Enfilade

As a follow-up to yesterday’s posting of the call for papers for this year’s meeting in November of the North American Conference of British Studies, I would draw readers’ attention to The British and Irish Studies Intelligencer (BISI), a blog founded in the summer of 2014 under the auspices of the NACBS. While its reach extends well beyond the eighteenth century, for those of you working within the field of British Studies, there will be items of potential interest. A piece from last month, for instance, by Robin Eagles, “John Wilkes the Tourist: Travel in 18th-century England,” occasioned by the publication of Eagles’s edition of The Diaries of John Wilkes 1770–1797 (London Record Society, 2014), addresses not only Wilkes’s travels but underscores the usefulness of his diaries for eighteenth-century travel more generally thanks to the specificity of his notes.

As a member of BISI’s editorial board, I encourage you to have a look at the submissions page, and please feel free to contact me with questions or ideas for contributions. –CH

Editorial Board
Elaine Chalus, Bath Spa University
Craig Hanson, Calvin College
Jason M. Kelly, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
Isaac Land, Indiana State University

Bloggers
Caroline Boswell, University of Wisconsin, Green Bay
Stephen Jackson, University of Sioux Falls

Skyline of Little Rock, Arkansas, from the top of the River Market parking deck looking southwest, March 2005. Photo by Bruce Stracener, via Wikimedia Commons.

◊  ◊  ◊  ◊  ◊

From NACBS:

North American Conference of British Studies Annual Meeting
Little Rock, Arkansas, 13–15 November 2015

Proposals due by 3 March 2015

The NACBS (North American Conference on British Studies) and its Southern affiliate, the Southern Conference on British Studies, seek participation by scholars in all areas of British Studies for the 2015 meeting. We will meet in Little Rock, Arkansas, November 13–15, 2015 (in conjunction with the meeting of the Southern Historical Association). We solicit proposals for panels on Britain, the British Empire and the British world. Our interests range from the medieval to the modern. We welcome participation by scholars across the humanities and social sciences.

We invite panel proposals addressing selected themes, methodology, and pedagogy, as well as roundtable discussions of topical and thematic interest, including conversations among authors of recent books and reflections on landmark scholarship. We are particularly interested in submissions that have a broad chronological focus and/or interdisciplinary breadth. North American scholars, international scholars and Ph.D. students are all encouraged to submit proposals for consideration. Panels typically include three papers and a comment, and ideally a separate chair; roundtables customarily have four presentations, as well as a chair; proposals which only include papers will be less likely to succeed. We are not able to accommodate individual paper proposals; those with paper ideas may search for additional panelists on lists such as H-Albion or at venues such as the NACBS Facebook page. Applicants may also write to the Program Chair for suggestions (nacbsprogram@gmail.com).

In addition to the panels, this year we will be sponsoring a poster session. The posters will be exhibited throughout the conference, and there will be a scheduled time when presenters will be with their posters to allow for further discussion.

All scholars working in the field of British Studies are encouraged to apply for the 2015 conference. Panels that include both emerging and established scholars are encouraged; we welcome the participation of junior scholars and Ph.D. candidates beyond the qualifying stage. To foster intellectual interchange, we ask applicants to compose panels that feature participation from multiple institutions. No participant will be permitted to take part in more than one session.

More information is available here»

Thanks to Hélène Bremer for passing along this CFP:

Classical Influences on Georgian Stourhead
Stourhead, Wiltshire, 11–12 November 2015

Proposals due by 31 March 2015

Pantheon at Stourhead, via Wikimedia Commons. Photo by Luke Gordon, 14 August 2007.

The gardens at Stourhead feature a number of elements influenced by the legacy of classical Rome. Henry Hoare, the owner of Stourhead from 1741 to 1783, travelled to Rome as part of his own Grand Tour and his chief architect, Henry Flitcroft, was part of Lord Burlington’s circle. On Day 1 of this event we will explore classical influences on the eighteenth-century English country garden. On Day 2 we will consider classical influences solely in the context of the garden and wider estate at Stourhead.

We invite papers on all aspects of classical influences on the eighteenth-century English garden and particularly the following topics:
• The influence of the Grand Tour on eighteenth-century English country gardens
• Visitor accounts of Stourhead and other eighteenth-century English country gardens
• Eighteenth-century English country garden designers
• The picturesque and the design and reception of the eighteenth-century English country garden
• Depiction of the eighteenth-century English country garden in the fine arts
• The country garden and publishing: newspapers, periodicals, guidebooks and journals
• Topographical poetry
• Theories of meaning in the eighteenth-century English country garden
• Relationships between houses, gardens and wider estates
• Lord Burlington and his circle
• The influence of classical Roman literature on the eighteenth-century English country garden
• Greek influences in eighteenth-century English country gardens

If you would like to present a paper, then please send a 300-word abstract to Dr. John Harrison at: jeh87@my.open.ac.uk by 31st March 2015.

Keynote Speakers
Roey Sweet, author of Cities and the Grand Tour: The British in Italy, 1690–1820 (University of Leicester); and Richard Wheeler, National Specialist in Garden History (National Trust)

From the YCBA:

The Romantic Eye, 1760–1860 and Beyond
Yale University, New Haven, 17–18 April 2015

Proposals due by 2 February 2015

This symposium examines Romanticism as a shape-shifting cultural phenomenon that resists easy categorization. Focusing on the period from 1760 to 1860, the symposium embraces the amorphousness that has been ascribed to Romanticism historically by eschewing any limiting definition of it, seeking instead to explore the broad range of art and visual culture characterized as ‘Romantic’ during this hundred-year span. We are interested in what the Romantic ‘eye’ pursued and perceived, and how it set itself the task of recording those perceptions. In addition to interrogations of the relationship between the visual arts and Romanticism, we welcome papers on writers, composers, scientists, and philosophers whose projects engaged the visual. Papers also are sought for a special panel that will address the legacies of Romanticism in contemporary art.

This symposium coincides with a major collaborative exhibition organized by the Yale Center for British Art and the Yale University Art Gallery, The Critique of Reason: Romantic Art, 1760–1860, which opens March 6, 2015. The exhibition comprises more than three hundred paintings, sculptures, medals, watercolors, drawings, prints, and photographs by such iconic artists as William Blake, John Constable, Honoré Daumier, David d’Angers, Eugène Delacroix, Henry Fuseli, Théodore Géricault, Francisco de Goya, John Martin, and J. M. W. Turner. Talks that respond explicitly to works in the collections of the Yale Center for British Art or the Yale University Art Gallery are particularly encouraged, as are cross-disciplinary and comparative studies.

We are seeking presentations of thirty minutes in length. Graduate students and early career scholars are particularly encouraged to apply. Travel and accommodation costs will be covered by the organizers. Please e-mail abstracts of no more than three hundred words and a short CV or bio (no more than two pages) by February 2, 2015, to romanticism2015@gmail.com.

The symposium is co-sponsored by the Department of the History of Art at Yale University, the Yale Center for British Art, the Yale University Art Gallery, and the Yale Student Colloquia Fund.

From the conference website:

Echoes—Reflections: German Studies Graduate Conference
Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, 24–25 April 2015

Proposals due by 31 January 2015

Keynote Speaker: Professor Avital Ronell, New York University

Ich kann Dich noch sehn: ein Echo.
Ertastbar mit Fühl-
wörtern, am Abschieds-
grat.  –Paul Celan, “Ich kann Dich noch sehen”

At the ridge of language, language resounds as an echo—an echo that is the other of and in language, resounding in repetitions and transformations, always already endangered to be forgotten in impending silence. Silence haunts the end of each line break, each seismic shift, in the first stanza of Celan’s poem “Ich kann Dich noch sehen” (1967), which addresses the echo as an aesthetic phenomenon at the outer limit of presence. The outer limit of presence marked by the echo is never one of merely sound or speech, but towards and for a lost presence that has ceased to be hearable as well as visible. Such an interrelation of voice and reflection is also central to Ovid’s classical rendition of the myth about the nymph Echo: she is forced to repeat the words of her vis-à-vis, while Narcissus, at the brim of a well, falls in love with his own image.

Since the 18th century, the evasive echo has been a point of reflection in German literature and philosophy. From Lessing to Herder and Kant, aesthetic re-flection attempted to correct, enrich, and complement ethical and political discourse, whether as a subjective faculty, Besinnung, or the counterpart of conceptual knowledge. Between loss and intensification, echoes of thought and language reverberate through Hegel’s speculative logic, the Romantics’ idea of art as a medium of reflection, Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals, and Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory. In the 20th century, during which concepts such as history and historical time were continuously challenged, the echo allowed for a rethinking of nonlinear and discontinuous forms of correspondence, interruption, and similarity. While Walter Benjamin emphasizes the translator’s task of perceiving the “echo of the original,” Heidegger, Celan, and others, in turn, take up the concern of how the pursuit of such an origin remains enmeshed in questions of historical specificity, politics, and rhetoric. (more…)

From H-ArtHist:

Discovering Dalmatia in 18th- and 19th-Century Travelogues, Pictures, and Photographs
Institute of Art History – Center Cvito Fiskovic in Split, Croatia, 21–23 May 2015

Proposals due by 28 February 2015

The idea of the Grand Tour, which began in the 17th century, gained extreme popularity throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. Although the Grand Tour originally focused on Rome, the exploration of  the Ancient World, in which the origins of the Neoclassical period lay, its reach widened to further areas once part of the Roman Empire, among which Dalmatia held a prominent position. Drawings and literary works by travel writers-artists from that period are treasured in prestigious European museums and libraries and together constitute a priceless portion of the European cultural heritage.

There are two fundamental reasons why Dalmatia became a major destination of the European Grand Tour in the 18th and the 19th centuries: it presented a fountainhead of Ancient forms, knowledge of which helped in the quest for a universal language of architecture, and in addition it was almost an uncharted territory inspiring Enlightenment intellectuals to discover and get to know the world.

Ancient architecture presented the dominant cultural infrastructure of that period in Europe. The outline of the European Grand Tour embraces places which preserved the traces of those idealised times. However, travel writers also collected information of another kind; on the topography and customs, language and religion and in short a general representation of the area they wanted to come to know and write about.

The overall aim of the conference is to identify, problematise and integrate the issues related to the phenomenon of description of space, predominantly Dalmatian. This phenomenon was a formative factor in the development of European Neoclassicism and Romanticism in literature, the arts and architecture. Invited to the conference, accordingly, are art historians, literature comparatists, historians, architecture historians and theorists and experts from cognate disciplines to contribution to the research into the role of Dalmatia in the European Grand Tour in all its aspects.

The conference arises out of the research project Dalmatia: A Destination of European Grand Tour in the 18th and the 19th Century (2014–2017) of the Institute of Art History, under the aegis of the Croatian Science Foundation. Please visit our website to learn more about the project.

We welcome proposals for 20-minute papers. Proposals should consist of a 250-word abstract and 1-page CV, sent via email as a pdf attachment to asverko@ipu.hr by 28 February 2015. Notification of acceptance will be sent by 9 March 2015. If you have questions about the conference, please contact the organizing committee at asverko@ipu.hr.

Academic Committee
Josko Belamaric (Institute of Art History – Centre Cvito Fiskovic Split)
Cvijeta Pavlovic (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences)
Milan Pelc (Institute of Art History Zagreb)
John A. Pinto (Princeton University)
Ana Sverko (Institute of Art History – Centre Cvito Fiskovic Split)
Elke Katharina Wittich (Fresenius University of Applied Sciences,  AMD Hamburg)

Organizing Committee
Josko Belamaric (Institute of Art History – Centre Cvito Fiskovic Split)
Cvijeta Pavlovic (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences)
Milan Pelc (Institute of Art History Zagreb)
Ana Sverko (Institute of Art History – Centre Cvito Fiskovic Split)

Important Information
• Registration fee is 50 euros.
• The registration fee includes: welcome reception on 20/05/2015 evening; conference material; lunches and refreshments during the scheduled breaks.
• Registration fee can be paid by bank transfer. The invoice of the participation fee will be sent to the participants by e-mail within 5 days of the notification of acceptance.
• The organizers could arrange accommodation for the participants.
• The organizers are not able to pay the travel expenses of the participants.
• Conference languages: English and French.
• The duration of a spoken contribution should not exceed 20 minutes. Contributions will be divided into sections according to topics. Each section will be followed by discussion.
• Selected papers will be published in the conference proceedings. Please send final written version by 31/08/2015.

From H-ArtHist:

Baroque for a Wide Public: Popular Media and Their
Constructions of the Epoch on Both Sides of the Iron Curtain
Barock für ein breites Publikum. Konstruktionen der Epoche
in populären Medien diesseits und jenseits des Eisernen Vorhangs
Humboldt University Berlin, 11–13 June 2015

Proposals due by 15 February 2015

Organised by Prof. Dr. Michaela Marek, Chair of Art History of Eastern Europe at the Institute of Art and Visual History of Humboldt University Berlin

Histories of art and artists have found a mass public, especially since the 1950s, with the rise of magazines and illustrated books, radio, fictional and documentary films as well as large photo and art exhibitions. Intended for a broad public, they allow to detect the ideas of art and cultural heritage, and connected to that, interpretive models of historic developments in the tension of traditional historic interpretations and current interests. Nevertheless, the significance of pop-cultural art histories (Doris Berger) has not yet been researched thoroughly—particularly by comparative studies—against the background of the competing systems.

This is particularly obvious when forms of communicating art historical knowledge on earlier epochs like the Baroque are studied. While its construction as an epoch of absolutism and of Counter-Reformation initially rather strained its perception in state socialism, exhibitions in Austria advertised the Baroque as a national style serving identity policies (Andreas Nierhaus).

The question is what meanings were attached to the term ‘Baroque’. How were art works and buildings of the 17th and 18th centuries—a time characterised by a Europe-wide circulating of creative ideas—presented in exhibitions, illustrated books, films, travel guides, object-related brochures, school books or in literature on local history? How did predominant national paradigms of art historiography find expression in them, how the existence of the ‘Iron Curtain’? What concepts of historiography were constructed in these media, what images of the epoch were outlined? Did the exhibitions and popular literature differ regarding the intended domestic or foreign public? What were the (new) focuses, evaluations, symbolic charges and attributions to integrate or exclude ‘precarious’ monuments? What relation existed between academic and popular art histories, for which not rarely leading members of the discipline had a share of the responsibility? What role played international exchange and cooperation in the Cold War, as e. g. regarding travelling exhibitions? And which influence did current social incidents and developments exert on the communication of Baroque art in the countries in question during the decades of the division of Europe?

The aim of the symposium as well as of the research project Asymmetrische Kunstgeschichte? Erforschung und Vermittlung ‘prekärer’ Denkmälerbestände im Kalten Krieg (Asymmetrical Art History? Research and Communication of ‘Precarious’ Monuments in the Cold War) in the frame of which the conference will take place is to fathom comparative approaches to art histories and their popularizations as an East-Western intertwined history of discourse. In this context, the focus will be intentionally not the preservation of the objects, but the concepts expressed in texts and images of this period of art between ideological role models and creative interpretation.

Please send us a proposal (one A4-page maximum) of your (unpublished) contribution of 20 minutes as well as a short CV by 15 February, 2015. Conference languages are German and English.

Contact addresses for papers and queries:
Prof. Dr. Michaela Marek, michaela.marek@culture.hu-berlin.de
Eva Pluharová-Grigiene, pluharova@culture.hu-berlin.de
Renata Choinka, choinka@hu-berlin.de

From H-ArtHist:

Global France, Global French
Humanities Research Centre, Australian National University, Canberra, 21–23 October 2015

Proposals due by 5 March 2015

Confirmed keynotes
Professor Dominic Thomas, University of California, Los Angeles
Professor Charles Forsdick, University of Liverpool

In the eyes of many, France was the centre of the world throughout the modern age. Home of the Revolution and the Rights of Man, heart of a vast colonial empire, capital of the literary, fashion and art worlds, France, and Paris in particular, was at once historical and mythical. Today, following upon a sequence of ‘turns’, from the postcolonial to the global, this centre has given way to multiple centres, to conflicting and complementary sites of physical, economic and cultural exchange. As France has transitioned from a colonial power to a central member of the European Union, it has been forced to negotiate immigration policies, the rise of political extremism and the growing unrest over the linguistic, cultural and spatial borders that divide French society. Debates about French national identity rage in political and cultural sectors: while some seek to bolster a weakened idea of ‘Frenchness’, others, for example the signatories of the 2007 Littérature-monde manifesto, aim to redefine or ‘world’ that identity.

Art work by Fabienne Verdier

At the same time, the ‘global turn’ in French studies has encouraged scholars to re-examine French literature, language, culture and history through a new, decentred perspective. Recent criticism in literature and history, for example, has returned to early modern literary texts and spaces as well as to major historical events like the French Revolution, exploring the ways in which these traditions and events were not determined in a cultural vacuum, but, as Peter Hulme has noted, ‘were the product[s] of constant, intricate, but mostly unacknowledged traffic with the non-European world’.

The goal of this colloquium is to offer an image of global France and global French, past, present and future. How have French culture and politics been shaped by encounters with European neighbours and with the non-European world? How do contemporary migratory patterns and networks between France and the wider world compare to historical ones? How have neo-colonial practices been reshaped by globalized markets and transnational capital? How have various art forms allowed for the articulation of displacement, community and solidarity throughout French history and into the global present? In short, is the global a new horizon, or one that we are just discovering?

Our aim is to generate an interdisciplinary discussion among colleagues in a wide range of fields, including literature, film, linguistics, cultural studies, history, art history, philosophy, music and digital humanities. Topics for papers/panels include but are not limited to:
• Global vs. local (cultures, histories, languages, art forms)
• Migration: patterns and networks
• Migration: language and policy
• The European Union and French national identity
• Multicultural, multilingual, multiethnic France/Paris
• Colonial, postcolonial, neo-colonial flows and encounters
• Translation among languages, cultures, media
• The circulation of bodies, capital, ideas, linguistic forms, art forms
• Borders: visible and invisible, inner and outer, real and imagined, linguistic and geopolitical
• Travel, tourism, trade
• Diasporas, past and present

Please send an abstract of 300 words and a CV (max 2 pages) to Leslie.Barnes@anu.edu.au. Papers can be in English or French. The deadline for abstracts is 5 March 2015.

From H-ArtHist:

Re-imagining Childhood: Images, Objects and the Voice of the Child
Centre for the Study of Play and Recreation, University of Greenwich, 9 May 2015

Proposals due by 1 March 2015

The Society for the Study of Childhood in the Past
This conference aims to stimulate interdisciplinary debate on the question of what images and material objects can tell us about the subjective experience of being a child in the past. It will explore the ways in which non-written evidence—in particular that which comes under the heading ‘material culture’ and ‘visual culture’—can be used to open up new possibilities for the study of the history of childhood.

As Peter Stearns indicated in his “Challenges in the History of Childhood” (The Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth, 2008), no one interested in the importance of history as a way to understand the human condition, can ignore the importance of historical perspectives about childhood. The history of childhood has been shaped by the concerns of the world in which its historians live. Although the discipline that we understand today as ‘history of childhood’ is less than 100 years old, it is a field of growing interest, as reflected in the ever-greater number of publications dealing with the subject. Childhood and children are increasingly present on the bookshelves, in documentaries and in exhibitions, and there seems to be an almost inexhaustible consumption of the values and ideas that children and childhood represent. Thus we find ourselves at a fascinating time for considering what it is that adults seek in the image of the child. What attracts us? What disturbs us? What is at play in the gaze of the child?

One could claim that all histories written about children are related, in one way or another, to the book that is considered to represent the origin of the discipline: Centuries of Childhood (L’Enfant et la Vie Familiale sous l’Ancien Régime), which Philippe Ariès wrote in 1960. Ariès’ great success was to convince almost all his readers that childhood has a history and that, across time and in different cultures, both ideas about childhood and the experience of being a child have changed. While Aries’ evidence was wide-ranging, he has been much criticised for failing to subject it to proper scrutiny. In particular, he has been accused of ‘reading’ images too literally.  As a result, historians became very cautious about the use of non-written evidence which has only recently started to make a renewed and welcome impact. It is clear that most approaches to the history of childhood depend heavily on textual sources, but this approach can lead to a distorted understanding, in so far as many experiences of the past are not reflected in those texts. Other paths could be—and must be—explored.

Re-imagining Childhood attempts to go beyond this limitation by arguing that the history of childhood—or, at least, any history of childhood which purports to cover more than a limited historical period—is possible only through a multidisciplinary exercise that adds evidence from visual or material culture to the study of published sources. The study of the material and visual culture of childhood provides a way to contribute to a better understanding of earlier concepts of childhood. These additional sources also help us to tap into children’s experiences and they thereby serve as helpful tools in unravelling the ‘voice of the child’.

We welcome original studies that focus on any historical period, carried out within the arts and humanities or the social sciences, that shed light on the power of objects and images to bring children back into the history of childhood. An abstract of no more than 300 words for a 20-minute presentation, along with the title, name and affiliation, should be send to Leticia Fernández-Fontecha Rumeu (playandrecreation@greenwich.ac.uk) by March 1st. Applicants whose papers are accepted will be notified by March 15th.