In This Month’s ‘Apollo Magazine’

Posted in journal articles by Editor on September 9, 2010

The eighteenth century in the September issue of Apollo Magazine:

Michael Pick, “Remarkable and Curious” — The quantity and superb quality of 18th-century French furniture in English collections is testament to the British passion for their neighbours’ designs, yet the presence of these works is little known in the UK or abroad.

Selma Schwartz, “Objects of Desire” — Sèvres’ lesser-known output of veilleuses, exquisite 18th-century nightlights or perfume burners, reflect in miniature the contemporary fashions and collectors’ interests of the time, including the depiction of drunken men in the style of Teniers the Younger.

Sylvain Levy-Alban, “A Taste for History” — The interior designer Jacques Garcia, currently refurbishing the 17th- and 18th-century period rooms at the Louvre, shares his obsessive passion for collecting with Apollo.

Rethinking Study Habits: Mix It Up

Posted in teaching resources by Editor on September 9, 2010

Benedict Carey, “Forget What You Know about Good Study Habits,” The New York Times (6 September 2010) . . .

. . . In recent years, cognitive scientists have shown that a few simple techniques can reliably improve what matters most: how much a student learns from studying. The findings can help anyone, from a fourth grader doing long division to a retiree taking on a new language. But they directly contradict much of the common wisdom about good study habits, and they have not caught on. . . .

These findings extend . . . even to aesthetic intuitive learning. In an experiment published last month in the journal Psychology and Aging, researchers found that college students and adults of retirement age were better able to distinguish the painting styles of 12 unfamiliar artists after viewing mixed collections (assortments, including works from all 12) than after viewing a dozen works from one artist, all together, then moving on to the next painter. . . .

The full article is available here»

◊  ◊  ◊  ◊  ◊

The Psychology and Aging article referenced is even more interesting than the the NY Times piece might imply:

Nate Kornell, Alan D. Castel, Teal S. Eich, Robert A. Bjork, “Spacing as the Friend of Both Memory and Induction in Young and Older Adults,” Psychology and Aging 25 (2010): 498-503.

Abstract: We compared the effects of spaced versus massed practice on young and older adults’ ability to learn visually complex paintings. We expected a spacing advantage when 1 painting per artist was studied repeatedly and tested (repetition) but perhaps a massing advantage, especially for older adults, when multiple different paintings by each artist were studied and tested (induction). We were surprised to find that spacing facilitated both inductive and repetition learning by both young and older adults, even though the participants rated massing superior to spacing for inductive learning. Thus, challenging learners of any age appears to have unintuitive benefits for both memory and induction.

%d bloggers like this: