconologie par figures (v. 1795)
12.15 Discussion et déjeuner
14.30 Conflit et Royauté
• Clara Auger (Doctorante, Université Rennes 2), Portraits et représentations allégoriques de Philippe V d’Espagne: Une interprétation française du triomphe royal ?
• Charlotte Rousset (Doctorante, Université Lille 3), Les victoires militaires de Louis XV dans ses médailles: Justifier la guerre au nom de la paix
15.30 Pause
15.45 Conflit et Politique
• Camilla Murgia (Professeure, EPSU et Université de Genève), Représenter la guerre, fabriquer la paix: Les éventails de la période révolutionnaire et du Directoire
• Bastien Coulon (Doctorant, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), Le désordre et la paix: La peinture d’histoire en France à l’épreuve du Traité de Paris (1763)
16.45 Discussions et conclusion de la journée
Exhibition | Black Out: Silhouettes Then and Now
From the National Portrait Gallery:
Black Out: Silhouettes Then and Now
Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery, Washington, D.C., 11 May 2018 — 10 March 2019
Mississippi Museum of Art, Jackson, 27 April — 25 August 2019
Curated by Asma Naeem
Silhouettes—cut paper profiles—were a hugely popular and democratic form of portraiture in the 19th century, offering virtually instantaneous likenesses of everyone from presidents to those who were enslaved. The exhibition Black Out: Silhouettes Then and Now explores this relatively unstudied art form by examining its rich historical roots and considering its forceful contemporary presence. The show features works from the Portrait Gallery’s extensive collection of silhouettes, such as those by Auguste Edouart, who captured the likenesses of such notable figures as John Quincy Adams and Lydia Maria Child, and at the same time, the exhibition reveals how contemporary artists are reimagining silhouettes in bold and unforgettable ways.
Highlights of the historical objects include a double-silhouette portrait of a same-sex couple and a rarely seen life-size silhouette of a nineteen-year-old enslaved girl, along with the bill of her sale from 1796. The featured contemporary artists are Kara Walker, who makes panoramic silhouettes of plantation life and African American history; Canadian artist Kristi Malakoff, who cuts paper to make life-size sculptures depicting a children’s Maypole dance; MacArthur-prize-winner Camille Utterback, who will present an interactive digital work that reacts to visitors’ shadows and movements; and Kumi Yamashita, who ‘sculpts’ light and shadow with objects to create mixed-media profiles of people who are not there. With both historical and contemporary explorations into the silhouette, Black Out reveals new pathways between our past and present, particularly with regard to how we can reassess notions of race, power, individualism, and even, our digital selves.
This exhibition is curated by Portrait Gallery Curator of Prints, Drawings and Media Arts, Asma Naeem.
Asma Naeem, Black Out: Silhouettes Then and Now (Princeton University Press, 2018), 192 pages, ISBN: 978 0691180588, $45.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Note (added 27 April 2019) — The posting was updated to include the Mississippi Museum of Art as a second venue.
Artists in Paris: Mapping the 18th-Century Art World

Results for a search for ‘Hubert Robert’; screen shot from Hannah Williams and Chris Sparks, Artists in Paris: Mapping the 18th-Century Art World, www.artistsinparis.org (accessed 2 April 2018). As noted in the FAQs for the site, “there are 10,915 addresses in the database,” with coverage for “a total of 471 artists,” that is, for “every artist admitted to the Academy between 1675 and 1793.” Useful site details are available with the ‘settings’ tab.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
From the ‘About’ page of Artists in Paris:
Artists in Paris: Mapping the 18th-Century Art World
Artists in Paris is an open-access digital art history project funded by The Leverhulme Trust and supported by Queen Mary University of London. The Principal Investigator of the project is Dr Hannah Williams. The website was designed and built by Dr Chris Sparks.
Introduction
Paris is a city renowned for its artistic communities. Neighbourhoods like Montmartre and Montparnasse in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries are familiar spaces of artistic activity and sociability. But when it comes to earlier generations of artists, we know strikingly little about how they inhabited the city.
Where did the artists of eighteenth-century Paris live? Which artists were neighbours? What sub-communities formed within the city? Which neighbourhoods formed the cultural geography of the eighteenth-century art world? And did that geography change over the course of the century?
This website provides answers to these tantalising questions about the geography and demography of the Paris art world in the eighteenth century. Based on original archival research retrieving the addresses of hundreds of artists’ homes and studios, this website uses digital mapping technologies to locate those spaces on georeferenced historical maps, making them available for visitors to explore.
Significance
Artists in Paris is the first project to map comprehensively where artistic communities developed in the eighteenth-century city and offers rich scope for subsequent investigations into how these communities worked and the impact they had on art practice in the period. Yielding crucial new information and harnessing the exciting possibilities of digital humanities for art-historical research, this website is intended as a valuable resource for anyone studying or researching French art, or for anyone with an interest in the history of Paris.
With its two modes—Year and Artist—the website accommodates searches either by date or by person. For instance, visitors can explore where every artist was living at certain moments in time, or they can select individual artists and explore all the addresses lived at across their careers. Designed to be simultaneously inviting and informative, these interactive data-enriched maps answer many questions about the Paris art world. But they are also intended as an empirical base upon which to pose new kinds of inquiries, inspiring continued explorations into networks of artistic sociability, the role of the city in art production, the geography of the art world, and urban experience more generally.
Credits & Acknowledgements
Artists in Paris has been funded through a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Research Fellowship, awarded to Hannah Williams and held at Queen Mary University of London (2015–2018). Additional support for the project has been provided by Queen Mary University of London. Preliminary stages of the research were funded by a grant from the University of Oxford’s John Fell Fund, awarded to Hannah Williams, and undertaken at the University of Oxford (2013–2015).
Thanks are due to the many people who offered advice and suggestions, attended research seminars, workshops, and usability testing sessions, and provided feedback and encouragement throughout the project. Among the many are Laura Auricchio, Robin Carlyle, Craig Clunas, Rebecca Emmett, Noémie Étienne, Keren Hammerschlag, Colin Jones, Meredith Martin, Gay McAuley, Chris Moffatt, David Pullins, Helen Stark, Chloe Ward, Sam Williams, Emma Yates, the community of developers on Stack Overflow, students at Queen Mary University of London and the University of London in Paris, and attendees of presentations at the Institute of Historical Research in London, the Deutsches Forum für Kunstgeschichte in Paris, University of Birmingham, University of St Andrews, and the National Gallery of Art in Canberra.
Special thanks are due to Dr Mia Ridge (British Library) for advice and technical support from the project’s inception and throughout its development.
The website logo and colour-design are by Jason Varone.
This website was built using OpenLayers and Bootstrap. It also makes use of other great libraries including Handelbars. The historical maps were georeferenced using Map Warper. The greyscale contemporary map layer is by Stamen Design, licensed under CC BY 3.0. Map data is by OpenStreetMap under ODbL. The digitized historical maps of Paris have been sourced from Wikimedia Commons.
New Book | Commedia dell’Arte in Context
From Cambridge UP:
Christopher Balme, Piermario Vescovo, and Daniele Vianello, eds., Commedia dell’Arte in Context (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018), 377 pages, ISBN: 9781139236331, $120.
The commedia dell’arte, the improvised Italian theatre that dominated the European stage from 1550 to 1750, is arguably the most famous theatre tradition to emerge from Europe in the early modern period. Its celebrated masks have come to symbolize theatre itself and have become part of the European cultural imagination. Over the past twenty years a revolution in commedia dell’arte scholarship has taken place, generated mainly by a number of distinguished Italian scholars. Their work, in which they have radically separated out the myth from the history of the phenomenon remains, however, largely untranslated into English (or any other language). The present volume gathers together these Italian and English-speaking scholars to synthesize for the first time this research for both specialist and non-specialist readers. The book is structured around key topics that span both the early modern period and the twentieth-century reinvention of the commedia dell’arte.
Exhibition | Blondel, Architecte des Lumières
Opening next month in Metz:
Blondel, Architecte des Lumières
Galerie de l’Arsenal, Metz, 12 April — 13 July 2018
Architecte parisien, académicien, professeur royal, Jacques-François Blondel (1705–1774) vint à Metz en 1761. Il est chargé par le Maréchal d’Estrées d’aménager les places autour de la Cathédrale Saint-Étienne. Son projet, réalisé quelques années plus tard, constitue l’un des meilleurs ensembles urbains du xviiie siècle. En effet, avant tout théoricien, ses constructions sont rares et précieuses. Son chef-d’oeuvre est incontestablement l’aménagement de la Place d’Armes à Metz qui se situe dans la lignée de ses prestigieuses consoeurs parisiennes, que sont Vendôme ou Concorde. Cette exposition inédite, accompagnant la candidature de « Metz royale et impériale » sur la liste du patrimoine mondial, propose de faire découvrir à travers le projet messin les talents multiples de Jacques-François Blondel, collaborateur de l’Encyclopédie de Diderot et d’Alembert, auteur prolifique, créateur de décors éphémères, concepteurs de nombreux projets et surtout professeur qui forma toute une génération d’architectes européens et dont la méthode d’enseignement servira de fondement au système actuel d’apprentissage de l’architecture.
Une production de la Ville de Metz en partenariat avec la Cité de l’Architecture et du Patrimoine de Paris, l’École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Nancy et la Cité musicale-Metz.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
More information about Metz’s UNESCO application is available here:
The National Committee of French World Heritage Properties, meeting on January 9, 2009, issued a favorable opinion about the inclusion of Metz on the French tentative list. This is only a first step, but it is essential. The city is eligible for inclusion on the UNESCO World Heritage List. Metz has accumulated an incredible architectural and urban heritage over time. Under the label “Royal and imperial Metz,” the application aims at recognizing the unusual urban adventure that took place in the Messin city from the second half of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century, before, during and after the German annexation [in 1871].
Exhibition | Architecture et Pouvoir

In 1903 Paul Tornow’s neo-Gothic portal for the Cathedral of Metz replaced the classical portal designed by Jacques-François Blondel, which dated to 1764.
◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
From Cité de l’architecture et du patrimoine:
Architecture et Pouvoir: Un Portail pour la Cathédrale de Metz
Cité de l’architecture et du patrimoine, Paris, 28 March — September 2018
Curated by Aurélien Davrius
En parallèle de l’exposition Blondel, architecte des Lumières présentée à Metz, du 12 avril au 13 juillet 2018, le musée des Monuments français, en partenariat avec la Ville de Metz et l’École nationale supérieure d’architecture de Nancy, propose une exposition-dossier consacrée à la singulière fortune du portail de la cathédrale de Metz.
Le portail élevé en 1764 par Jacques-François Blondel est remplacé par le portail néo-gothique que nous connaissons aujourd’hui, inauguré en 1903. Les photographies et documents rassemblés dans l’exposition retracent l’histoire de cette transformation ; ils soulignent aussi la manière dont les deux portails ont chacun servi de support à la manifestation et à l’expression du pouvoir politique. Le roi Louis XV tout d’abord, à qui l’œuvre de Jacques-François Blondel rendait hommage ; Guillaume II ensuite, kaiser du Second Reich immortalisé sous le traits du prophète Daniel sur le portail néo-gothique conçu par son architecte, Paul Tornow (1848–1921).
La massivité et la dissonance du vocabulaire classique du portique élevé par Jacques-François Blondel avec le style gothique de la cathédrale, maintes fois décriées dès le début du XIXe siècle, ont certainement contribué à cette métamorphose. Cependant, dans le contexte de l’annexion de l’Alsace-Moselle par la Prusse, son démantèlement au profit du portail néo-gothique de Paul Tornow invite aussi à interroger la portée politique du geste architectural : entre francisation et germanisation d’un territoire, le nouveau pouvoir n’a-t-il pas tenté de faire disparaître les traces d’un certain passé pour inscrire sa propre histoire ?
Stephanie Wiles Named Director of the Yale Art Gallery
Press release (28 March 2018) from Yale:

Stephanie Wiles (Photo by Jon Reis Photography).
Stephanie Wiles, currently the Richard J. Schwartz Director of the Herbert F. Johnson Museum of Art at Cornell University, will serve as the next Henry J. Heinz II Director of the Yale University Art Gallery, announced President Peter Salovey. Her appointment will begin July 1.
“I am thrilled to announce the appointment of Stephanie Wiles,” Salovey said. “She is an inspiring leader who is excited by the power of art to help us make connections and spark new ideas. I know she will steward the gallery—one of Yale’s finest treasures—while, together with other arts leaders on campus, envisioning new possibilities for the arts at our university.”
Wiles comes to Yale with over 20 years of experience leading college and university art museums. In her prior roles, Wiles has led efforts to connect the visual arts to other areas of university life by developing interdisciplinary courses, reimagining gallery spaces to be more inviting to visitors from campus and beyond, and spearheading exhibitions and publications to showcase research. She served on several committees at Cornell Tech, a science and technology graduate school in New York City, tasked with bringing art to the campus and into the curriculum. Wiles has successfully created educational and research opportunities across disciplines that take advantage of museum collections. She secured funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation to develop eight semester-long courses that bridged the arts, humanities, science, and engineering.
At Cornell, Ms. Wiles oversaw the negotiation and completion of Cosmos, a site-specific light sculpture by Leo Villareal ’90 comprising 12,000 LED lights. The work, named in honor of scientist Carl Sagan and visible across campus and from many parts of Ithaca, is a beacon attracting visitors to the museum.
“Stephanie shares my commitment to connecting the arts to everything we do at Yale,” Salovey said. “The arts can bring us together, inspiring us to see ourselves and the world with new eyes. As we continue to foster an even more unified Yale, we are imagining new ways to connect the gallery’s magnificent resources to education, research, preservation, and practice. I am confident Stephanie will guide these efforts with enormous wisdom, creativity, and vision.”
Wiles began her career in the department of drawings and prints at the Morgan Library & Museum in New York City; she later assumed leadership positions at Wesleyan University, Oberlin College, and, most recently, Cornell. Wiles received her bachelor’s degree from Hobart and William Smith Colleges, a master’s degree in art history from Hunter College of the City University of New York, and a Ph.D. in art history from the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. Her dissertation surveys the careers of British-born artists Thomas Charles Farrer, a Ruskin admirer and leader of the American Pre-Raphaelites, and his brother Henry Farrer.
In making the announcement, Salovey expressed his deep appreciation to members of the search committee: Mary Miller (committee chair), Sterling Professor of History of Art and senior director of the Institute for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage; Emily Bakemeier, deputy provost and dean of faculty affairs of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences; Tim Barringer, the Paul Mellon Professor in the History of Art and chair of the Department of the History of Art; Deborah Berke, dean of the Yale School of Architecture; Susan Gibbons, the Stephen F. Gates ’68 University Librarian and deputy provost for collections and scholarly communication; Daniel Harrison, the Allen Forte Professor of Music Theory; Roger Horchow ’50, a member of the Yale University Art Gallery Advisory Board; Ian McClure, the Susan Morse Hilles Chief Conservator of the Yale University Art Gallery; and John Walsh ’61, a member of the Yale University Art Gallery Advisory Board and director emeritus of the J. Paul Getty Museum.
Salovey praised the tenure of Jock Reynolds, who will step down as director on June 30, noting that he had led the Yale University Art Gallery “with distinction, energy, and originality for 20 years.”
Conference | Fashioning the Early Modern Courtier, 1550–1750

From the conference website:
Fashioning the Early Modern Courtier, 1550–1750
St John’s College Cambridge, 16 May 2018
This one-day conference will explore the ways in which clothing contributed to the gendered (self)fashioning of the courtier in early modern Europe (ca. 1550–1750), examining both its symbolic significance and its action on and interaction with the body.
Recent historical research has emphasised how early modern courts were crucial sites for the elaboration and diffusion of specific corporeal models aspiring to shape the ideal man and woman. Fashion, then as now, provides a very material setting that has the power to promote specific patterns of thought and action.
Our speakers will explore how male and female courtiers skilfully constructed their identity and negotiated their social status through sartorial trends and beautification techniques. Rooted within a broader culture of corporeal interpretation, fashion represented an effective way of asserting political allegiance and even expressing criticism ad hominem. Sovereigns could assert their power by clothing the royal entourage and enforcing vestiary policies. Courtiers in turn could play a role in shaping the image and body of the monarch through gift-giving.
Embracing a corporealist perspective, we endeavour to integrate a semiotic reading of dress with accounts of its fundamentally embodied nature, both in its creation and in its wearing. Symbolic sartorial practices engaged directly with the material body, re-shaping and de-forming the silhouette. Clothes and accessories could provide support and protection, whilst sometimes constituting a hindrance to even the simplest of movements.
We will also investigate the diffusion of new fashions, materials, and techniques. Circulation patterns within the court will be analysed alongside interactions with the city and mutual influences between international centres of power. We will reconstruct the complex network of tailors, craftsmen and merchants which orbited around the court, moving across all social classes and providing a key point of connection between aristocratic courtiers and urban bourgeoisie. We will also consider alternative dissemination mediums such as portraits, early examples of single-leaf broadsheets and bound books displaying fashion plates.
Gathering an international group of speakers including fashion curators, makers, and academics from a variety of fields, the aim of our conference is to challenge traditional top-down models of fashion circulation as well as provide a more nuanced and complete narrative bringing into play all the different actors involved. We also seek to demonstrate how a study of the clothed body provides a privileged gateway into the world of court politics and a unique opportunity to access the courtiers’ embodied experiences.
Registration details are available here»
P R O G R A M M E
9:15 Registration
9:45 Welcome Address
10:00 Panel 1
• Mark De Vitis (University of Sydney), The Fashioned Body as Materialised Critique at the Court of Louis XIV
• Jemma Field (Brunel University London), Between Scotland and England: The Journey of Elite Female Fashion in 1603
• Catherine Stearn (Eastern Kentucky University), She-Wolves in Queen’s Clothing: Exploring the Relationship between Dress, Female Courtiers and Monarchical Authority at the Court of Elizabeth I
11:15 Coffee and tea
11:30 Panel 2A
• Natasha Awais-Dean (King’s College London), Three Houres a Buttoning: Embellishing Male Dress in Early Modern England
• Sarah Crowe (Goethe University & Staedel School, Frankfurt), The Semiology of the Ruff in the Early Dutch Golden Age to 1648
• Jane Partner (University of Cambridge), Reading the Early Modern Body: The Case Study of Textual Jewellery
11:30 Panel 2B
• Lacy Gillette (Florida State University), Cataloguing the Character of Couture: An Examination of Jost Amman’s Sixteenth-Century Printed Costumes
• Abigail Gomulkiewicz (University of Cambridge), From Subject to Monarch: Male Gift-Giving at the Court of Elizabeth I
• Juliet Claxton (King’s College London), ‘His Wife Was the Rich China-Woman That the Courtiers Visited So Often’: The Role of the Merchant at the Stuart Court
12:45 Lunch
13:30 Keynote Address
• Evelyn Welch (King’s College London)
14:45 Panel 3A
• Rebecca Morrison (QMUL and the V&A), The Diplomacy of the Dress Fitting: Exploring Relationships between the Mantua-Maker and Client in the Construction of Eighteenth-Century Court Dress
• Astrid Castres (École nationale des chartes, Paris), Producing Garments for the Court: Innovations and Technical Transfers in Parisian Fashion Workshops during the Sixteenth Century
• Moïra Dato (European University Institute, Florence), The Lyonnais Silks as Objects of Conspicuous Consumption in Eighteenth-Century French Court
14:45 Panel 3B
• Beth Walsh (University of East Anglia), The Late Stuarts and Their Political Cravats
• Isabella Rosner (University of Cambridge), ‘Grave Hogen Mogen, High and Mighty Frogs!’: The Mysteries of Seventeenth-Century Frog Pouch Fashion
• Kimberley Foy (Durham University), Points of Connection: Lace, Internationalism, and Political Authority in England, 1565–1625
16:00 Coffee and tea
16:15 Panel 4
• Marc W. S. Jaffré (University of St Andrews), Adorned with Stones of Inestimable Size and Value’: Tailors, Taste and Fashion at the Court of Louis XIII, 1610–1643
• Lindsay Dupertuis (University of Maryland), Dressed for Battle: Military Costume and Aristocratic Fashion in Sixteenth-Century Italy
17:15 Keynote Address
• Maria Hayward (University of Southampton)
18:00 Closing Remarks
18:15 Wine Reception





















leave a comment